Volume 5, Issue 3 (Autumn 2022)                   Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2022, 5(3): 195-213 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


1- MA student, Department of Educational Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Management, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (733 Views)
Purpose: This paper aimed to examine the pathology of Shahab national plan in primary schools of Shahryar, Tehran, Iran.
Methodology: This research was conducted with a mixed exploratory method, that is, firstly, using semi-structured interviews and a qualitative method of the fuzzy Delphi type, the harms of Shahab National Plan were identified and prioritized, then the current situation of the harms was investigated using a quantitative descriptive-survey method. The statistical population of the qualitative part of the research was specialists and experts working in the Ministry of Education as well as university professors. The sampling method in this section was a targeted method, according to the principle of theoretical saturation, 15 of them were selected as a sample. The statistical population of the quantitative part of the research was made up of all the fifth grade teachers of the elementary school of Shahryar city, whose number was 441 in the academic year of 2018-2019. To determine the sample size in this section, the Cochran formula table was used and 230 people were selected as a sample, whose selection method was cluster random. The research tools were semi-structured interview, fuzzy Delphi questionnaire and researcher-made questionnaire. Reliability and validity in the qualitative part were obtained according to the audit strategies of the research. In the quantitative part, the reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed through Cronbach’s alpha test, and it was used to confirm the formal and content validity of the questionnaire from the experts’ point of view. To analyze the results in the qualitative part, content analysis of interviews and fuzzy Delphi were used, and in the quantitative part, one sample t-test was used in SPSS.
Findings: Based on the qualitative findings, the harms of Shahab plan were identified and prioritized in three areas: behavioral (including 14 harms), structural (including 19 harms) and contextual (including 25 harms). According to the analysis of quantitative data, the current state of harms was examined from the teachers’ point of view.
Conclusion: The results of one sample t-test showed that most of the harms are at a level higher than the assumed average of the community and a few are at an average level or lower than the average.
Full-Text [PDF 796 kb]   (202 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/07/24 | Accepted: 2022/10/2

References
1. Abolhasani, Ashraf (2013). The effectiveness of counselors' evaluations in the field of academic guidance "choosing a field of study" with the progress of secondary school girls in Tehran in the academic year 92-93. Master's thesis of Islamic Azad University, central Tehran branch.
2. Alipour, Mohammad (2017). A phenomenological study of Birjand city teachers' perception of Shahab project, Master's thesis, Birjand University
3. Alipour, Mohammad and Aiti, Mohsen (2017). A comparative study of how to identify and guide gifted students in Iran, Germany and Poland, 10th National Education Conference, Tehran.
4. Asefi, Maryam (2018). Pathology of Shahab National Project, Master's Thesis, Khwarazmi University
5. Borghans, L., Prevoo, T., & Schils, T. (2016). Gifted children: how to identify them?. Retrieved from.
6. Dadashi, Fatemeh (2013). Factors affecting the choice of the field of study of successful high school students. Master's thesis. Al-Zahra University.
7. Daniels, V. I. McCollin, M. J. (2010). The Identification of Students with Gifts and Talents. In P. L. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education(3rd ed, vol.2, pp.870-875). Elsevier Ltd. [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.01144-1]
8. Eslami, Sayedah Zahra and Aiti, Mohsen (2010). Enriching the curriculum, an approach, to cultivate superior talents and create the ground for elitism. The first national conference of education in Iran 1404. Tehran.
9. Gall, Meredith; Borg, Walter and Gall, Joyce (2016). Quantitative and qualitative research methods in educational sciences and psychology. Translated by Ahmed-Reza Nasr and colleagues. Tehran: Organization for Studying and Compiling Humanities Books of Universities (Department) and Shahid Beheshti University.
10. Gibson, Robert and Michelle Marian (2011). Basics of counseling and guidance. Translation, Baqir Sanaei. Tehran: Besat Publications.
11. Gibson, Robert and Michelle Marian (2019). Basics of counseling and guidance. Translated by Bagher Sanai. Tehran: Ba'ath Publications.
12. Habibi, Arash; Izdiyar, Siddiqa and Serafrazi, Azam (2013). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making, Rasht, Ketiba Gil.
13. Halahan & Koufman(2003). Learning disorders. Translation Alizadeh et al., Tehran: Edit. 2010.
14. Karimi, Abu Bakr (2014). The effect of career guidance and school counseling on the selection of vocational and technical education fields for witness and non-witness students in Mazandaran province. The fifth national conference of skills and employment, Tehran
15. Kolbasi, Afsana (2012). Evaluation of the curriculum of gifted schools in middle school and the current process of identifying gifted students in order to provide a good model. PhD Thesis. Shahid Beheshti University
16. Legam, H. L.& Hoare, C.H. (2014). Impact of a career intervention, AcademicAchievment, and self-esteem, professional school counseling, 8(2), 148-155
17. Madbouhi, Saeed; Fazil, Morteza; Sharifi, Mohammad (2016). Identifying the obstacles and challenges facing the implementation of Shahab project in elementary schools, Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 1(5): 17-28
18. Moradi, Ansieh and Akhwan, Mahnaz (2012). The satisfaction of theoretical high school students with their field choice and the factors affecting it. Educational Psychology Quarterly, 9(28): 37-52
19. Navidi, Ahad. 2018. Evaluation of the pilot implementation of the top talent identification and guidance plan (Shahab). Education, Volume 35, Spring 2018, Number 137.
20. Ozcan D, Uzunboylu H. (2020). School counsellors' perceptions ofworking with gifted students. South African Journal of Education, 40(1), April2020. [DOI:10.15700/saje.v40ns1a1899]
21. Peterson J S. (2018). Counseling gifted students: A guide for school counselors. Publisher: Springer Publishing Company. January 2018.
22. Siegel, R L, Kimberly D, Miller M, Ahmedin Jemal D. Cancer statistics, ACS journal. Volume66, Issue1, January/February 2016, Pages 7-30. [DOI:10.3322/caac.21332] [PMID]
23. Smedsrud J. (2018). Mathematically Gifted Accelerated Students Participating in an Ability Group: A Qualitative Interview Study. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 1359. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01359 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01359] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Subasinghe,Wasantha(2016). An Introduction on Educational Guidance and school Counseling. International Journal of Scientific Research and Innovative Technology ISSN: 2313-3759 Vol. 3 No. 10
25. Taghipourkaran, Hassan (2014). Shahab's plan from the beginning until now. Educational, training, research quarterly magazine of brilliant talents. 34-46.
26. Taseh Dar, Leila, Majd Far, Morteza and Aslani, Ibrahim. 2014, Shahab's manuscript, first edition, Tehran, Madrasa Publications.
27. Zandipour, Tayyaba and Shua Kazemi, Mehrangiz (2015). The effect of providing educational-occupational information on the educational-occupational options of female pre-university students of experimental sciences in Tehran region 2. Marafet Quarterly, (104): 13-29.

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.