Volume 4, Issue 4 (12-2021)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2021, 4(4): 202-214 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khosravi Z, Taleb Z, Samie Zafarghandi M, Masoudi Nadoshan E. (2021). A Comparative Study of University' Social Responsibility Patterns: Strategies for Iranian Universities. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 4(4), 202-214. doi:10.52547/ijes.4.4.202
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1109-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1109-en.html
1- Phf student, Department of Psychology, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Associate Professor of Educational Research and Planning Organization, Research Institute of the Ministry of Education
4- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3- Associate Professor of Educational Research and Planning Organization, Research Institute of the Ministry of Education
4- Associate Professor, Department of Psychology, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (2894 Views)
Purpose: The present research was conducted with the aim of comparative study of university' social responsibility patterns to provide strategies for Iranian universities.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was qualitative. The research population was all articles and books related to social responsibility and university' social responsibility patterns in the 1990 to 2021 years. Out of 23 resources related to university social response patterns number of 14 resources based on the inclusion criteria were selected as a sample by purposive sampling method. Data were collected by documentary method and take noting from them and were analyzed by content analysis method.
Findings: Findings showed that the university' social responsibility patterns mainly emphasized on 10 components of environmental conditions (economic, political, cultural and social), law, ethics, humanitarian, stakeholders, philosophy and goals of the pattern, theoretical foundations, perceptual framework, implementation stages and evaluation and engineering system. Also, a comparative study of university' social responsibility patterns indicated that these patterns were more similar from each other in terms of four components of environmental conditions, stakeholders, implementation stages and evaluation and engineering system and were more different from each other in terms of six components of law, ethics, humanitarian, philosophy and goals of the pattern, theoretical foundations and perceptual framework.
Conclusion: The results of this research can have practical implications for university specialists and planners. They can with the help of identified components take an effective step towards promoting social responsibility in universities
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was qualitative. The research population was all articles and books related to social responsibility and university' social responsibility patterns in the 1990 to 2021 years. Out of 23 resources related to university social response patterns number of 14 resources based on the inclusion criteria were selected as a sample by purposive sampling method. Data were collected by documentary method and take noting from them and were analyzed by content analysis method.
Findings: Findings showed that the university' social responsibility patterns mainly emphasized on 10 components of environmental conditions (economic, political, cultural and social), law, ethics, humanitarian, stakeholders, philosophy and goals of the pattern, theoretical foundations, perceptual framework, implementation stages and evaluation and engineering system. Also, a comparative study of university' social responsibility patterns indicated that these patterns were more similar from each other in terms of four components of environmental conditions, stakeholders, implementation stages and evaluation and engineering system and were more different from each other in terms of six components of law, ethics, humanitarian, philosophy and goals of the pattern, theoretical foundations and perceptual framework.
Conclusion: The results of this research can have practical implications for university specialists and planners. They can with the help of identified components take an effective step towards promoting social responsibility in universities
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2021/10/25 | Accepted: 2021/11/30 | Published: 2021/12/12
Received: 2021/10/25 | Accepted: 2021/11/30 | Published: 2021/12/12
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
