1. Ahtiainen R. (2017). Shades of change in Fullan's and Hargreaves's models: Theoretical change perspectives regarding Finnish special education reform. University of Helsinki: Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Centre for Educational Assessment.
2. Ashraf T. (2019). Experiences and impact: The voices of teachers on math education reform in Ontario, Canada. Bulgaria: Bulgarian Comparative Education Society, Annual International Conference of the Bulgarian Comparative Education Society, 101-107.
3. Berlinski S, Busso M. (2017). Challenges in educational reform: An experiment on active learning in mathematics. Economics Letters. 156: 172-175. [
DOI:10.1016/j.econlet.2017.05.007]
4. Darragh L, Valoyes-Chavez L. (2019). Blurred lines: Producing the mathematics student through discourses of special educational needs in the context of reform mathematics in Chile. Educational Studies in Mathematics. 101(3): 425-439. [
DOI:10.1007/s10649-018-9875-7]
5. Eacott S, Holmes K. (2010). Leading reform in mathematics education: Solving a complex equation. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development. 12(2): 84-97.
6. Fullan M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Gholamazad S. (2020). School mathematics curriculum change: Challenges and required research. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 15(57): 107-128. [Persian]
8. Haghi SE, Rostamy Malkhalifeh M, Behzadi MH, Shahvarani A. (2019). Evaluation of students' performance before and after parent involvement in math education with DEA. Journal of New Researches in Mathematics. 5(21): 105-124. [Persian]
9. Haghkhah S, Davoudi A. (2021). Strategies for preventing and correcting mathematical misunderstandings (a qualitative study). Quarterly Journal of Education in Basic Sciences. 6(21): 24-37. [Persian]
10. Mafakheri Sh. (2020). An introduction to the necessity of teaching "fuzzy mathematics" to Farhangian University student-teachers and elementary teachers. Quarterly Journal of Education in Basic Sciences. 6(19): 22-29. [Persian]
11. Nieveen N, Plomp T. (2017). Five key principle for educational change. SLO, Enschede: The Netherlands.
12. Sandilos LE, Baroody AE, Rimm-Kaufman SE, Merritt EG. (2020). English learners' achievement in mathematics and science: Examining the role of self-efficacy. Journal of School Psychology. 79: 1-15. [
DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2020.02.002] [
PMID]
13. Shirani Bidabadi N, Nasr Isfahani AR, Mirshah Jafari E, Abedi A. (2019). Investigating the efficacy of pre-primary school practical math on math competency and learning behaviors of children. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences. 13(44): 23-36. [Persian]
14. Vahedi Sh, Piri M, Malekzadeh R. (2019). The effectiveness of concept maps in teaching mathematics concepts and mathematics self-concept among elementary school students. Educational Psychology. 14(48): 19-36. [Persian]
15. Vanden Ham AK, Heinze A. (2018). Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students' achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 59: 133-140. [
DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.005]
16. Yiwen Z. (2020). How do we understand mathematical practices in non-mathematical fields? Reflections inspired by cases from 12th and 13th century China. Historia Mathematica. 52: 1-25. [
DOI:10.1016/j.hm.2020.04.004]
17. Ziaei M, Keshtiaray N, Kashefi HR. (2021). Factors affecting educational reforms aimed at empowerment of high school math teachers. Jundishapur Education Development Journal. 12(Special Issue): 73-85. [Persian]