Volume 5, Issue 1 (Spring 2022)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2022, 5(1): 62-75 |
Back to browse issues page
1- PhD Student, Department of Public Administration, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Management and Accounting, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
3- Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Management and Accounting, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran.
3- Associate Professor, Department of Public Administration, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (1265 Views)
Purpose: Considering the importance of human resource planning for organizational citizenship behavior, the purpose of this study was identify, explain and prioritize human resource planning factors in order to occurrence organizational citizenship behavior by employees.
Methodology: The present research was descriptive from type of qualitative-quantitative. The research population in the qualitative part was documents and texts related to the research and experts were familiar with the subject who tried to identify and explain the factors of human resource planning in order to occurrence organizational citizenship behavior and in the quantitative part were the experts who prioritized these factors. The research sample consisted of 20 research-related documents and 15 experts who were selected by purposive non-random sampling method. Data collection tools included taking notes of documents and texts and surveying about new effective factors and expressing the rate of importance of existing factors in Delphi. Data were analyzed by coding and factor analysis methods.
Findings: Findings showed that for the human resource planning pattern in order to occurrence organizational citizenship behavior by employees in the human resource planning part were identified 67 indicators in 19 components and in the organizational citizenship behavior part were identified 28 indicators in 6 components. In human resource planning the 19 components respectively were include performance management, labor adjustment, organizational culture, strategic goals, organizational structure, human resource planning, recruitment, training and development, maintenance, external environment, supply, demand, human resource strategy, strategic planning, management style, flexibility, reward system, job analysis and individual factors and in organizational citizenship behavior the 6 components respectively were include altruism, work conscience, personal development, organizational loyalty, organizational obedience and citizenship virtue.
Conclusion: According to the reported results, to develop the occurrence of organizational citizenship behavior by employees can be action through its effective human resource planning factors that was identified in the present research.
Methodology: The present research was descriptive from type of qualitative-quantitative. The research population in the qualitative part was documents and texts related to the research and experts were familiar with the subject who tried to identify and explain the factors of human resource planning in order to occurrence organizational citizenship behavior and in the quantitative part were the experts who prioritized these factors. The research sample consisted of 20 research-related documents and 15 experts who were selected by purposive non-random sampling method. Data collection tools included taking notes of documents and texts and surveying about new effective factors and expressing the rate of importance of existing factors in Delphi. Data were analyzed by coding and factor analysis methods.
Findings: Findings showed that for the human resource planning pattern in order to occurrence organizational citizenship behavior by employees in the human resource planning part were identified 67 indicators in 19 components and in the organizational citizenship behavior part were identified 28 indicators in 6 components. In human resource planning the 19 components respectively were include performance management, labor adjustment, organizational culture, strategic goals, organizational structure, human resource planning, recruitment, training and development, maintenance, external environment, supply, demand, human resource strategy, strategic planning, management style, flexibility, reward system, job analysis and individual factors and in organizational citizenship behavior the 6 components respectively were include altruism, work conscience, personal development, organizational loyalty, organizational obedience and citizenship virtue.
Conclusion: According to the reported results, to develop the occurrence of organizational citizenship behavior by employees can be action through its effective human resource planning factors that was identified in the present research.
Keywords: Planning, Human Resource, Human Resource Planning, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Employees
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2022/03/10 | Accepted: 2022/06/21 | Published: 2022/06/21
Received: 2022/03/10 | Accepted: 2022/06/21 | Published: 2022/06/21
References
1. Ahmadi AA, Fazeli Kebria H, Faghih MB. (2013). Designing general conceptual model for indices and components of manpower planning based on merits. The Scientific Journal of Strategy. 22(1): 147-177. [Persian]
2. Aviso KB, Chiu ASF, Demeterio FPA, Lucas RIG, Tseng ML, Tan RR. (2019). Optimal human resource planning with P-graph for universities undergoing transition. Journal of Cleaner Production. 224: 811-822. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.213]
3. Berk L, Bertsimas D, Weinstein AM, Yan J. (2019). Prescriptive analytics for human resource planning in the professional services industry. European Journal of Operational Research. 272(2): 636-641. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.06.035]
