Volume 6, Issue 3 (Autumn 2023)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023, 6(3): 98-107 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khorsandi Pishkenari S, Mehrabi J, Davari A. (2023). Drawing a Scientific Map of the Knowledge-Based Businesses Development with a Bibliometric Approach. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(3), 98-107. doi:10.61186/ijes.6.3.98
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1296-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1296-en.html
1- PhD student, Department of Entrepreneurship, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
2- Faculty Member, Department of Public Administration, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Faculty member, Department of Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2- Faculty Member, Department of Public Administration, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Faculty member, Department of Entrepreneurship, Faculty of Entrepreneurship, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (589 Views)
Purpose: Today, having knowledge-based organizations and businesses is considered an important and main capital for a country and can create a competitive advantage. As a result, the aim of this study was to drawing a scientific map of the knowledge-based businesses development with a bibliometric approach.
Methodology: The current research in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was descriptive. The population of this study was the conducted research in the field of knowledge-based business development in the Scopus database from 1985 to 2023 year. The data of this study were analyzed by the bibliometric method according to the systematic approach with the two objectives of functional analysis and citation network analysis and with PRISMA protocol in VOSViewer software.
Findings: The functional analysis findings showed that in the field of knowledge-based businesses development, Gambardella and McGahan had the most citations (372 times) with an article entitled Business-model innovation: General purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure. Also, authors including Crenicean, Ichijo, Kohlbacher, Markopoulos, Popescu, Sequeira, Vanharanta and Will and countries including United Kingdom, China, United States, Germany, Italy, Romania and South Korea respectively had the most research in the field of knowledge-based businesses development. In addition, the findings of the citation network analysis showed that for collaboration between authors there were 21 links, 7 keywords and 1 cluster and for collaboration between countries there were 34 links, 22 keywords and 5 clusters. Also, for co-referencing words there were 1475 links, 138 keywords and 6 clusters, which were more related to the words of business development, knowledge-based systems, innovation and knowledge management.
Conclusion: The results of the present research about the knowledge-based businesses development with a bibliometric approach can have an effective role in designing and implementing programs to improve knowledge-based businesses.
Methodology: The current research in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was descriptive. The population of this study was the conducted research in the field of knowledge-based business development in the Scopus database from 1985 to 2023 year. The data of this study were analyzed by the bibliometric method according to the systematic approach with the two objectives of functional analysis and citation network analysis and with PRISMA protocol in VOSViewer software.
Findings: The functional analysis findings showed that in the field of knowledge-based businesses development, Gambardella and McGahan had the most citations (372 times) with an article entitled Business-model innovation: General purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure. Also, authors including Crenicean, Ichijo, Kohlbacher, Markopoulos, Popescu, Sequeira, Vanharanta and Will and countries including United Kingdom, China, United States, Germany, Italy, Romania and South Korea respectively had the most research in the field of knowledge-based businesses development. In addition, the findings of the citation network analysis showed that for collaboration between authors there were 21 links, 7 keywords and 1 cluster and for collaboration between countries there were 34 links, 22 keywords and 5 clusters. Also, for co-referencing words there were 1475 links, 138 keywords and 6 clusters, which were more related to the words of business development, knowledge-based systems, innovation and knowledge management.
Conclusion: The results of the present research about the knowledge-based businesses development with a bibliometric approach can have an effective role in designing and implementing programs to improve knowledge-based businesses.
Keywords: scientific map, businesses development, knowledge-based businesses, bibliometric approach, innovation, knowledge management
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/04/6 | Accepted: 2023/07/18 | Published: 2023/12/1
Received: 2023/04/6 | Accepted: 2023/07/18 | Published: 2023/12/1
References
1. Carayannis EG, Ferreira JJM, Jalali MS, Ferreira FAF. (2018). MCDA in knowledge-based economies: Methodological developments and real world applications. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 131: 1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.028 [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.028]
2. Centobelli P, Cerchione R, Esposito E. (2017). Knowledge management in startups: Systematic literature review and future research agenda. Sustainability. 9(361): 1-19. doi: 10.3390/su9030361 [DOI:10.3390/su9030361]
3. Chowdhury S, Budhwar P, Dey PK, Joel-Edgar S, Abadie A. (2022). AI-employee collaboration and business performance: Integrating knowledge-based view, socio-technical systems and organisational socialisation framework. Journal of Business Research. 144: 31-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.069 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.069]
4. Clarke AH, Mortensen B, Freytag PV. (2023). Knowledge intensive business service (KIBS) firms' use of visualization for customer participation and knowledge sharing during the service process. Industrial Marketing Management. 109: 32-43. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.12.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.12.004]
5. Consoli D, Elche-Hortelano D. (2010). Variety in the knowledge base of knowledge intensive business services. Research Policy. 39(10): 1303-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.005 [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2010.08.005]
6. Dias S, Espadinha-Cruz P, Matos F. (2022). Understanding how Additive Manufacturing influences organizations' strategy in knowledge economy. Procedia Computer Science. 200: 1318-1327. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.333 [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.333]
7. Duque J, Godinho A, Vasconcelos J. (2022). Knowledge data extraction for business intelligence A design science research approach. Procedia Computer Science. 204: 131-139. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.016 [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2022.08.016]
8. Gambardella A, McGahan AM. (2010). Business-model innovation: General purpose technologies and their implications for industry structure. Long Range Planning. 43(2-3): 262-271. doi: 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.009 [DOI:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.009]
9. Gorman GG, Rosa PJ, Faseruk A. (2005). Institutional lending to knowledge-based businesses. Journal of Business Venturing. 20(6): 793-819. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.04.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.04.002]
10. Jalali Naini SGh, Aliahmadi AR, Jafari-Eskandari M. (2011). Designing a mixed performance measurement system for environmental supply chain management using evolutionary game theory and balanced scorecard: A case study of an auto industry supply chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 55(6): 593-603. doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.10.008 [DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.10.008]
11. Khishtandar S, Danesh Shakib M. (2020). Motivational patterns of entrepreneurs in science-based new venture creation. Journal of Science & Technology Policy. 11(4): 47-62. [Persian] doi: 10.22034/jstp.2020.11.4.1101
12. Kim TT, Kim WG, Park SSS, Lee G, Jee B. (2012). Intellectual capital and business performance: What structural relationships do they have in upper-upscale hotels? International Journal of Tourism Research. 14(4): 391-408. doi: 10.1002/jtr.1868 [DOI:10.1002/jtr.1868]
13. Kulanthaivel G, Ulagamuthalvi V. (2020). Role of technical teacher training institution in a knowledge based economy. Procedia Computer Science. 172: 1096-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.159 [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.159]
14. Lee JN, Ham J, Choi B. (2016). Effect of government data openness on a knowledge-based economy. Procedia Computer Science. 91: 158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.053 [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.053]
15. Mason J. (2018). Entrepreneurship in knowledge-based services: Opportunity and challenges for new venture, economic, and workforce development. Journal of Business Venturing Insights. 10: e00092. doi: 10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00092 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00092]
16. Minbaeva DB. (2013). Strategic HRM in building micro-foundations of organizational knowledge-based performance. Human Resource Management Review. 23(4): 378-390. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.10.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.hrmr.2012.10.001]
17. Munoz-Pascual L, Curado C, Galende J. (2019). The triple bottom line on sustainable product innovation performance in SMEs: A mixed methods approach. Sustainability. 11(1689): 1-22. doi: 10.3390/su11061689 [DOI:10.3390/su11061689]
18. Nicolaescu SS, Florea A, Kifor CV, Fiore U, Cocan N, Receu I, Zanetti P. (2020). Human capital evaluation in knowledge-based organizations based on big data analytics. Future Generation Computer Systems. 111: 654-667. doi: 10.1016/j.future.2019.09.048 [DOI:10.1016/j.future.2019.09.048]
19. Peng D, Li R, Shen C, Wong Z. (2022). Industrial agglomeration, urban characteristics, and economic growth quality: The case of knowledge-intensive business services. International Review of Economics & Finance. 81: 18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.iref.2022.05.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.iref.2022.05.001]
20. Shakeri R, Ajang MR. (2022). Develop an enabling framework for strategic agility in IT knowledge-based businesses. Scientific-Research Quarterly Journal of Strategic Management Studies of National Defense Studies. 6(22): 45-72. [Persian]
21. Trzcielinski S. (2015). The influence of knowledge based economy on agility of enterprise. Procedia Manufacturing. 3: 6615-6623. doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.11.001]
22. Vaccaro A, Parente R, Veloso FM. (2010). Knowledge management tools, inter-organizational relationships, innovation and firm performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 77(7): 1076-1089. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.02.006 [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2010.02.006]
23. Vaio AD, Hasan S, Palladino R, Profita F, Mejri I. (2021). Understanding knowledge hiding in business organizations: A bibliometric analysis of research trends, 1988-2020. Journal of Business Research. 134: 560-573. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.040 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.040]
24. Vonder Gracht HA, Vennemann CR, Darkow IL. (2010). Corporate foresight and innovation management: A portfolio-approach in evaluating organizational development. Futures. 42(4): 380-393. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.023 [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2009.11.023]
25. Vu OTK, Alonso AD, Tran TD, Nicholson GJ. (2023). Illuminating the dark kitchen business model - A knowledge-based perspective from the supply-side. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 55: 318-331. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.04.013 [DOI:10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.04.013]
26. Wolfert J, Verdouw CN, Verloop CM, Beulens AJM. (2010). Organizing information integration in agri-food-A method based on a service-oriented architecture and living lab approach. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 70(2): 389-405. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2009.07.015 [DOI:10.1016/j.compag.2009.07.015]
27. Wu LC, Ong CS, Hsu YW. (2008). Knowledge-based organization evaluation. Decision Support Systems. 45(3): 541-549. doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2007.06.013 [DOI:10.1016/j.dss.2007.06.013]
28. Yu D, Yan H. (2021). Relationship between knowledge base and innovation-driven growth: Moderated by organizational character. Frontiers in Psychology. 12(663317): 1-14. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663317 [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.663317]
29. Yun JJ, Won D, Jeong E, Park KB, Yang J, Park JY. (2016). The relationship between technology, business model, and market in autonomous car and intelligent robot industries. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 103: 142-155. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.016 [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.016]
30. Zeng X, Gong R, Chen WQ, Li J. (2016). Uncovering the recycling potential of "new" WEEE in China. Environmental Science and Technology. 50(3): 1347-1358. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b05446 [DOI:10.1021/acs.est.5b05446]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
