Volume 8, Issue 1 (3-2025)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2025, 8(1): 169-180 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Samir Hariz J, Senobari M, Ghali N A, Shah Talebi B. (2025). Design and Validation of a School Ranking Model in the Iraqi Educational System. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 8(1), 169-180. doi:10.61838/kman.ijes.8.1.16
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1512-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1512-en.html
1- PhD student ,Department of Educational Management, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran.
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Al-Mustansiriya University, Babylon, Iraq.
4- Associate Professor, Department of Management, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran.
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Management, Al-Mustansiriya University, Babylon, Iraq.
4- Associate Professor, Department of Management, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract: (312 Views)
Purpose: This study aimed to design and validate a comprehensive school ranking model for the Iraqi educational system to enhance educational quality through the identification of key performance indicators and ranking components.
Methods and Materials: This research employed a qualitative design using thematic analysis to develop a model based on expert input. Participants included two groups: twelve university scholars with expertise in educational evaluation, selected through theoretical saturation, and eighteen provincial directors from the Iraqi Ministry of Education, selected via census sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews focusing on ranking indicators, contextual conditions, and performance components of schools. Thematic analysis was conducted using the Attride-Stirling method (2001), and coding was performed in multiple stages to extract basic, organizing, and global themes. The content validity of the proposed model was assessed using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI), and model validation was further supported through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
Findings: The final model includes 25 components grouped under eight organizing themes: educational, administrative and financial, cultural and social, school leadership, student-related, infrastructure and facilities, research-oriented, and human resources. A total of 69 standardized indicators were identified. CVR and CVI scores for all components exceeded the threshold value of 0.56, with overall values of 0.65 and 0.74 respectively, confirming the model's content validity. Additionally, standardized factor loadings and t-values derived from SEM indicated strong statistical significance (p < 0.001) for all latent variables and their corresponding indicators, demonstrating the model's structural validity.
Conclusion: The validated model offers a scientifically grounded framework for evaluating and ranking schools in Iraq, addressing both qualitative and quantitative dimensions. It provides educational policymakers with a strategic tool to assess school performance, allocate resources effectively, and promote continuous improvement in educational outcomes.
Methods and Materials: This research employed a qualitative design using thematic analysis to develop a model based on expert input. Participants included two groups: twelve university scholars with expertise in educational evaluation, selected through theoretical saturation, and eighteen provincial directors from the Iraqi Ministry of Education, selected via census sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews focusing on ranking indicators, contextual conditions, and performance components of schools. Thematic analysis was conducted using the Attride-Stirling method (2001), and coding was performed in multiple stages to extract basic, organizing, and global themes. The content validity of the proposed model was assessed using the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) and Content Validity Index (CVI), and model validation was further supported through Structural Equation Modeling (SEM).
Findings: The final model includes 25 components grouped under eight organizing themes: educational, administrative and financial, cultural and social, school leadership, student-related, infrastructure and facilities, research-oriented, and human resources. A total of 69 standardized indicators were identified. CVR and CVI scores for all components exceeded the threshold value of 0.56, with overall values of 0.65 and 0.74 respectively, confirming the model's content validity. Additionally, standardized factor loadings and t-values derived from SEM indicated strong statistical significance (p < 0.001) for all latent variables and their corresponding indicators, demonstrating the model's structural validity.
Conclusion: The validated model offers a scientifically grounded framework for evaluating and ranking schools in Iraq, addressing both qualitative and quantitative dimensions. It provides educational policymakers with a strategic tool to assess school performance, allocate resources effectively, and promote continuous improvement in educational outcomes.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2024/10/5 | Accepted: 2024/12/10 | Published: 2025/04/23
Received: 2024/10/5 | Accepted: 2024/12/10 | Published: 2025/04/23
References
1. Anderson, T., Blom, E., & Lindsay, C. (2020). Identifying high-performing schools for historically underserved students. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/101422/2020_02_07_remiqs_report_finalizedv2.pdf
2. Barrett, P., Treves, A., Shmis, T., Ambasz, D., & Ustinova, M. (2019). The impact of school infrastructure on learning: A synthesis of the evidence. The World Bank. [DOI:10.1596/978-1-4648-1378-8]
3. Bozorgi Nejad, K., Zarei, R., Amirian Zadeh, M., & Khayyer, M. (2020). Identifying Criteria and Indicators for Ranking Non-Governmental Schools from the Perspective of Strategic Factors. Scientific Journal of School Management, 8(1), 1-16. https://jsa.uok.ac.ir/article_61461.html
4. Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S., & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. University of Chicago Press. [DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226078014.001.0001]
5. Delaney, J. M., & Devereux, P. J. (2021). High school rank in math and english and the gender gap in STEM. Labour Economics. [DOI:10.1016/j.labeco.2021.101969]
6. Delprato, M., & Chudgar, A. (2018). Factors associated with private-public school performance: Analysis of TALIS-PISA link data. Educational Development, 61, 155-172. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2018.01.002]
7. Farrell, C. C. (2015). Designing School Systems to Encourage Data Use and Instructional Improvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 51(3), 438-471. [DOI:10.1177/0013161X14539806]
8. Golbargi, S. R. (2019). Ranking of School Criteria Based on the Sustainability Approach in Order to Design Green Schools. Third National Conference on New Academic Research in Art, Architecture and Civil Engineering.