4. Bigdeli M, Davoudi R, Kamali N, Entesar Fomani Gl. (2018). Identifying the dimensions and components of human resource improvement in education for proposing a conceptual model. Journal of Research in Human Resources Management. 10(2): 73-100. [Persian]
5. Doll JL. (2022). Developing workforce planning skills in human resource management courses: A data-driven exercise. Management Teaching Review. 7(1): 89-108. [DOI:10.1177/23792981211057227]
6. Estiri M, Hesami S, Fayazi BM, Rezaali F. (2020). A survey on the role of mediating and moderating variables that can influence employee's organizational citizenship behaviors of urban public service providers. Human Geography Research Quarterly. 52(2): 14751492. [Persian]
7. Fahimzadeh H, Esmaeili M, Vahdati H, Sepahvand R. (2017). Identifying dimensions and components of organizational citizenship behavior in tourism industry. Journal of Tourism and Development. 6(2): 109-133. [Persian]
8. Gholam Hossaini E, Bejani H, MalekiNiya E. (2011). Influencing factors, constituents and consequences of organization citizenship behavior. Journal of Police Organizational Development. 7(31): 11-34. [Persian]
9. Hosseini SH, Hazrati M. (2011). Finding and development of organizational citizenship behaviors model in public organizations. Public Management Researches. 4(13): 139-156. [Persian]
10. Hosseyni SS, Sanoubar N. (2019). The effect of high performance human resource activities on organizational citizenship commitment and behavior of government employees. Journal of Economic & Developmental Sociology. 8(1): 103-129. [Persian]
11. Jahanian R. (2010). Strategies for optimizing human resource planning in education of Tehran. Knowledge and Research in Curriculum Planning. 24: 61-84. [Persian]
12. Karimi V, Navehebrahim A, Arasteh H, Behrangi M. (2015). The identification of humanities development management dimensions and components and providing a conceptual model. Quarterly Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education. 21(3): 151-169. [Persian]
13. Kaur N, Kang LS. (2021). Person-organisation fit, person-job fit and organisational citizenship behaviour: An examination of the mediating role of job satisfaction. IIMB Management Review. 33(4): 347-359. [DOI:10.1016/j.iimb.2021.12.003]
14. Lee S, Field RM. (2019). Human resource planning for authorized inspection activity. Nuclear Engineering and Technology. 51(2): 618-625. [DOI:10.1016/j.net.2018.10.017]
15. Lim BTH, Loosemore M. (2017). The effect of inter-organizational justice perceptions on organizational citizenship behaviors in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management. 35(2): 95-106. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.016]
16. Moayed N, Moeinfard MR, Shooshinasab P. (2020). The effect of organizational socialization on organizational citizenship behavior in employees with an emphasis on the mediating role of person - environment fit. Sport Physiology & Management Investigations. 12(1): 173-186. [Persian]
17. Organ D. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good solider syndrome. Lexington: Lexington Books.
18. Sadeghi A, Maleki Jamasbi M, Azami H, Karami M, Marziyeh Hassanian Z. (2019). Survey of the relationship between demographic characteristics and organizational citizenship behavior in nurses in Hamadan educational centers. Avicenna Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Care. 27(5): 326-334. [Persian] [DOI:10.30699/ajnmc.27.5.326]
19. Sidin I, Rivai F, Bulu RM. (2020). The role of Bugis cultural value to leader-member exchange and organizational citizenship behavior of Bugis nurses in Makassar. Enfermeria Clinica. 30(6): 217-220. [DOI:10.1016/j.enfcli.2020.06.049]
20. Singsungnoen K, Wannapiroon P, Nilsook P. (2021). Development of smart human resource planning system within Rajabhat University. Higher Education Studies. 11(2): 139-146. [DOI:10.5539/hes.v11n2p139]
21. Sun Y, Jiang H, Hwang Y, Shin D. (2018). Why should I share? An answer from personal information management and organizational citizenship behavior perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior. 87: 146-154. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.034]
22. Szabo ZP, Czibor A, Restas P, Bereczkei T. (2018). "The Darkest of all" The relationship between the Dark Triad traits and organizational citizenship behavior. Personality and Individual Differences. 134: 352-356. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.026]
23. Taskiran G, Iyigun NO. (2019). The relationship between organizational citizenship behavior and entrepreneurial orientation: A research in the hospitality industry. Procedia Computer Science. 158: 672-679. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.102]
24. Tatar P, Malekian F. (2021). Identifying the dimensions of teaching organizational citizenship behavior in the education office. Jundishapur Education Development Journal. 12(Special Issue): 39-49. [Persian]
25. Wang D, Ma E, Kim YS, Liu A, Berbekova A. (2021). From good soldiers to happy employees: Exploring the emotional and well-being outcomes of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 49: 570-579. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.11.005]
26. Yalcindag S, Cappanera P, Scutella MG, Sahin E, Matta A. (2016). Pattern-based decompositions for human resource planning in home health care services. Computers & Research. 12-26. [DOI:10.1016/j.cor.2016.02.011]
27. Yang D, He Q, Cui Q, Hsu SC. (2020). Non-economic motivations for organizational citizenship behavior in construction megaprojects. International Journal of Project Management. 38(1): 67-74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2020.03.024 [DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2020.07.017]
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |