1. Allina B. (2018). The development of STEAM educational policy to promote student creativity and social empowerment. Arts Education Policy Review. 119(2): 77-87. [
DOI:10.1080/10632913.2017.1296392]
2. Arrieta G, Dancel J, & Agbisit M. (2020). Teaching Science in The New Normal: Understanding the Experiences of Junior High School Science Teachers JURNAL PENDIDIKAN MIP. 21(2): 146-162. [
DOI:10.23960/jpmipa/v21i2.pp146-162]
3. Ata Aktürk A, & Demircan, O. (2017). A review of studies on STEM and STEAM education in early childhood. Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty. 18(2): 757-776.
4. Bernstein D A. (2015). A negotiation model for teaching critical thinking. The teaching of Psychology. 4(22): 11. 26.
5. Boyatzis R E. (2018). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development, APA (American Psychological Association). 14(77): 31-35.
6. Campbell C, Speldewinde C, Howitt C, & MacDonald A. (2018). STEM practice in the early years. Creative Education. 9: 11-25. DOI: 10.4236/ce.2018.91002 [
DOI:10.4236/ce.2018.91002]
7. Cook L A. (2012). STEAM charter schools: the role of the arts in developing innovation and creativity within the curriculum. University of La Verne, California, College of Education and Organizational Leadership, Organizational Leadership Department. 3(36): 10-63.
8. Delavar A. (2010). Theoretical and practical foundations of research in humanities and social sciences. Tehran: Roshd Publication Press.135: 53-65. [in Persian].
9. DeRosa J. (2017). STEAM Curriculum: Arts Education as An Integral Part of Interdisciplinary Learning, Running head: STEAM curriculum plan. Messiah College. ProQuest LLC. (74): 128-140.
10. Elsayary A. (2021). Teaching and Assessing Creativity, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies. Zayed University, Abu Dhabi. The United Arab Emirates. (65): 6-32.
11. Ghanirad M A. (2006). Student interactions, motivation, and discipline. Research and planning in higher education. 12(2): 57-69. [in Persian].
12. Glass D & Wilson C. (2016). The art and science of looking: Collaboratively learning our way to improved STEAM education [PDF]. Art Education. 69(6): 8-14 [
DOI:10.1080/00043125.2016.1224822]
13. Guyotte K W, Nicki W, Sochacka TE, Costantino J W, & Nadia N K. (2015) Steam as Social Practice: Cultivating Creativity in Transdisciplinary Spaces, Art Education. 67(6): 12-19, DOI: 10.1080/00043125.2014.11519293 [
DOI:10.1080/00043125.2014.11519293]
14. Hadinugrahaningsih T, Rahmawati Y, Ridwan A. (2017). Developing 21st-century skills in chemistry classrooms: Opportunities and challenges of STEAM integration, Chemistry Education Study Program. (22):6-68. [
DOI:10.1063/1.4995107]
15. Harlen W. (1999). Effective Teaching of science. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education. The Scottish Council for Research in Education. (62):14-68.
16. Harris W. (2012). Examination Pediatrics: a guide to pediatric training. The New Zealand medical.124 (15),67. 87.
17. Henriksen D. (2017). Creating STEAM with design thinking: Beyond STEM and arts integration. The STEAM Journal. 3(1): 27-39. [
DOI:10.5642/steam.20170301.11]
18. Herrington J, Reeves T C, & Oliver R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. New York: Springer Ferguson R. Innovating Pedagogy. Open University Innovation Report 5. Milton Keynes: The Open University. (112):39.62.
19. Herro D, Quigley C, & Cian H. (2019). The Challenges of STEAM Instruction: Lessons from the Field. Action in Teacher Education. 7(12): 69-83.
20. Kalaybar R, Habibi F, & Bahadori J. (2019). The effect of the rhetoric teaching model and seven-stage learning cycle model on improving students' creative thinking. Journal of Teaching Research. 35(1):7-25.
