Volume 6, Issue 3 (Autumn 2023)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023, 6(3): 43-61 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Darabi T, Shariatmadari M, Mahmoodi A H. (2023). Designing the Resilience Pattern of Higher Education Institutions in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic based on Grounded Theory. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(3), 43-61. doi:10.61186/ijes.6.3.43
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1298-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1298-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Educational Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Education and Higher Education Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Education and Higher Education Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Education and Higher Education Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Education and Higher Education Management, Central Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (1163 Views)
Purpose: The Covid-19 pandemic has presented unprecedented challenges to higher education institutions, necessitating a robust resilience framework to navigate disruptions and ensure continued educational excellence. This study aimed to design a resilience pattern for higher education institutions based on grounded theory, drawing insights from the experiences of stakeholders in Islamic Azad Universities in Tehran, Iran.
Methodology: The present study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was qualitative. The target population was all students, employees, and faculty members of Islamic Azad Universities in Tehran, Iran. The sample size of this study was determined based on the principle of theoretical saturation, resulting in a total of 29 participants who were selected by the purposive and theoretical sampling method and were underwent to a semi-structured interview. Interview validity was established using triangulation, and reliability was assessed using the intercoder agreement coefficient method, yielding a value of 0.72. The data obtained from semi-structured interviews were analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding techniques in ATLAS.ti qualitative software version 9.
Findings: The analysis showed that the resilience pattern of higher education institutions in response to the Covid-19 pandemic had 189 concepts, 39 subcategories and 10 main categories based on the systematic grounded theory. In this pattern, the central phenomenon was the resilient response of higher education institutions to the Covid-19 pandemic. Causal conditions were categorized into three main categories: individual (6 subcategories, 29 concepts), organizational (7 subcategories, 41 concepts), and social (3 subcategories, 11 concepts). Intervening conditions consisted of national factors (4 subcategories, 18 concepts), while context were represented by global factors (4 subcategories, 16 concepts). Strategies included prediction and prevention (3 subcategories, 17 concepts), response and coping (5 subcategories, 24 concepts), and adaptation and compatibility (3 subcategories, 18 concepts). Consequences were classified into short-term (2 subcategories, 8 concepts) and long-term consequences (2 subcategories, 7 concepts). Finally, the resilience pattern of higher education institutions in response to the Covid-19 pandemic based on grounded theory was designed.
Conclusion: The proposed resilience pattern serves as a valuable guide for higher education institutions to proactively address the challenges posed by unforeseen disruptions, fostering adaptability and sustainability in an increasingly volatile world. The framework emphasizes the importance of resilience not only at the organizational level but also among students, staff, and faculty members. By incorporating this pattern into their strategic planning and operational practices, higher education institutions can enhance their capacity to navigate crises such as Covid-19 pandemic and emerge stronger amidst adversity.
Methodology: The present study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was qualitative. The target population was all students, employees, and faculty members of Islamic Azad Universities in Tehran, Iran. The sample size of this study was determined based on the principle of theoretical saturation, resulting in a total of 29 participants who were selected by the purposive and theoretical sampling method and were underwent to a semi-structured interview. Interview validity was established using triangulation, and reliability was assessed using the intercoder agreement coefficient method, yielding a value of 0.72. The data obtained from semi-structured interviews were analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding techniques in ATLAS.ti qualitative software version 9.
Findings: The analysis showed that the resilience pattern of higher education institutions in response to the Covid-19 pandemic had 189 concepts, 39 subcategories and 10 main categories based on the systematic grounded theory. In this pattern, the central phenomenon was the resilient response of higher education institutions to the Covid-19 pandemic. Causal conditions were categorized into three main categories: individual (6 subcategories, 29 concepts), organizational (7 subcategories, 41 concepts), and social (3 subcategories, 11 concepts). Intervening conditions consisted of national factors (4 subcategories, 18 concepts), while context were represented by global factors (4 subcategories, 16 concepts). Strategies included prediction and prevention (3 subcategories, 17 concepts), response and coping (5 subcategories, 24 concepts), and adaptation and compatibility (3 subcategories, 18 concepts). Consequences were classified into short-term (2 subcategories, 8 concepts) and long-term consequences (2 subcategories, 7 concepts). Finally, the resilience pattern of higher education institutions in response to the Covid-19 pandemic based on grounded theory was designed.
Conclusion: The proposed resilience pattern serves as a valuable guide for higher education institutions to proactively address the challenges posed by unforeseen disruptions, fostering adaptability and sustainability in an increasingly volatile world. The framework emphasizes the importance of resilience not only at the organizational level but also among students, staff, and faculty members. By incorporating this pattern into their strategic planning and operational practices, higher education institutions can enhance their capacity to navigate crises such as Covid-19 pandemic and emerge stronger amidst adversity.
