Volume 7, Issue 2 (8-2024)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2024, 7(2): 72-84 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Haseli Songhori M, Salamti K. (2024). The Linkage Between University Students’ Academic Engagement and Academic Support: The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 7(2), 72-84. doi:10.61838/kman.ijes.7.2.10
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1367-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1367-en.html
1- Department of English, Faculty of Humanities, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran.
2- Department of English, Resalat Campus, Farhangian University of Zahedan, Zahedan, Iran.
2- Department of English, Resalat Campus, Farhangian University of Zahedan, Zahedan, Iran.
Abstract: (540 Views)
Purpose: Despite the importance of university students' academic engagement and the role of academic support in facilitating their success, there appears to be a dearth of research investigating the mediating effect of psychological capital in this relationship, highlighting a significant gap in the existing literature.
Methodology: This research was quantitative on the basis of the natural and general features and employed a descriptive-correlational approach based on the structural equation model (SEM). The statistical population of the research included all undergraduate students of Farhangian University of Kerman, approximately 2100 students. Out of this statistical population, 677 participants responded to the online survey. The sampling method was convenience sampling and the data was collected in the first semester of the academic year 1401-1402 (From Aban to Azar). Sands and Plunkett’s (2005) academic support scale, Reeve and Tseng’s (2011) academic engagement scale, and Luthans and Avolio’s (2007) psychological capital scale were used to gather data. The statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 23.0 and AMOS 23.0. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the validity of the scales used in the Iranian tertiary context. Correlational results indicated that the relationships among main research variables were significant.
Findings: Structural equation modelling (SEM) indicated that psychological capital mediated the linkage between academic support and academic engagement (β = 0.58, p < 0.01). The results also revealed that academic support (β = 0.69, p < 0.01) and psychological capital (β = 0.39, p < 0.01) were predictive of university students’ academic engagement.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicated that providing academic support has the potential to influence students' psychological capital, resulting in their active engagement and participation in educational and learning endeavors. The limitations of this study and the future directions will be discussed.
Methodology: This research was quantitative on the basis of the natural and general features and employed a descriptive-correlational approach based on the structural equation model (SEM). The statistical population of the research included all undergraduate students of Farhangian University of Kerman, approximately 2100 students. Out of this statistical population, 677 participants responded to the online survey. The sampling method was convenience sampling and the data was collected in the first semester of the academic year 1401-1402 (From Aban to Azar). Sands and Plunkett’s (2005) academic support scale, Reeve and Tseng’s (2011) academic engagement scale, and Luthans and Avolio’s (2007) psychological capital scale were used to gather data. The statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 23.0 and AMOS 23.0. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the validity of the scales used in the Iranian tertiary context. Correlational results indicated that the relationships among main research variables were significant.
Findings: Structural equation modelling (SEM) indicated that psychological capital mediated the linkage between academic support and academic engagement (β = 0.58, p < 0.01). The results also revealed that academic support (β = 0.69, p < 0.01) and psychological capital (β = 0.39, p < 0.01) were predictive of university students’ academic engagement.
Conclusion: The findings of this study indicated that providing academic support has the potential to influence students' psychological capital, resulting in their active engagement and participation in educational and learning endeavors. The limitations of this study and the future directions will be discussed.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/12/11 | Accepted: 2024/04/15 | Published: 2024/05/12
Received: 2023/12/11 | Accepted: 2024/04/15 | Published: 2024/05/12
References
1. Albright, J. N., & Hurd, N. M. (2018). Constellations of social support among underrepresented college students: Associations with mental health. Applied Developmental Science, 22(4), 258-269. [DOI:10.1080/10888691.2017.1287568]
2. Asiamah, N., Mensah, H., & Oteng-Abayie, E. F. (2017). General, target, and accessible population: Demystifying the concepts for effective sampling. The Qualitative Report, 22(6), 1607-1621. https://repository.essex.ac.uk/32313/ [DOI:10.46743/2160-3715/2017.2674]
3. Bandura, A. (2002). Social Cognitive Theory in Cultural Context. Applied Psychology, 51(2), 269-290. [DOI:10.1111/1464-0597.00092]
