Articles In Press
Back to the articles list |
Back to browse issues page
1- Department of English Language and Literature, Faculty of Languages and Literature, University of Tehran, Tehran, iran
2- Department Of English Language And Literature, Faculty Of Languages And Literature, University Of Tehran, Kish International Campus, Kish Island, iran
2- Department Of English Language And Literature, Faculty Of Languages And Literature, University Of Tehran, Kish International Campus, Kish Island, iran
Abstract: (189 Views)
Purpose: This systematic review aims to examine the role of intrinsic motivation (IM) in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ academic achievement within online instructional contexts.
Methods and Materials: A systematic review methodology was employed following PRISMA guidelines to identify, screen, and synthesize relevant empirical studies published between 2012 and 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed studies conducted in English, focusing on the relationship between IM and EFL achievement in online learning environments. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria after screening 3,042 initial records across multiple academic databases, including ProQuest, SAGE, Wiley Online Library, Springer, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The selected studies featured diverse methodological designs—quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods—and were assessed for quality using standardized tools. The data were synthesized using descriptive analysis to identify patterns, key outcomes, and influencing factors.
Findings: The review found consistent evidence of a positive correlation between IM and EFL learners' achievement in various online learning tasks, including writing, reading, speaking, vocabulary acquisition, and grammatical proficiency. Learners with higher IM demonstrated stronger engagement, self-regulation, and satisfaction with online courses. Key internal factors influencing IM included personal interest, self-efficacy beliefs, intrinsic value of tasks, and future aspirations. External factors such as teacher support, peer interaction, technological tools (e.g., WhatsApp, YouTube, Babbel), and learning environments also significantly affected IM. Conversely, lack of IM was associated with decreased learner confidence, poor performance, and disengagement.
Conclusion: Intrinsic motivation is a critical determinant of academic success in online EFL instruction. Fostering IM through learner-centered strategies, meaningful task design, and supportive environments can enhance engagement and performance. This review provides empirical evidence to inform educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers on effective approaches to strengthen IM in virtual language learning contexts.
Methods and Materials: A systematic review methodology was employed following PRISMA guidelines to identify, screen, and synthesize relevant empirical studies published between 2012 and 2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed studies conducted in English, focusing on the relationship between IM and EFL achievement in online learning environments. Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria after screening 3,042 initial records across multiple academic databases, including ProQuest, SAGE, Wiley Online Library, Springer, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. The selected studies featured diverse methodological designs—quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods—and were assessed for quality using standardized tools. The data were synthesized using descriptive analysis to identify patterns, key outcomes, and influencing factors.
Findings: The review found consistent evidence of a positive correlation between IM and EFL learners' achievement in various online learning tasks, including writing, reading, speaking, vocabulary acquisition, and grammatical proficiency. Learners with higher IM demonstrated stronger engagement, self-regulation, and satisfaction with online courses. Key internal factors influencing IM included personal interest, self-efficacy beliefs, intrinsic value of tasks, and future aspirations. External factors such as teacher support, peer interaction, technological tools (e.g., WhatsApp, YouTube, Babbel), and learning environments also significantly affected IM. Conversely, lack of IM was associated with decreased learner confidence, poor performance, and disengagement.
Conclusion: Intrinsic motivation is a critical determinant of academic success in online EFL instruction. Fostering IM through learner-centered strategies, meaningful task design, and supportive environments can enhance engagement and performance. This review provides empirical evidence to inform educators, curriculum developers, and policymakers on effective approaches to strengthen IM in virtual language learning contexts.
Keywords: EFL achievement, EFL learners, intrinsic motivation, online instruction, systematic review
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2025/03/14 | Accepted: 2025/05/17 | Published: 2025/05/19
Received: 2025/03/14 | Accepted: 2025/05/17 | Published: 2025/05/19
References
1. Abedini, A., Abedin, B., & Zowghi, D. (2021). Adult learning in online communities of practice: A systematic review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(9), 1663-1694. [DOI:10.1111/bjet.13120]
2. Adara, R. A., & Puspahaty, N. (2021). How EFL learners maintain motivational factors and positive attitudes during COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 5(2). [DOI:10.29240/ef.v5i2.3398]
3. Alcaraz Cárceles, I. M. (2018). Intrinsic motivation in the EFL classroom: preferred taxonomies for classroom activities. PublicationesDidacticas, 94. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/235853173.pdf
4. Ali, Z. (2022). Investigating the intrinsic motivation among second language learners in using digital learning platforms during the Covid-19 pandemic. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 2(2), 437-452. [DOI:10.24093/awej/covid2.29]
5. Alonso, R. K., Vélez, A., & Martínez-Monteagudo, M. C. (2023). Interventions for the Development of Intrinsic Motivation in University Online Education: Systematic Review-Enhancing the 4th Sustainable Development Goal. Sustainability, 15, 9862. [DOI:10.3390/su15139862]
6. Amin, E. A. (2019). A correlational study between some motivational constructs and EFL writing performance in a blended learning environment. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(3). [DOI:10.5539/ijel.v9n3p238]
7. Aromataris, E., & Pearson, A. (2014). The systematic review: An overview. AJN, 114(3), 53-58. [DOI:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000444496.24228.2c] [PMID]
