Volume 6, Issue 3 (Autumn 2023)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023, 6(3): 33-42 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Yazdani Ghadi S, Jabbari N, Azma F. (2023). Presenting the Development Model of Educational Organizations with Emphasis on the Entrepreneurship Drivers in Higher Education. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(3), 33-42. doi:10.61186/ijes.6.3.33
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1318-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1318-en.html
1- PhD student, Department of Educational Management, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan Branch, Gorgan, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan Branch, Gorgan, Iran
3- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.
Abstract: (733 Views)
Purpose: The development of educational organizations plays an important role in creating a competitive advantage for organizations. Therefore, the aim of this study was to presenting the development model of educational organizations with emphasis on the entrepreneurship drivers in higher education.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was descriptive from type of cross-sectional. The research population were included all faculty members of Golestan province universities, numbering 1023 people. The sample size was calculated based on Cochran's formula 279 people, which were selected by stratified random sampling method. The research tool was 80 question researcher-made questionnaire on the development of educational organizations with emphasis on entrepreneurial drivers, which whose content validity according to the opinion of experts was calculated as 0.74. Data were analyzed with exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling methods in SPSS-21 and Smart PLS-3 software.
Findings: The findings showed that the development of educational organizations with emphasis on the entrepreneurial drivers had 80 items in 12 components and 5 dimensions. Dimensions were included entrepreneurial and knowledge-based education and research (with two components of entrepreneurial and knowledge-based research and entrepreneurial and knowledge-based education), structural-organizational (with four components of structure and organization, leadership management, human resources and financial resources and academic independence), technological development and growth (with one component of technological development and growth), policy making of science and technology and the governance system of the higher education system (with two components of development of entrepreneurial mission and perspective and policy making) and contextual factors (with three components of support factors, interaction and communication and cultural-social factors) which whose factor load of all was higher than 0.60, their average variance extracted was higher than 0.50 and their reliability with using Cronbach's alpha and combined methods was calculated higher than 0.70. Also, the development model of educational organizations with emphasis on the entrepreneurship drivers in higher education had a good fit. In addition, the development model of educational organizations with emphasis on the entrepreneurship drivers in higher education on each of the dimensions and each of the dimensions on its components had a direct and significant effect (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The development model of educational organizations with emphasis on the entrepreneurship drivers in higher education designed in the present research can help the experts and planners of the higher education system in designing plans to improve educational organizations.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was descriptive from type of cross-sectional. The research population were included all faculty members of Golestan province universities, numbering 1023 people. The sample size was calculated based on Cochran's formula 279 people, which were selected by stratified random sampling method. The research tool was 80 question researcher-made questionnaire on the development of educational organizations with emphasis on entrepreneurial drivers, which whose content validity according to the opinion of experts was calculated as 0.74. Data were analyzed with exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling methods in SPSS-21 and Smart PLS-3 software.
Findings: The findings showed that the development of educational organizations with emphasis on the entrepreneurial drivers had 80 items in 12 components and 5 dimensions. Dimensions were included entrepreneurial and knowledge-based education and research (with two components of entrepreneurial and knowledge-based research and entrepreneurial and knowledge-based education), structural-organizational (with four components of structure and organization, leadership management, human resources and financial resources and academic independence), technological development and growth (with one component of technological development and growth), policy making of science and technology and the governance system of the higher education system (with two components of development of entrepreneurial mission and perspective and policy making) and contextual factors (with three components of support factors, interaction and communication and cultural-social factors) which whose factor load of all was higher than 0.60, their average variance extracted was higher than 0.50 and their reliability with using Cronbach's alpha and combined methods was calculated higher than 0.70. Also, the development model of educational organizations with emphasis on the entrepreneurship drivers in higher education had a good fit. In addition, the development model of educational organizations with emphasis on the entrepreneurship drivers in higher education on each of the dimensions and each of the dimensions on its components had a direct and significant effect (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The development model of educational organizations with emphasis on the entrepreneurship drivers in higher education designed in the present research can help the experts and planners of the higher education system in designing plans to improve educational organizations.
Keywords: Development of Educational Organizations, Entrepreneurship Drivers, Higher Education, Entrepreneurial and Knowledge-Based Education, Cultural-Social Factors
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/08/18 | Accepted: 2023/10/28 | Published: 2023/12/1
Received: 2023/08/18 | Accepted: 2023/10/28 | Published: 2023/12/1
References
1. Aljabhan B. (2023). Economic strategic plans with supply chain risk management (SCRM) for organizational growth and development. Alexandria Engineering Journal. 79: 411-426. [DOI:10.1016/j.aej.2023.08.020]
2. Bakhshi Jahromi M, Moazzami M, Kavousy E, Hosseinpour Saadatabadi J. (2021). Developing a model for the development of entrepreneurial culture in Farhangian University. Journal of Educational Management Innovation. 16(3): 118-140. [Persian]
3. Bastas A, Liyanage K. (2019). Setting a framework for organisational sustainable development. Sustainable Production and Consumption. 20: 207-229. [DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2019.06.005]
4. Bergmann H, Geissler M, Hundt C. (2018). The climate for entrepreneurship at higher education institutions. Research Policy. 47(4): 700-716. [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2018.01.018]
5. Cernicova-Buca M. (2010). Organizational development and change in higher education: Implications for the Romanian Universities. The International Journal of Higher Education and Democracy. 1: 65-71.