4. Bunijevac, M. (2017). Parental involvement as a important factor for successful education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(3), 137-153. http://www.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/article/view/291 [DOI:10.26529/cepsj.291]
5. Carmona-Halty, M., Salanova, M., Llorens, S., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Linking positive emotions and academic performance: The mediated role of academic psychological capital and academic engagement. Current Psychology, 40(6), 2938-2947. [DOI:10.1007/s12144-019-00227-8]
6. Chaffin, T. D., Luthans, B. C., & Luthans, K. W. (2023). Integrity, positive psychological capital and academic performance. Journal of Management Development, 42(2), 93-105. [DOI:10.1108/JMD-07-2022-0162]
7. Champ, R. E., Adamou, M., & Tolchard, B. (2023). Seeking connection, autonomy, and emotional feedback: A self-determination theory of self-regulation in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Psychological review, 130(3), 569-603. [DOI:10.1037/rev0000398] [PMID]
8. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1991-97029-002
9. Datu, J. A. D., & Valdez, J. P. M. (2016). Psychological Capital Predicts Academic Engagement and Well-Being in Filipino High School Students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 25(3), 399-405. [DOI:10.1007/s40299-015-0254-1]
10. Farhadi, A., Ghadampour, E., & Chehri, P. (2016). Predictions dimensions of academic engagement based capital components psychological. Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 9(2), 127-133. http://edcbmj.ir/browse.php?a_id=969&slc_lang=en&sid=1&printcase=1&hbnr=1&hmb=1
11. Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1-4. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959475216300159 [DOI:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002]
12. Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Chapter One - Positive Emotions Broaden and Build. In P. Devine & A. Plant (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 47, pp. 1-53). Academic Press.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00001-2 [DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00001-2]
13. Giannakos, M., & Cukurova, M. (2023). The role of learning theory in multimodal learning analytics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 54(5), 1246-1267. [DOI:10.1111/bjet.13320]
14. González-Cutre, D., Sicilia, Á., Sierra, A. C., Ferriz, R., & Hagger, M. S. (2016). Understanding the need for novelty from the perspective of self-determination theory. Personality and individual differences, 102, 159-169. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886916307863 [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.036]
15. Gorgens-Ekermans, G., & Herbert, M. (2013). Psychological capital: Internal and external validity of the Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ-24) on a South African sample. Sa Journal of Industrial Psychology, 39(2), 1-12. https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC144503 [DOI:10.4102/sajip.v39i2.1131]
16. Groves, M., Sellars, C., Smith, J., & Barber, A. (2015). Factors affecting student engagement: a case study examining two cohorts of students attending a post-1992 university in the United Kingdom. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 27-37. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1060577 [DOI:10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p27]
17. Jelas, Z. M., Azman, N., Zulnaidi, H., & Ahmad, N. A. (2016). Learning support and academic achievement among Malaysian adolescents: the mediating role of student engagement. Learning Environments Research, 19(2), 221-240. [DOI:10.1007/s10984-015-9202-5]
18. Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships Matter: Linking Teacher Support to Student Engagement and Achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273. [DOI:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x] [PMID]
19. Lee, J., Song, H.-D., & Hong, A. J. (2019). Exploring Factors, and Indicators for Measuring Students' Sustainable Engagement in e-Learning. Sustainability, 11(4), 985. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/4/985 [DOI:10.3390/su11040985]
20. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., Avey, J. B., & Norman, S. M. (2007). POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL: MEASUREMENT AND RELATIONSHIP WITH PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION. Personnel psychology, 60(3), 541-572. [DOI:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x]
21. Luthans, F., & Youssef-Morgan, C. M. (2017). Psychological Capital: An Evidence-Based Positive Approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(Volume 4, 2017), 339-366. https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324 [DOI:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113324]
22. Luthans, K. W., Luthans, B. C., & Chaffin, T. D. (2019). Refining Grit in Academic Performance: The Mediational Role of Psychological Capital. Journal of Management Education, 43(1), 35-61. [DOI:10.1177/1052562918804282]
23. Malecki, C. K., & Demaray, M. K. (2003). What Type of Support Do They Need? Investigating Student Adjustment as Related to Emotional, Informational, Appraisal, and Instrumental Support. School Psychology Quarterly, 18(3), 231-252. [DOI:10.1521/scpq.18.3.231.22576]
24. Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267-281. [DOI:10.1002/pits.20149]
25. Martínez, I. M., Youssef-Morgan, C. M., Chambel, M. J., & Marques-Pinto, A. (2019). Antecedents of academic performance of university students: academic engagement and psychological capital resources. Educational Psychology, 39(8), 1047-1067. [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2019.1623382]
26. Meneghel, I., Martínez, I. M., Salanova, M., & de Witte, H. (2019). Promoting academic satisfaction and performance: Building academic resilience through coping strategies. Psychology in the Schools, 56(6), 875-890. [DOI:10.1002/pits.22253]
27. Miller, A. L., Fassett, K. T., & Palmer, D. L. (2021). Achievement goal orientation: A predictor of student engagement in higher education. Motivation and Emotion, 45(3), 327-344. [DOI:10.1007/s11031-021-09881-7]
28. Newman, A., Ucbasaran, D., Zhu, F., & Hirst, G. (2014). Psychological capital: A review and synthesis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(S1), S120-S138. [DOI:10.1002/job.1916]
29. Oriol-Granado, X., Mendoza-Lira, M., Covarrubias-Apablaza, C.-G., & Molina-López, V.-M. (2017). Emociones positivas, apoyo a la autonomía y rendimiento de estudiantes universitarios: el papel mediador del compromiso académico y la autoeficacia. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 22(1), 45-53. [DOI:10.1016/S1136-1034(17)30043-6]
30. Parsons, J., & Taylor, L. (2011). Improving student engagement. Current issues in education, 14(1). http://cie.asu.edu/ojs/index.php/cieatasu/article/view/745
31. Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In International handbook of emotions in education (pp. 120-141). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9780203148211-8/control-value-theory-achievement-emotions-reinhard-pekrun-raymond-perry
32. Phung, L. (2017). Task preference, affective response, and engagement in L2 use in a US university context. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 751-766. [DOI:10.1177/1362168816683561]
33. Plunkett, S. W., Henry, C. S., Houltberg, B. J., Sands, T., & Abarca-Mortensen, S. (2008). Academic Support by Significant Others and Educational Resilience in Mexican-Origin Ninth Grade Students From Intact Families. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 28(3), 333-355. [DOI:10.1177/0272431608314660]
34. Poots, A., & Cassidy, T. (2020). Academic expectation, self-compassion, psychological capital, social support and student wellbeing. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101506. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0883035519312947 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101506]
35. Preston, A., Rew, L., & Young, C. C. (2023). A Systematic Scoping Review of Psychological Capital Related to Mental Health in Youth. The Journal of School Nursing, 39(1), 72-86. [DOI:10.1177/10598405211060415] [PMID]
36. Ramadhani, D. P., & Sagita, D. D. (2022). Academic Resilience of Students in The Limited Face to Face Learning Period (PTM-T). Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(4), 519-527. http://www.jiecr.org/index.php/jiecr/article/view/210 [DOI:10.46843/jiecr.v3i4.210]
37. Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579-595. [DOI:10.1037/a0032690]
38. Reeve, J., Cheon, S. H., & Jang, H. (2020). How and why students make academic progress: Reconceptualizing the student engagement construct to increase its explanatory power. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 62, 101899. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X20300643 [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101899]
39. Reeve, J., & Shin, S. H. (2020). How teachers can support students' agentic engagement. Theory Into Practice, 59(2), 150-161. [DOI:10.1080/00405841.2019.1702451]
40. Reeve, J., & Tseng, C.-M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students' engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257-267. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X11000191 [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002]
41. Robayo-Tamayo, M., Blanco-Donoso, L. M., Román, F. J., Carmona-Cobo, I., Moreno-Jiménez, B., & Garrosa, E. (2020). Academic engagement: A diary study on the mediating role of academic support. Learning and Individual Differences, 80, 101887. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101887]
42. Romano, L., Angelini, G., Consiglio, P., & Fiorilli, C. (2021). Academic Resilience and Engagement in High School Students: The Mediating Role of Perceived Teacher Emotional Support. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 11(2), 334-344. https://www.mdpi.com/2254-9625/11/2/25 [DOI:10.3390/ejihpe11020025] [PMID] []
43. Sadoughi, M., & Hejazi, S. Y. (2021). Teacher support and academic engagement among EFL learners: The role of positive academic emotions. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101060. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X21000869 [DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101060]
44. Saleem, M. S., Isha, A. S. N., Awan, M. I., Yusop, Y. B., & Naji, G. M. A. (2022). Fostering Academic Engagement in Post-graduate Students: Assessing the Role of Positive Emotions, Positive Psychology, and Stress [Original Research]. Frontiers in psychology, 13. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920395] [PMID] []