8. Bailey, D., Almusharraf, N., & Hatcher, R. (2021). Finding satisfaction: Intrinsic motivation for synchronous and asynchronous communication in the online language learning context. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 2563-2583. [DOI:10.1007/s10639-020-10369-z] [PMID] []
9. Chowdhury, T. A., Roy, S., & Kabilan, M. K. (2021). Learner motivation in the EFL classrooms: Voices from a Bangladeshi university. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), 221-232. [DOI:10.17509/ijal.v11i1.34618]
10. De Lozier, C. D. M. (2019). Motivation, proficiency and performance in extensive reading. International Journal of Innovation and Research in Educational Sciences, 6(3). http://ijires.org/administrator/components/com_jresearch/files/publications/IJIRES_1559_FINAL.pdf
11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. [DOI:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01]
12. Fang, X. (2020). The impact of online teaching on the English learning motivation of Chinese students during COVID-19. 2020 International Symposium on Education, Culture and Social Sciences,
13. Faramarzi Babadi, S., Eskandari Asl, H. A., Dolatyari, F., & Alipoor, H. (2024). Limitations of English Language Learning in Universities of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province and Strategies to Overcome Them [Research Article]. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 7(1), 124-132. [DOI:10.61838/kman.ijes.7.1.12]
14. García-Sánchez, S., & Luján-García, C. (2016). Ubiquitous knowledge and experiences to foster EFL learning affordances. Computer Assisted Language Learning. [DOI:10.1080/09588221.2016.1176047]
15. Higgins, J. P., & Green, S. (2011). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration. www.cochrane-handbook.org
16. Imamyartha, D., Wahjuningsih, E., A'Yunin, A., Santihastuti, A., Mitasari, F. D. L. T. A., & Andika, E. C. H. (2022). EFL learners' engagement and learning motivation in team-based mobile language learning through WhatsApp. Teaching English with Technology, 22(1), 82-103. http://www.tewtjournal.org
17. Kaid Mohammed Ali, J. (2022). The Impact of Online Learning amid COVID-19 Pandemic on Student Intrinsic Motivation and English Language Improvement. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 49(6), 125-134. [DOI:10.35516/hum.v49i6.3726]
18. Kokabi Rahman, E., Taghvaei, D., & Pirani, Z. (2023). The Effectiveness of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies Teaching on Academic Motivation, Academic Engagement and Quality of Life in School of Students with Specific Learning Disorder in Hamadan City. Sociology of Education, 8(2), 257-266. [DOI:10.22034/ijes.2023.707262]
19. Kost, S. (2003). Motivation and foreign language teaching-strategies for motivation. Grin. https://www.grin.com/document/45323?lang=en&srsltid=AfmBOoo08kemKO9PxjME21lMNsJNSwxwYMkk-3iubmzoTVNZQ0StXNR8
20. Li, Y. (2023). The effect of online collaborative writing instruction on enhancing writing performance, writing motivation, and writing self-efficacy of Chinese EFL learners. Frontiers in psychology, 14, 1165221. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165221] [PMID] []
21. Miri Rami, S. F., Delgoshaei, Y., & Mahmoudi, A. H. (2022). Identification and Analysis of Effective Factors on the Strategic Intelligence of Education Districts Managers of Tehran City and Provide an Appropriate Model [Research Article]. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 5(1), 113-125. [DOI:10.61186/ijes.5.1.113]
22. Mohtar, M., & Md Yunus, M. (2022). A Systematic Review of Online Learning during COVID 19: Students' Motivation, Task Engagement and Acceptance. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 2(2), 202-215.
https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid2.13 [DOI:10.24093/awej/covid2.13 10.2139/ssrn.4036738 10.31235/osf.io/m6sfe]
23. Nurhidayah, A., Susilawati, E., & Surmiyati. (2023). Students' motivation in completing English assignments in online learning during COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 6(1), 120-129.
https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v6i1.617 [DOI:10.33503/journey.v6i1.617 10.33503/journey.v6i1.2637]
24. Oliveira, M. M., Sporn, Z., Kliemann, L., Borschke, A., & Meyering, M. (2021). Online language learning and workplace communication: A study on Babbel's virtual-classroom solution. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09588221.2021.2002364
25. Peechapol, C., Na-Songkhla, J., Sujiva, S., & Luangsodsai, A. (2018). An exploration of factors influencing self-efficacy in online learning: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(9), 1. [DOI:10.3991/ijet.v13i09.8351]
26. Perwitasari, E., Fachriya, E., & Hasanah, A. (2021). Dueting Whatsapp and Youtube for Improving Students' Engagement in Online Learning Mode. Seminar Nasional Riset Linguistik dan Pengajaran Bahasa (SENARILIP V),
27. Phuong, T. T. H. (2022). Learning motivation of Vietnamese EFL learners in fully online classes during Covid-19: A mixed methods study. Issues in Educational Research, 32(2), 681-698. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361438842_Learning_motivation_of_Vietnamese_EFL_learners_in_fully_online_classes_during_Covid-19_A_mixed_methods_study
28. Shan, Y. M. (2020). Whether Successful Language Learners Require Intrinsic Motivation. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 10, 549-559. [DOI:10.4236/ojml.2020.105031]
29. Tabitha, P., & Pramono, Y. G. H. (2022). Online English learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Motivating and demotivating factors among EFL students. Magister Scientiae, 50(2). [DOI:10.33508/mgs.v50i2.4175]
30. Teng, M. F., Wang, C., & Wu, J. G. (2021). Metacognitive strategies, language learning motivation, self-efficacy belief, and English achievement during remote learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Relc Journal. [DOI:10.31234/osf.io/epm6s]
31. Tricco, A. C., Antony, J., Zarin, W., Strifler, L., Ghassemi, M., Ivory, J., & Moher, D. (2011). The art and science of knowledge synthesis. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64(1), 11-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.11.007] [PMID]
32. Wang, Y. (2023). EFL Higher Vocational Students' Motivational Regulation and Learner Autonomy in Online Learning Context in China. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(6). [DOI:10.54691/fhss.v3i6.5150]
33. Yanzhi, M. (2022). Literature Review of Learning Demotivation among Foreign Language Learners. International Journal of English Literature and Social Sciences, 7(1). [DOI:10.22161/ijels.71.23]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