6. Chen P, Levy DL. (2023). Regulation of organelle size and organization during development. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology. 133: 53-64. [DOI:10.1016/j.semcdb.2022.02.002] [PMID]
7. Fernandez-Nogueira D, Arruti A, Markuerkiaga L, Saenz N. (2018). The entrepreneurial university: A selection of good practices. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. 21(3): 1-17.
8. Garbanzo-Vargas GM. (2016). Organizational development and change processes in educational institutions, a challenge for the management of education. Educacion. 40(1): 67-87.
9. Gallan AS, Kabadayi S, Ali F, Helkkula A, Wu L, Zhang Y. (2021). Transformative hospitality services: A conceptualization and development of organizational dimensions. Journal of Business Research. 134: 171-183. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.028]
10. Gregori P, Holzmann P, Wdowiak MA. (2021). For the sake of nature: Identity work and meaningful experiences in environmental entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research. 122: 488-501.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-021-01008-0 [DOI:10.1038/d41586-021-01521-x] [PMID]
11. Hashemi M, Fallah V, Taheri F. (2022) The impact of technological learning development in educational organizations with ambidexterous innovation approach (Mazandaran Educational Institution). Quarterly Journal of Training in Police Sciences. 10(36): 151-182. [Persian]
12. Hassani Z, Abolghasemi M, Moshabaki Esgahani A. (2018). Provide a university entrepreneurship model for the technical and vocational college. Journal of Research in Educational Science. 12(Special Issue): 1213-1234. [Persian]
13. Hayter CS, Cahoy DR. (2018). Toward a strategic view of higher education social responsibilities: A dynamic capabilities approach. Strategic Organization. 16(1): 12-34. [DOI:10.1177/1476127016680564]
14. Kupilas KJ, Montequin VR, Gonzalez JG, Iglesias GA. (2023). Digital maturity model for research and development organization with the aspect of sustainability. Procedia Computer Science. 219: 1583-1590. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.450]
15. Long Z, Zhao G, Wang J, Zhang M, Zhou S, Zhang L, Huang Z. (2021). Research on the drivers of entrepreneurship education performance of medical students in the digital age. Frontiers in Psychology. 12(733301): 1-17. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733301] [PMID] []
16. Lopez-Cabarcos MA, Vazquez-Rodriguez P, Pineiro J, Caby J. (2020). The role of bullying in the development of organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Research. 115: 272-280. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.025]
17. Maresch D, Harms R, Kailer N, Wimmer-Wurm B. (2016). The impact of entrepreneurship education on the entrepreneurial intention of students in science and engineering versus business studies university programs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 104: 172-179. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.006]
18. Mican C, Fernandes G, Araujo M. (2023). Modeling the risk of an organizational development portfolio. Procedia Computer Science. 219-1930-1937. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2023.01.492]
19. Modarresi Saryazdi SJ, Abbaspour A, Modarresi Saryazd AS. (2022). Identifying the strategic drivers of entrepreneurial university by a meta-synthesize. Quarterly Scientific Journal of Technical and Vocational University. 19(2): 37-69. [Persian]
20. Olszak CM. (2022). Business intelligence systems for innovative development of organizations. Procedia Computer Science. 207: 1754-1762. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.233]
21. Pirdadeh Beyranvand K, Ahmadvand M, Sharafi Sarabi V., (2019). The human driving forces of entrepreneurship development in tourism sector: A Case study of the village of Istgah Bisheh in Khorramabad County. Journal of Rural Research. 9(4): 564-579. [Persian]
22. Ririhena R, Notanubun Z. (2021). Organizational development and change along with the reinventing in education. Journal of Pendidikan Profesi Guru Indonesia. 1(1): 21-27. [DOI:10.30598/jppgivol1issue1page21-27]
23. Shuli Z, Hua Z, Junlin W. (2018). Cognition and system construction of civil engineering innovation and entrepreneurship system in emerging engineering education. Cognitive Systems Research. 52: 1020-1028. [DOI:10.1016/j.cogsys.2018.10.020]
24. Stechert C, Balzerkiewitz HP. (2020). Digitalization of a lean product development organization. Procedia CIRP. 91: 764-769. [DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2020.02.232]
25. Stevenson RM, Josefy M. (2019). Knocking at the gate: The path to publication for entrepreneurship experiments through the lens of gatekeeping theory. Journal of Business Venturing. 34(2): 242-260. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.10.008]
26. Wu B, Geng B, Wang Y, McCabe S, Liao L, Zeng L, Deng B. (2022). Reverse entrepreneurship and integration in poor areas of China: Case studies of tourism entrepreneurship in Ganzi Tibetan Region of Sichuan. Journal of Rural Studies. 96: 358-368. [DOI:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.11.012]
27. Yi Z, Gong X, Guo P, Wu T. (2019). What drives entrepreneurship in digital economy? Evidence from China. Economic Modelling. 82: 66-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.econmod.2019.09.026]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