45. Sands, T., & Plunkett, S. W. (2005). A New Scale to Measure Adolescent Reports of Academic Support by Mothers, Fathers, Teachers, and Friends in Latino Immigrant Families. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 27(2), 244-253. [DOI:10.1177/0739986304273968]
46. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X19304370 [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101832]
47. Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement Goal Theory at the Crossroads: Old Controversies, Current Challenges, and New Directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26-47. [DOI:10.1080/00461520.2011.538646]
48. Sezgin, F., & Erdogan, O. (2015). Academic optimism, hope and zest for work as predictors of teacher self-efficacy and perceived success. Educational Sciences-Theory & Practice, 15(1). https://avesis.gazi.edu.tr/yayin/66ac21f4-2d64-4e8c-95f5-ca9c0e3866b7/academic-optimism-hope-and-zest-for-work-as-predictors-of-teacher-self-efficacy-and-perceived-success
49. Skinner, E. A., Rickert, N. P., Vollet, J. W., & Kindermann, T. A. (2022). The complex social ecology of academic development: A bioecological framework and illustration examining the collective effects of parents, teachers, and peers on student engagement. Educational Psychologist, 57(2), 87-113. [DOI:10.1080/00461520.2022.2038603]
50. Slåtten, T., Lien, G., Batt-Rawden, V. H., Evenstad, S. B. N., & Onshus, T. (2023). The relationship between students' psychological capital, social-contextual factors and study-related outcomes - an empirical study from higher education in Norway. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 15(1), 17-33. [DOI:10.1108/IJQSS-11-2021-0160]
51. Tao, Y., Meng, Y., Gao, Z., & Yang, X. (2022). Perceived teacher support, student engagement, and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology, 42(4), 401-420. [DOI:10.1080/01443410.2022.2033168]
52. Tatiana, B., Kobicheva, A., Tokareva, E., & Mokhorov, D. (2022). The relationship between students' psychological security level, academic engagement and performance variables in the digital educational environment. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9385-9399. [DOI:10.1007/s10639-022-11024-5] [PMID] []
53. Travis, J., Kaszycki, A., Geden, M., & Bunde, J. (2020). Some stress is good stress: The challenge-hindrance framework, academic self-efficacy, and academic outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(8), 1632-1643. [DOI:10.1037/edu0000478]
54. Vattøy, K.-D. (2020). Teachers' beliefs about feedback practice as related to student self-regulation, self-efficacy, and language skills in teaching English as a foreign language. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64, 100828. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191491X19301749 [DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100828]
55. Vosniadou, S., Darmawan, I., Lawson, M. J., Van Deur, P., Jeffries, D., & Wyra, M. (2021). Beliefs about the self-regulation of learning predict cognitive and metacognitive strategies and academic performance in pre-service teachers. Metacognition and Learning, 16(3), 523-554. [DOI:10.1007/s11409-020-09258-0]
56. Wang, J., Bu, L., Li, Y., Song, J., & Li, N. (2021). The mediating effect of academic engagement between psychological capital and academic burnout among nursing students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 102, 104938. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691721001957 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104938] [PMID] []
57. Wang, L. (2022). Exploring the Relationship Among Teacher Emotional Intelligence, Work Engagement, Teacher Self-Efficacy, and Student Academic Achievement: A Moderated Mediation Model [Original Research]. Frontiers in psychology, 12. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.810559] [PMID] []
58. Wang, Z.-H., Yang, H.-L., Yang, Y.-Q., Liu, D., Li, Z.-H., Zhang, X.-R., Zhang, Y.-J., Shen, D., Chen, P.-L., Song, W.-Q., Wang, X.-M., Wu, X.-B., Yang, X.-F., & Mao, C. (2020). Prevalence of anxiety and depression symptom, and the demands for psychological knowledge and interventions in college students during COVID-19 epidemic: A large cross-sectional study. Journal of affective disorders, 275, 188-193. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032720323922
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.116 [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.034] [PMID] []
59. Wentzel, K. R., Battle, A., Russell, S. L., & Looney, L. B. (2010). Social supports from teachers and peers as predictors of academic and social motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35(3), 193-202. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0361476X10000068 [DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.03.002]
60. Werang, B. R., & Leba, S. M. R. (2022). Factors Affecting Student Engagement in Online Teaching and Learning: A Qualitative Case Study. Qualitative Report, 27(2). https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4253/fbf40d2b9acfb43d07e99c9ca327406a67e3.pdf [DOI:10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5165]
61. Zhao, C.-M., & Kuh, G. D. (2004). Adding Value: Learning Communities and Student Engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45(2), 115-138. [DOI:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000015692.88534.de]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
