Volume 6, Issue 3 (Autumn 2023)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023, 6(3): 25-32 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mirmotalebi Sohi R, Haj Anzehaei S Z, Ashraf Ganjuee F. (2023). Investigating the Relationship of Technological Entrepreneurship Ecosystem and Crowdfunding According to Isenberg's Model. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(3), 25-32. doi:10.61186/ijes.6.3.25
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1251-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1251-en.html
1- PhD student in Department Of Sports Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department Of Sports Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Assistant Professor, Department Of Sports Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, Department Of Sports Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Assistant Professor, Department Of Sports Management, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (712 Views)
Purpose: The cities of the world are becoming centers of innovation, and today the technological entrepreneurship ecosystem is very important. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigating the relationship of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem and crowd funding according to Isenberg's model.
Methodology: In a descriptive-analytical study from type of correlation, 225 people from middle and senior managers and experts in the field of investment were selected as a sample based on Cochran's formula by simple random sampling method. The samples responded to the standard questionnaires of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem (Isenberg, 2011) and crowd funding (Shabanian, 2012), whose validity and reliability were confirmed. Data were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression tests in SPSS24 software.
Findings: The findings showed that all six components of the technological entrepreneurship ecosystem including policy, financing, culture, supports, human capital, and markets had a positive and significant correlation with all four components of crowd funding including the type, role, goals, and scope of crowd funding. Also, the components of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem could significantly explain 62.7% of crowd funding changes, which according to the beta value, the variables of policy, human capital, culture, markets, financing and supports had a direct and significant effect on crowd funding (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The results indicated the relation and effective role of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem in crowd funding. Therefore, for the improvement of crowd funding can be provided the ground for the promotion of the technological entrepreneurship ecosystem.
Methodology: In a descriptive-analytical study from type of correlation, 225 people from middle and senior managers and experts in the field of investment were selected as a sample based on Cochran's formula by simple random sampling method. The samples responded to the standard questionnaires of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem (Isenberg, 2011) and crowd funding (Shabanian, 2012), whose validity and reliability were confirmed. Data were analyzed with Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression tests in SPSS24 software.
Findings: The findings showed that all six components of the technological entrepreneurship ecosystem including policy, financing, culture, supports, human capital, and markets had a positive and significant correlation with all four components of crowd funding including the type, role, goals, and scope of crowd funding. Also, the components of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem could significantly explain 62.7% of crowd funding changes, which according to the beta value, the variables of policy, human capital, culture, markets, financing and supports had a direct and significant effect on crowd funding (P<0.001).
Conclusion: The results indicated the relation and effective role of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem in crowd funding. Therefore, for the improvement of crowd funding can be provided the ground for the promotion of the technological entrepreneurship ecosystem.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/01/24 | Accepted: 2023/05/31 | Published: 2023/12/1
Received: 2023/01/24 | Accepted: 2023/05/31 | Published: 2023/12/1
References
1. Ahmadizad A, Kafcheh P, Norouzi Mozaffari H, Mohammadi H. (2022). An analysis of the role of talent management trends and measures on the performance of technological businesses in Kurdistan Science and Technology Park. Industrial Technology Development Quarterly. 20(49): 21-36. [Persian]
2. Babaei Fishani MR, Khozin A, Zia B, Ashrafi M. (2023). Presenting a model of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem in the field of knowledge-based businesses active in the field of financial technology. Financial Economics. 11(44): 175-202. [Persian]
3. Berger ESC, Kuckertz A. (2016). Female entrepreneurship in startup ecosystems worldwide. Journal of Business Research. 69(11): 5163-5168. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.098]
4. Bertello A, Battisti E, De Bernardi P, Bresciani S. (2022). An integrative framework of knowledge-intensive and sustainable entrepreneurship in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Journal of Business Research. 142: 683-693. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.054]
5. Doan MA, Toledano M. (2018). Beyond organization-centred public relations: Collective action through a civic crowdfunding campaign. Public Relations Review. 44(1): 37-46. [DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.10.001]
6. Fehrer JA, Nenonen S. (2020). Crowdfunding networks: Structure, dynamics and critical capabilities. Industrial Marketing Management. 88: 449-464. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.02.012]
7. Ferreira V, Papaoikonomou E, Terceno A. (2022). Unpeel the layers of trust! A comparative analysis of crowdfunding platforms and what they do to generate trust. Business Horizons. 65(1): 7-19. [DOI:10.1016/j.bushor.2021.08.004]
8. Han J, Ruan Y, Wang Y, Zhou H. (2021). Toward a complex adaptive system: The case of the Zhongguancun entrepreneurship ecosystem. Journal of Business Research. 128: 537-550. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.077]
9. Hematian Khayyat M, Zand Hesami H, Davari A. (2022). Dimensions and components of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem in Iran's digital creative industries with emphasis on the culture taste of digital technologies. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development. 15(1): 181-200. [Persian]
10. Isenberg DJ. (2010). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review. 24: 1-12.
11. Jafari Sadeghi V, Garcia-Perez A, Candelo E, Couturier J. (2021). Exploring the impact of digital transformation on technology entrepreneurship and technological market expansion: The role of technology readiness, exploration and exploitation. Journal of Business Research. 124: 100-111. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.020]
12. Kordheydari R, Mansouri Moayyed F, Khodadad Hoseini H. (2019). Metasynthesis of factors affecting to develop startups in new technology-based firms in entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development. 12(1): 141-160. [Persian]
13. Leonski W. (2022). Crowdfunding as an innovative source of financing business initiatives in Poland. Procedia Computer Science. 207: 2921-2929. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2022.09.350]
14. Martin-Rojas R, Garcia-Morales VJ, Gonzalez-Alvarez N. (2019). Technological antecedents of entrepreneurship and its consequences for organizational performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 147: 22-35. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.018]
15. Meng D, Li X, Rong K. (2019). Industry-to-university knowledge transfer in ecosystem-based academic entrepreneurship: Case study of automotive dynamics & control group in Tsinghua University. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 141: 249-262. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.005]
16. Meysami AM, Mohammadi Elyasi Gh, Mobini Dehkordi A, Hejazi SR. (2017). The dimensions and components of technological entrepreneurship ecosystem in Iran. Journal of Technology Development Management. 5(4): 9-42. [Persian]
17. Presenza A, Abbate T, Cesaroni F, Appio FP. (2019). Enacting social crowdfunding business ecosystems: The case of the platform Meridonare. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 143: 190-201. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.001]
18. Saeedi Aghdam M, Alemtabriz A, Sarafizadeh Qazvini A, Zandhessami H. (2019). Simulation of crowdfunding in the ecosystem of entrepreneurship. Journal of Strategic Management Studies. 10(37): 141-160. [Persian]
19. Surie G. (2017). Creating the innovation ecosystem for renewable energy via social entrepreneurship: Insights from India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 121: 184-195. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.03.006]
20. Xie K, Song Y, Zhang W, Hao J, Liu Z, Chen Y. (2018). Creating the innovation ecosystem for renewable energy via social entrepreneurship: Insights from India. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 135: 156-168. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.01.021]
21. Yasar B, Yilmaz IS, Hatipoglu N, Salih A. (2022). Stretching the success in reward-based crowdfunding. Journal of Business Research. 152: 205-220. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.07.053]
22. Zaeim A, Mosakhani M, Davari A. (2022). Identifying and analyzing the dimensions of Iran's technological university entrepreneurship ecosystem from the perspective of experts in university incubators. Iranian Journal of Public Policy in Management. 13(46): 1-12. [Persian]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
