Volume 5, Issue 3 (Autumn 2022)                   Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2022, 5(3): 242-259 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Arjmandnia Tabriz A, Delkhosh Kasmaei A, Oladian M. Policy-Making Model in the Private School System. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2022; 5 (3) :242-259
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1168-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Educational Management, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Human Resources Management, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author)
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Damavand Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (1227 Views)
Purpose: This paper mainly aimed to provide a model for policy-making in the private school system.
Methodology: Based on the literature review, 17 influential factors were identified with the mixed method of survey and theme analysis. In the qualitative part, the semantic pattern was discovered and analyzed with the RQDA qualitative analysis software, and in the quantitative part, the Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) method was used to determine relationships. Statistical population in the qualitative part were 20 people (policy-making experts, professors and senior managers) were selected and participated in a semi-structured and quantitative interview. A number of 1140 schools were selected from Northern, Central and Southern Khorasan using a simple random sampling method with proof of validity and reliability.
Findings: The results of factors affecting policy-making based on fuzzy numerical average are: Investment 0.72, government aid 0.87, managers 0.74, teachers 0.73, executive agents 0.75, educational equipment 0.81, government-approved laws 0.89, banking system 0.88, tax and insurance 0.73, municipal, housing and urban organizations 0.33, community members 0.65, experts 0.8, Farhangian University training 0.8, coordination council 0.81, specialized founders 0.78, special schools 0.78, supervisory council 0.88, which because municipal organizations, housing and urban development 0.33, and community members 0.65 were lower than the average, they were rejected and the rest were accepted. Strategies in the first level (managers, executives and teachers) are the most effective and the sixth level (government laws) is the most effective.
Conclusion: Based on the results, the other 15 factors that have a great impact on policy-making should be considered.
Full-Text [PDF 529 kb]   (139 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/03/6 | Accepted: 2022/07/30

References
1. Ahmadian Deokti, Mohammad Mahdi et al., 2017, Designing a science and technology policy model based on the economic complexity approach/Scientific Quarterly - Public Policy Research/Course 4/Number 4/Pages 9-27/
2. Akbari Zahra - 2018- The challenge of quality in government and non-government schools - Bank of educational and cultural articles
3. Amjozi, 2020, The Role of NGOs in Primary Education: A Study of Six NGOs in India. Research paper in the field of policy making; No. 2530. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank
4. Antoni Verger, (2019), Partnering with non-governmental organizations in public education: contributions to an ongoing debate (Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain) (EEPN) [DOI:10.1108/JEA-07-2019-224]
5. Askari Mehdi et al., 2018, comparison of educational policies of Iran and Japan at the primary level, scientific-research quarterly "Strategic Studies of Public Policy", 865 Presidential Strategic Review Center
6. Askari Mehdi et al., 2018, comparison of educational policies of Iran and Japan at the primary level, scientific-research quarterly "Strategic Studies of Public Policy", 865 Presidential Strategic Review Center
7. Ebrahim Niai Vishka and Sugueh Maryam, 2019, identifying and prioritizing the factors affecting the collection of claims in insurance companies using interpretative structural modeling (ism), modern research approaches in management and accounting » summer 2019 - number 33 (3rd volume)
8. Eyal, Ori & Berkovich, Izhak. (2019). Ethics in third sector-school partnerships: a conceptual framework. Journal of Educational Administration. 10.1108/JEA-08-2018-0143. [DOI:10.1108/JEA-08-2018-0143]
9. Francesc Pedró, Gabrielle Leroux, Watanabe, Megumi, 2015, ,unesdog, The privation of education in developing countries, evidence and policy implications, 2009- - PatrinosFelipe Barrera-OsorioJuliana Guáqueta 13-
10. Habibpour Karam, 2018, the model of the relationship between the government and non-governmental organizations in Iran's social policymaking (Journal of Sociology of Social Institutions, Spring and Summer 2018, No. 13)
11. Kariminejad Hossein, Ghorchian Nadergholi, and Jafari Paryosh, 2018, presenting a model to improve the quality of universities and non-governmental and non-profit higher education institutions - management and planning in the system in educational systems, volume 12, number 1, consecutive 22 spring and summer [DOI:10.29252/mpes.12.1.13]
12. Mohammadi Mehdi, Jabari Negin, Dehrouye Maryam, 2019, investigation of the factors affecting students' satisfaction with public and non-government schools in girls' primary schools in Gorgan city.
13. Non-government schools set for multibillion-dollar funding boost, 2020, 9-Adam Carey
14. Non-Governmental Schooling in Sub-Saharan Africa. Exploring the Evidence in South Africa and Malawi
15. Non-governmental_religious_schools_in_Germany_-_increasing_demand_by_decreasing_religiosity
16. Restailisius and Kastakajovana, Structural dimensions of Roman school segregation policies in Central and Eastern Europe, University of Budapest, Hungary, Journal of European Educational Research, Volume 13, Number 3, 268, 2014) [DOI:10.2304/eerj.2014.13.3.268]
17. Rezaei Mohsen, Der Ali Farashah Samieh, 2019, using the activity-based costing method to compare two public and private sectors in education in Ardakan city (elementary school)
18. Rihaf A. Madani 2019, education quality analysis, education goal for all policies [DOI:10.5539/hes.v9n1p100]
19. Rostami et al., 2019 Comparative comparison of Iranian and Swiss education
20. Sabutina, Kruchenko, Vygova, 2019, autonomous non-profit additional professional training "Discovery" 174/5000
21. Sayed Yusuf & M. Lewin Keith Mahesh Dahal Quynh Nguyen 2014 Policy Research Working Paper 6899 Private Non-State Sector Engagement in the Provision of Educational Services at the Primary and Secondary Levels in South Asia An Analytical Review of Its Role in School Enrollment and Student
22. Schanfolag Ant, Wensmark, 2015, 11, non-government schools in primary and secondary education
23. Scheunpflug Annette, 2015, 1-Non-governmental religious schools in Germany - increasing demand by decreasing religiosity? [DOI:10.1080/03050068.2014.935577]
24. Special Letter 923 of the Islamic Council (2015)
25. The Role and Impact of Public-Private Partnerships in Education Harry Anthony
26. The role of NGOs in primary education: A study of six NGOs in India. Research paper in the field of policy making; No. 2530. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank
27. Verger Anthony, 2019, Partnership with non-governmental organizations in public education, participation in ongoing discussion, Journal of Educational Management, Volume 57, Number 4, pp. 426-430 [DOI:10.1108/JEA-07-2019-224]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian journal of educational sociology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb