Volume 5, Issue 1 (Spring 2022)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2022, 5(1): 160-171 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hejazi S M, Zanjanizadeh Azazi H, Estalaji A. (2022). Investigating the Inefficiency Causes of Educational Institution in the Field of Knowledge Transfer. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 5(1), 160-171. doi:10.61186/ijes.5.1.160
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1149-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1149-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Sociology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Professor, Department of Human Geography, Imam Khomeini Shahre Rei Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Professor, Department of Human Geography, Imam Khomeini Shahre Rei Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (1747 Views)
Purpose: Considering the role and importance of knowledge and its transfer in education, the purpose of this research was to investigating the inefficiency causes of education in the field of knowledge transfer.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was from type of applied and in terms of implementation method was from type of qualitative. The research population was education specialists, principals, teachers, parents and high school students of Iran in the 2019-20 academic years. The sample size was considered 20 people which from each of the five group number of 4 people were selected as a sample by available sampling method. The research tool was a semi-structured interview whose validity was confirmed by the triangulation method and its reliability was obtained by the agreement coefficient method between the two coders 0.87. Data were analyzed by open, axial and selective coding method in MAXQDA software.
Findings: The results showed that the inefficiency causes of educational institution in the field of knowledge transfer had 184 open codes or indicator, 16 axial codes or component and 7 selected codes or categorical. The category of objective had two components of human education and training, the category of teacher had four components of material and spiritual rights, selection, moral commitment and professional commitment, the category of student had two components of motivation and learning, the category of curriculum had two components of content and curriculum and settings, categories of educational methods had two components of teaching methods and teaching aids equipment, the category of educational environment had two components of educational space and secondary education space and the student's psychological category had two components of family and social status. Finally, based on them a pattern of inefficiency causes of education in the field of knowledge transfer was designed.
Conclusion: According to the identified indicators, components and categories for the inefficiency causes of education in the field of knowledge transfer, planning is necessary to reduce the inefficiency of the mentioned institution in the field of knowledge transfer.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was from type of applied and in terms of implementation method was from type of qualitative. The research population was education specialists, principals, teachers, parents and high school students of Iran in the 2019-20 academic years. The sample size was considered 20 people which from each of the five group number of 4 people were selected as a sample by available sampling method. The research tool was a semi-structured interview whose validity was confirmed by the triangulation method and its reliability was obtained by the agreement coefficient method between the two coders 0.87. Data were analyzed by open, axial and selective coding method in MAXQDA software.
Findings: The results showed that the inefficiency causes of educational institution in the field of knowledge transfer had 184 open codes or indicator, 16 axial codes or component and 7 selected codes or categorical. The category of objective had two components of human education and training, the category of teacher had four components of material and spiritual rights, selection, moral commitment and professional commitment, the category of student had two components of motivation and learning, the category of curriculum had two components of content and curriculum and settings, categories of educational methods had two components of teaching methods and teaching aids equipment, the category of educational environment had two components of educational space and secondary education space and the student's psychological category had two components of family and social status. Finally, based on them a pattern of inefficiency causes of education in the field of knowledge transfer was designed.