Keywords: Resilience, Higher Education, Covid-19 Pandemic, Individual Factors, Organizational Factors, Social Factors
References
1. Abdullah M, Husin NA, Haider A. (2020). Development of post-pandemic covid19 higher education resilience framework in Malaysia. Archives of Business Research. 8(5): 201-210. [DOI:10.14738/abr.85.8321]
2. Alexander B, Ashford-Rowe K, Barajas-Murphy N, Dobbin G, Knott J, McCormack M, et al. (2019). Educause Horizon report: 2019 Higher Education edition. Ohio River: Louisville Publisher,
3. Ang WHD, Shorey S, Lopez V, Chew HSJ, Lau Y. (2022). Generation Z undergraduate students' resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. Current Psychology. 41(11): 8132-8146. [DOI:10.1007/s12144-021-01830-4] [PMID] []
4. Appolloni A, Colasanti N, Fantauzzi C, Fiorani G, Frondizi R. (2021). Distance learning as a resilience strategy during Covid-19: An analysis of the Italian context. Sustainability. 13(1388): 1-12. [DOI:10.3390/su13031388]
5. Ayebi-Arthur K. (2017). E-learning, resilience and change in higher education: Helping a university cope after a natural disaster. E-Learning and Digital Media. 14(5): 259-274. [DOI:10.1177/2042753017751712]
6. Bao W. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies. 2(2): 113-115. [DOI:10.1002/hbe2.191] [PMID] []
7. Bartuseviciene I, Pazaver A, Kitada M. (2021). Building a resilient university: ensuring academic continuity-transition from face-to-face to online in the COVID-19 pandemic. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs. 20(2): 151-172. [DOI:10.1007/s13437-021-00239-x] []
8. Baumber A, Allen L, Key T, Kligyte G, Melvold J, Pratt S. (2021). Teaching resilience: Enabling factors for effective responses to covid-19. Student Success. 12(2): 1-12. [DOI:10.5204/ssj.1773]
9. Bento F, Giglio Bottino A, Cerchiareto Pereira F, Forastieri De Almeida J, Gomes Rodrigues F. (2021). Resilience in higher education: A complex perspective to lecturers' adaptive processes in response to the covid-19 pandemic. Education Sciences. 11(492): 1-15. [DOI:10.3390/educsci11090492]
10. Bhagat S, Kim DJ. (2020). Higher education amidst COVID-19: Challenges and silver lining. Information Systems Management. 37(4): 366-371. [DOI:10.1080/10580530.2020.1824040]
11. Bozkurt A. (2022). Resilience, adaptability, and sustainability of higher education: A systematic mapping study on the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the transition to the new normal. Journal of Learning for Development. 9(1): 1-16. [DOI:10.56059/jl4d.v9i1.590]
12. Bozkurt A, Sharma RC. (2021). On the verge of a new renaissance: Care and empathy oriented, human-centered pandemic pedagogy. Asian Journal of Distance Education. 16(1): 1-12.
13. Bryson JR, Andres L. (2020). Covid-19 and rapid adoption and improvisation of online teaching: curating resources for extensive versus intensive online learning experiences. Journal of Geography in Higher Education. 44(4): 608-623. [DOI:10.1080/03098265.2020.1807478]
14. Chan AKM, Nickson CP, Rudolph JW, Lee A, Joynt GM. (2020). Social media for rapid knowledge dissemination: Early experience from the COVID-19 pandemic. Anaesthesia. 75(12): 1579-1582. [DOI:10.1111/anae.15057] [PMID] []
15. Chang CL, Fang M. (2020). E-learning and online instructions of higher education during the 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) epidemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574(1): 1-5. [DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1574/1/012166]
16. Coutu DL. (2002). How resilience works. Harvard Business Review. 80(5): 46-51.
17. Creswell JW. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches. India: In News Ge Publisher.
18. Dawadi S, Giri RA, Simkhada P. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the education sector in Nepal: Challenges and coping strategies. Advance: A SAGE Preprints Community. 3: 1-16. [DOI:10.31124/advance.12344336.v1]
19. Delos Reyes EJ, Blannin J, Cohrssen C, Mahat M. (2022). Resilience of higher education academics in the time of 21st century pandemics: A narrative review. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. 44(1): 39-56. [DOI:10.1080/1360080X.2021.1989736]
20. Dohaney J, De Roiste M, Salmon RA, Sutherland K. (2020). Benefits, barriers, and incentives for improved resilience to disruption in university teaching. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. 50(101691): 1-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101691] [PMID] []
21. Duchek S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research. 13(1): 215-246. [DOI:10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7]
22. Eringfeld S. (2020). Higher education and its post-coronial future: utopian hopes and dystopian fears at Cambridge University during Covid-19. Studies in Higher Education. 1(1): 1-12. [DOI:10.1080/03075079.2020.1859681]
23. Eri R, Gudimetla P, Star S, Rowlands J, Girgla A. (2021). Digital resilience in higher education in response to covid-19 pandemic: Student perceptions from asia and australia. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice: 18(5): 1-28. [DOI:10.53761/1.18.5.7]
24. Escrigas C. (2016). A higher calling for higher education. Great Transition Initiative: Toward a Transformative Vision and Praxis. 6: 1-12.