9. Haji Bagheri, F., & Davami, A. H. (2021). Evaluation and Ranking of Schools Based on Health, Safety and Environment in Ahvaz Schools. Eleventh National Conference on Environment, Energy and Sustainable Natural Resources.
10. Harris, D. N. (2011). Value-Added Measures in Education: What Every Educator Needs to Know. Harvard Education Press. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258723133_Value-added_measures_in_education_What_every_educator_needs_to_know
11. Hassani, R., Jamali, A., Taghipour Zahir, A., & Rahgozar, M. (2017). Construction and Factor Analysis of a Model for Measuring the Ranking of Secondary Schools in the Country. Educational Management Research, 8(32), 41-63. https://www.magiran.com/paper/2167963/
12. Horan, W., & O'Regan, B. (2021). Developing a practical framework of sustainability indicators relevant to all higher education institutions to enable meaningful international rankings. Sustainability, 13(2), 1-15. [DOI:10.3390/su13020629]
13. Joshi, P. (2019). The growth, roles and needs of the private education system: Private stakeholder perspectives from Nepal. International Journal of Educational Development, 65, 57-67. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2019.01.002]
14. Kalule, L., & Bouchamma, Y. (2013). Supervisors' Perceptions of Instructional Supervision. International Studies in Educational Administration (ISEA), 41(1), 89-104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323958966_Supervisors'_Perception_of_Instructional_Supervision
15. Khanizad, R., & Montazer, G. A. (2017). A Comparative Evaluation of World University Ranking Systems. Science and Technology Policy, 9(3), 31-43. https://jstp.nrisp.ac.ir/article_12985_c42fa52b0af338442c9cbd3ccce38058.pdf
16. Loertscher, D. V., & Koechlin, C. (2015). Co-Teaching and the Learning Commons. Teacher Librarian, 43(2), 12-16. https://researcharchive.canadianschoollibraries.ca/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/TMC4_2016_Loertscher_Koechlin.pdf
17. Matulová, M. (2023). Ranking of European Universities by DEA-Based Sustainability Indicator. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 16(4), 287-298. [DOI:10.7160/eriesj.2023.160403]
18. Mehdikhani, H. (2015). Providing a Model for Performance Evaluation and Ranking of Secondary Schools with Stakeholder Approach and Supreme Documents Islamic Azad University, Qazvin Branch]. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Providing-a-Model-for-the-Performance-Evaluation-of-Jesarati-Khadivi/d1f29824b778b45a71486c8b1944774626f985e8
19. Mir Kamali, S. M., & Saadati Taba, F. (2015). Investigating the Satisfaction of Stakeholders with the In-Service Training Process in the Industrial Development and Renovation Organization of Iran. Human Resources Training & Development, 7(3), 101-123. http://istd.saminatech.ir/en/Article/29372/FullText
20. Nazari Ardabili, S. Z., Benisi, P., & Vatankhah, H. (2024). Designing the Maturity Management Model of Educational Technology in Iranian Schools. Sociology of Education, 10(1), 314-326. [DOI:10.22034/ijes.2024.2022649.1536]
21. Niaz Azari, K., & Taghvai Yazdi, M. (2016). Organizational Culture in the Third Millennium. Shiveh Publishing.
22. Rasouli, M., Tari, G., & Baghaei, H. (2024). Structural Modeling of School Managers' Competencies as a Driver for Sustainable Development [Research Article]. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 7(2), 124-131. [DOI:10.61838/kman.ijes.7.2.15]
23. Saeedi Moghadam, M. R., Abdollahi, B., Noh Ebrahim, A., & Zeinabadi, H. R. (2022). Compilation and Validation of Factors, Criteria and Signs of Ranking of First Secondary Schools in Karaj Kharazmi University].
24. Salman Al-Oda, A. H., Sadeghi, M., Al-Murshidi, R. H. A., & Sharifi, S. (2024). Investigating the Relationship Between Talent Management Implementation Categories in the Basra Province Education Organization [Research Article]. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 7(1), 1-9. [DOI:10.61838/kman.ijes.7.1.1]
25. Sharifi Golzardi, F., Mohabi, A., & Karimi Khoeigani, R. (2024). Identifying Components of Economic Education in Middle School. Sociology of Education and Training, 10(1), 73-82. https://www.iase-jrn.ir/article_711122.html?lang=en
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