Conclusion: According to the identified indicators, components and categories for the inefficiency causes of education in the field of knowledge transfer, planning is necessary to reduce the inefficiency of the mentioned institution in the field of knowledge transfer.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2022/01/31 | Accepted: 2022/03/17 | Published: 2022/04/3
Received: 2022/01/31 | Accepted: 2022/03/17 | Published: 2022/04/3
References
1. Akbari A, Nooshinfard F, Hariri N. (2018). Identifying and prioritizing the barriers to knowledge flow in university libraries based on the maturity model of knowledge management belonged to the American Productivity and Quality Center. Library and Information Science Research. 8(2): 129-146. [Persian]
2. Askari Deefe J, Salehi M, Yousefi Saeedabadi R. (2020). Investigating the components of servant leadership in Tehran Education. Jundishapur Education Development Journal. 11: 200-212. [Persian]
3. Azizi N, Mohammadi Sh. (2012). The obstacles of strategic management implementation in the Kurdistan's organization of education: A reflection on the managers' and senior experts' views. Journal of Educational Sciences. 18(2): 51-74. [Persian]
4. Babashahi J, Mohammadnezhad Federdi M. (2017). Investigating the causes of inefficiency of organizational training in the public sector: Research based on integrated strategy. Education in the Humanities. 1(2): 127-144. [Persian]
5. Chen Y, Li C, Gong L, et al. (2020). A deep neural network compression algorithm based on knowledge transfer for edge devices. Computer Communications. 163: 186-194. [DOI:10.1016/j.comcom.2020.09.016]
6. Concu GB, Atzeni G, Meleddu M, Vannini M. (2020). Policy design for climate change mitigation and adaptation in sheep farming: Insights from a study of the knowledge transfer chain. Environmental Science & Policy. 107: 99-113. [DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.014]
7. Guclu Yilmaz F. (2021). Innovative practices in Turkish education system according to teacher perceptions. Anatolian Journal of Education. 6(1): 175-190. [DOI:10.29333/aje.2021.6115a]
8. Hasanpour E, Imani MN, Oladian M. (2020). Presenting a leadership model of performance in the Ministry of Education. Jundishapur Education Development Journal. 11: 184-199. [Persian]
9. Imanzadeh A, Ebadi Z. (2020). Lived experiences of Arabic language teachers on the inefficiencies of teaching Arabic language: A phenomenological study. Curriculum Researches. 9(2): 1-26. [Persian]
10. Jiswal A, Arun CJ. (2021). Potential of artificial intelligence for transformation of the education system in India. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology. 17(1): 142-158.
11. Kalantari R, Gholami J. (2011). Investigating the causes of education inefficiency in English language teaching and comparing public schools and private schools. Language and Translation Studies. 44(3): 51-81. [Persian]
12. Karabulut N. (2018). The Greek education system and implications for the Turkish education system. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 6(3): 78-90. [DOI:10.11114/jets.v6i3.3036]
13. Khesali A, Salehi K, Bahrami M. (2016). Analyzing the teachers' perceptions and lived experiences about the causes of inefficiency of descriptive evaluation scheme in primary schools: A phenomenological study. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Studies. 5(12): 121-152. [Persian]
14. Patil SK, Kant R. (2014). Ranking the barriers to knowledge management adoption in the supply chain using the fuzzy AHP method. International Journal of Business Innovation and Research. 8(1): 52-75. [DOI:10.1504/IJBIR.2014.058047]
15. Plangger K, Montecchi M, Danatzis I, et al. (2020). Strategic enablement investments: Exploring differences in human and technological knowledge transfers to supply chain partners. Industrial Marketing Management. 91: 187-195. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.09.001] [PMCID]
16. Rosby LV, Schmidt HG, Tan GJS, et al. (2021). Promotion of knowledge transfer and retention in year 2 medical students using an online training exercise. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 26(3): 1059-1074. [DOI:10.1007/s10459-021-10037-y] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Sekerci R, Yoruk T, Karatas S. (2020). Evaluation of the Turkish education system in the context of learning organisations according to the opinion of the candidate teachers. African Educational Research Journal. 8(2): 360-365. [DOI:10.30918/AERJ.8S2.20.066]
18. Shamsaee M, Nazari F. (2019). Examine thebarriers to knowledge transfer of officials sectors to new personnel and in design in the departments of Persian Gulf Martyrs hospital environmentin Bushehr base on Szulanski model. Journal of Studies in Library and Information Science. 11(3): 113-128. [Persian]
19. Sharif S, Ghafoori A, Salehi K. (2020). Analysis of job issues of education teachers. Quarterly Journal of Teacher Education. 3(2): 39-68. [Persian]
20. Wang X, Wang J, Zhang R. (2019). The optimal feasible knowledge transfer path in a knowledge creation driven team. Data & Knowledge Engineering. 119: 105-122. [DOI:10.1016/j.datak.2019.01.002]
21. Wang Y, Huang Q, Davison RM, Yang F. (2018). Effect of transactive memory systems on team performance mediated by knowledge transfer. International Journal of Information Management, 41: 65-79. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.04.001]
22. Yang X, Cheng PY, Huang YM. (2021). Understanding teacher learning through teacher-created knowledge products and transactions. SAGE Open. 11(3): 1-10. [DOI:10.1177/21582440211032659]
23. Zahabion L, Saedian N, Keshtiarai N. (2021). Validating the talent management model of elementary school teachers in the formal and public education system of Iran based on the fundamental reform document of education in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Applied Issues in Islamic Education. 6(1): 73-98. [Persian] [DOI:10.52547/qaiie.6.1.73]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