21. Kerlinger F N. (2012). Foundations of Behavioral Research. 23rd Edition, Holt, Rinehart, and Winston. (55):120-210.
22. Khalili M. (2005). What Students Should Know About Visual Arts. Journal of Art Education. (20): 89-98. [in Persian].
23. Kim Y, & Park N. (2012). The effect of STEAM education on elementary school students' creativity improvement. In Computer applications for security. control and system engineering. (56):16-43.
24. Land M. (2013). Full STEAM Ahead: The Benefit of Integrating the Arts into STEM. Conference Organized by Missouri University of Science and Technology. (18):20-74. [
DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2013.09.317]
25. Liao C. (2016). From interdisciplinary to transdisciplinary: An arts-integrated approach to STEAM education. Art Education .69(6):141-157. [
DOI:10.1080/00043125.2016.1224873]
26. Lu Y, Liu W, Wu T, Sandy F E, & Huang Y. (2019). A Study of Problem-Solving using Blocks Vehicle in a STEAM Course for Lower Elementary Levels. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning. (51):32-117. [
DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-35343-8_6]
27. Maneen C A. (2016). A Case Study of Arts Integration Practices in Developing the 21st Century Skills of Critical Thinking, Creativity. Communication, and Collaboration, Education Dissertation, and Projects. (28): 27-65.
28. Mehr Mohammadi M. (2018). Philosophy of Contemporary Science Simultaneous education and aesthetic capabilities, the first conference of elementary experimental sciences, Isfahan: General Department of Education of Isfahan province. (14): 45-67. [in Persian].
29. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
30. Norman G R, & Schmidt H G. (2010). Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Theory, practice and paper darts. Medical Education. 34(9): 51-89. [
DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2000.00749.x] [
PMID]
31. Patton R M, & Knochel A D. (2017). Meaningful makers: Stuff, sharing, and connection in the STEAM curriculum. Art Education. 70(1): 36-43. [
DOI:10.1080/00043125.2017.1247571]
32. Rusmana A, bandariY S, Aini R, Rachmatullah A, & Ha M. (2021). Teaching Korean science for Indonesian middle school students: promoting Indonesian students' attitude towards science through the global science exchange Program. International Journal of Science Education. (39): 66-81. [
DOI:10.1080/09500693.2021.1938278]
33. Sarkhosh S. (2021). Identifying the components and elements of the curriculum based on problem-solving skills to provide an optimal model for preschool. Journal of Teaching Research. 9 (1): 87-103. [in Persian].
34. Shaykhei Fini A, Raissi Ahvan Y, zainalipour H. (2021). The Relationship between The Hidden Curriculum Components and The Affective Attitudes of High School Students' Learning. Iranian Journal of Learning & Memory. 4(14): 15-25. DOI: 10.22034/iepa.2021.290914.1281
35. Sochacka N W, Guyotte K W, & Walther J. (2016). Learning together: A collaborative autoethnographic exploration of STEAM (STEM+ the Arts) education. Journal of Engineering Education. 105(1): 15-42. [
DOI:10.1002/jee.20112]
36. Tae J. (2017). A Quest on Possibility of Design Thinking-based STEAM Education for Strengthening Elementary School Students' Interest in Math and Science, Personalities, and Science and Technology Career Choice. International Information Institute.2 (20): 14- 41.
37. Talebi N. (2016). The effect of teachers 'professional development on students' performance in 4th-grade students according to data (Thames) (2011). Master Thesis, Kharazmi University. 41-55. [in Persian]
38. Vusumuzi M, & Manthiba E R. (2020). The Design Thinking Approach to students' STEAM projects. Procedia, CIRP. (80):32-84.
39. Wade-Leeuwen B Covers J, Silk M. (2018). Explainer: what's the difference between STEM and STEAM? The Conversation. 4(1): 78-98
40. Zainali H, & Behroozi A. (2019). Comparison of the effectiveness of teaching methods of brainstorming and problem solving on teacher-student interaction, Scientific Journal of Teaching Research. 8(2): 36-47. [in Persian].