25. Kantur D, Iseri-Say A. (2012). Organizational resilience: A conceptual integrative framework. Journal of Management & Organization. 18(6): 762-773. [DOI:10.1017/S1833367200000420]
26. Lagat K. (2021). Factors affecting teachers' resiliency amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal. 9(1): 133-145. [DOI:10.32871/rmrj2109.01.12]
27. Latif Sellami A, Sawalhi R, Henry Romanowski M, Amatullah T. (2019). Definitions of educational leadership-Arab educators' perspectives. International Journal of Leadership in Education. 25(5): 767-786. [DOI:10.1080/13603124.2019.1690701]
28. Mseleku Z. (2020). A literature review of e-learning and e-teaching in the era of covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. 5(10): 588-597.
29. Nandy M, Lodh S, Tang A. (2021). Lessons from Covid-19 and a resilience model for higher education. Industry and Higher Education. 35(1): 3-9. [DOI:10.1177/0950422220962696]
30. Oshio A, Taku K, Hirano M, Saeed G. (2018). Resilience and big five personality traits: A meta-analysis. Personality and Individual Differences. 127(17): 54-60. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.048]
31. Ostadtaghizadeh A, Ardalan A, Paton D, Khankeh H, Jabbari H. (2016). Community disaster resilience: a qualitative study on Iranian concepts and indicators. Natural Hazards. 83(3): 1843-1861. [DOI:10.1007/s11069-016-2377-y]
32. Peimani N, Kamalipour H. (2021). Online education and the covid-19 outbreak: A case study of online teaching during lockdown. Education Sciences. 11(2): 1-16. [DOI:10.3390/educsci11020072]
33. Raghunathan S, Darshan Singh A, Sharma B. (2022). Study of resilience in learning environments during the Covid-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education. 6(677625): 1-9. [DOI:10.3389/feduc.2021.677625]
34. Rajkumar RP. (2020). COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 52(102066): 1-5. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102066] [PMID] []
35. Reese S. (2018). Team of teams: New rules of engagement for a complex world. The Learning Organization. 25(4): 288-291. [DOI:10.1108/TLO-02-2018-0019]
36. Sailer M, Schultz-Pernice F, Fischer F. (2021). Contextual facilitators for learning activities involving technology in higher education: The C♭-model. Computers in Human Behavior. 121: 106794. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2021.106794]
37. Sezen-Gultekin G, Argon T. (2020). Examination of the relationship between organizational resilience and organizational sustainability at higher education institution. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction. 12: 329-343.
38. Sharma G, Yukhymenko-Lescroart MA. (2022). Life purpose as a predictor of resilience and persistence in college students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice. 1: 1-21. [DOI:10.1177/15210251221076828] []
39. Shaya N, Abu Khait R, Madani R, Khattak MN. (2022). Organizational resilience of higher education institutions: An empirical study during Covid-19 pandemic. Higher Education Policy. 36(3): 1-27. [DOI:10.1057/s41307-022-00272-2] []
40. Tandon R. (2020). COVID-19 and mental health: Preserving humanity, maintaining sanity, and promoting health. Asian Journal of Psychiatry. 51: 2018-2020. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102256] [PMID] []
41. Vidal-Melia L, Estrada M, Monferrer D, Rodriguez-Sanchez A. (2022). Does mindfulness influence academic performance? The role of resilience in education for sustainable development. Sustainability. 14(4251): 1-12. [DOI:10.3390/su14074251]
42. Wadi MM, Nordin NI, Roslan NS, Tan C, Yusoff MSB. (2020). Reframing resilience concept: Insights from a meta-synthesis of 21 resilience scales. Education in Medicine Journal. 12(2): 3-22. [DOI:10.21315/eimj2020.12.2.2]
43. Waller RE, Lemoine PA, McCormack TJ, Garretson CJ, Richardson MD. (2020). Resiliency: A necessary skill for global higher education leaders during Covid-19. International Journal of Education Humanities and Social Science. 2(03): 47-56.
44. Waller RE, Lemoine PA, Mense EG, Garretson CJ, Richardson MD. (2019). Global Higher Education in a VUCA World. Concerns and Projections. 3(2): 73-83. [DOI:10.20849/jed.v3i2.613]
45. Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, Lui LMW, Gill H, Phan L, et al. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders. 277: 55-64. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001] [PMID] []
46. Yokus G. (2022). Developing a guiding model of educational leadership in higher education during the covid-19 pandemic: A grounded theory study. Participatory Educational Research. 9(1): 362-387. [DOI:10.17275/per.22.20.9.1]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
