Volume 5, Issue 2 (Summer 2022)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2022, 5(2): 166-181 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Azadi B, Hamidi K, Eslambolchi A, Niknafs J, Bayat B. (2022). Identifying and Prioritizing the Challenges of Implementing Participatory Governance in the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of the Country. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 5(2), 166-181. doi:10.61186/ijes.5.2.166
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1155-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1155-en.html
1- PhD student, Department of Public Administration, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Science, Information and Epistemology, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
4- Assistant Professor, Department of Science, Information and Epistemology, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamedan, Iran.
Abstract: (1583 Views)
Purpose: The main purpose of this research was to identify the challenges of implementing participatory governance in the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of the country.
Methodology: This study was a mixed research. The statistical population in the qualitative section included the faculty members and experts in the field of public administration, professors familiar with the subject of the research and managers with experience in the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of the country, who were selected as 12 subjects using the snowball method. The statistical population in the quantitative section also included managers, deputies and experts of the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Sciences of the country. The research tool in the qualitative part was a semi-structured interview, and in the quantitative part, it was a researcher made questionnaire. Theme analysis was used to analyze the information in the qualitative part and the AHP method was used to prioritize the factors.
Findings: The results indicated that; infrastructures, bureaucratic factors, environmental obstacles, weakness in policy making, public accountability, communication, joint commitment, trust building, obstacles related to executives and common destiny are the main challenges in the implementation of participatory governance in the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of the country.
Conclusion: A total of 10 main themes and 59 sub-themes were identified.
Methodology: This study was a mixed research. The statistical population in the qualitative section included the faculty members and experts in the field of public administration, professors familiar with the subject of the research and managers with experience in the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of the country, who were selected as 12 subjects using the snowball method. The statistical population in the quantitative section also included managers, deputies and experts of the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Sciences of the country. The research tool in the qualitative part was a semi-structured interview, and in the quantitative part, it was a researcher made questionnaire. Theme analysis was used to analyze the information in the qualitative part and the AHP method was used to prioritize the factors.
Findings: The results indicated that; infrastructures, bureaucratic factors, environmental obstacles, weakness in policy making, public accountability, communication, joint commitment, trust building, obstacles related to executives and common destiny are the main challenges in the implementation of participatory governance in the Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education of the country.
Conclusion: A total of 10 main themes and 59 sub-themes were identified.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2022/02/9 | Accepted: 2022/06/13 | Published: 2022/09/22
Received: 2022/02/9 | Accepted: 2022/06/13 | Published: 2022/09/22
References
1. Accurate, fair; Yaqoubi, Noor Mohammad; Kamalian, Amin Reza; Dehghani, Masoud (2018). Presenting a model of the staged development of network governance using a meta-combination approach, Public Administration Quarterly, 11(2): 203-230.
2. Aghazadeh, Mohammadreza; Askari, Tayyaba; Shahi, Adele; Farahmand, Amina (2014). Designing a process model for formulating the strategy of governance organizations based on the network governance paradigm, Quarterly Journal of Government Organizations Management, 4(1): 52-29.
3. Biginia, Abdolreza; Safari, Saeed; Morshidzad, Ali; Poladrag, Abdul Majid (2012). Identifying and prioritizing indicators of good governance, Public Administration Perspectives Quarterly, 12: 86-65.
4. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C. & Stone, M. M. (2006). "The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaboration: Propositions from the Literature Abstract". Public Adminstration Review. No 66 (December). pp. 44-55. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x]
5. C. Fritz Foley, Paul Goldsmith-Pinkham, Jonathan Greenstein, Eric Zwick (2018) Opting out of good governance. Journal of Empirical Finance, Volume 46, March, Pages 93-110 [DOI:10.1016/j.jempfin.2017.12.004]
6. Chen, U., & Lee, J. (2017). Collaborative data networks for public service: governance, management, and performance. Journal of Public Management Review, 20(5), 1-19. [DOI:10.1080/14719037.2017.1305691]
7. David Bartolini, Raffaella Santolini (2017). Political institutions behind good governance Economic Systems, Volume 41, Issue 1, March 2017, Pages 68-85. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecosys.2016.05.004]
8. Emerson, K.; Nabatchi, T.; Balogh, S. (2011). "An integrative framework for collaborative governance". Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. No 22(1). pp. 1-29. [DOI:10.1093/jopart/mur011]
9. Emerson, K; Gerlak, A. K. (2014). "Adaptation in Collaborative Governance Regimes". Environmental Management. No 54(4). pp. 768-781. [DOI:10.1007/s00267-014-0334-7] [PMID]
10. Florian Weiler, Carola Klöck, Matthew Dornan (2018). Vulnerability, good governance, or donor interests? The allocation of aid for climate change adaptation. World Development, Volume 104, Pages 65-77. [DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.001]
11. Florian Weiler, Carola Klöck, Matthew DornanVulnerability, good governance, or donor interests? The allocation of aid for climate change adaptation. World Development, Volume 104, Pages 65-77 [DOI:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.11.001]
12. Geske Dijkstra (2018). Aid and good governance: Examining aggregate unintended effects of aid. Evaluation and Program Planning, Volume 68, June, Pages 225-232 [DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.004] [PMID]
13. Geske Dijkstra (2018). Aid and good governance: Examining aggregate unintended effects of aid. Evaluation and Program Planning, Volume 68, Pages 225-232 [DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.09.004] [PMID]
14. Glen Smith (2018) Good governance and the role of the public in Scotland's marine spatial planning systemMarine Policy, Volume 94, August, Pages 1-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.marpol.2018.04.017]
15. Hayes, A., & Scott, T. (2017). Multiplex Network Analysis for Complex Governance Systems Using Surveys and Online Behavior. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 1-27. [DOI:10.1111/psj.12210]
16. Herry Purnomo, Beni Okarda, Ade Ayu Dewayani, Made Ali, Kartika S. Reducing forest and land fires through good palm oil value chain governance Open access, Forest Policy and Economics, Volume 91, Pages 94-106. [DOI:10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.014]
17. Jacob, D. (2016). How and why Participatory governance evolves. Journal of Electronic Markets, 26(1), 43-54. [DOI:10.1007/s12525-015-0203-0]
18. John F. Helliwell, Haifang Huang, Shawn Grover, Shun Wang (2018) Empirical linkages between good governance and national well-being. Journal of Comparative Economics, in press, corrected proof, Available online 31 January. [DOI:10.1016/j.jce.2018.01.004]
19. Kaufmann, D. K. (2010). The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Methodology and Analytical Issues. World Bank.
20. Lisa Sharma-Wallace (2018) Adaptive governance good practice: Show me the evidence! Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 222, Pages 174-184 [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.067] [PMID]
21. Lisa Sharma-Wallace, Sandra J. Velarde, Anita Wreford (2018). Adaptive governance good practice: Show me the evidence. Journal of Environmental Management, Volume 222, 15 September, Pages 174-184. [DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.067] [PMID]
22. Maurice Clarke, Afra Egan (2017). Maurice Clarke, Afra Egan. Maurice Clarke, Afra Egan.
23. Mokhbar, Ali; Mehrara, Vahid (2012). Governance and fight against corruption, Hamkarani Khoob Research Project, Tehran, Publications of the Research Office of the Islamic Council.
24. Momna Yousaf, Freeha Ihsan, Abida Ellahi (2016). Exploring the impact of good governance on citizens' trust in Pakistan. Government Information Quarterly, Volume 33, Issue 1, January, Pages 200-209. [DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2015.06.001]
25. Naderi, Mohammad Mahdi (2013). Good ruling; Brief Introduction and Review, Islamic and Management Research Quarterly, 1(1):63-95.
26. Nikobasti, Ali (2013). Governance and Development: Past, Present and Future, Program and Budget Quarterly, 16(4): 154-129.
27. Omranian Khorasani, Hamid; persistent, morbid; Kolahi, Mehdi (2017). Adaptive-Participatory Governance in Natural Resources, 7th National Conference on Rangeland and Pasture Management in Iran, Alborz Applied Scientific Education Center, Alborz, Iran.
28. Petr Klusáček, Filip Alexandrescu, Robert Osman, Jiří Malý, Jakub Trojan(2018) Good governance as a strategic choice in brownfield regeneration: Regional dynamics from the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, Volume 73, April, Pages 29-39. [DOI:10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.007]
29. Robert Bruce Hey (2017). What Are the Principles of Good Governance? Performance Management for the Oil, Gas, and Process Industries, Pages 91-105 [DOI:10.1016/B978-0-12-810446-0.00007-4]
30. Roper Nedd, R., K. (2018). Good Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Rhetoric to Reality, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Howard University.
31. Salimi, Jalil; Maknoon, Reza (2017). Qualitative meta-analysis of scientific research on the issue of governance in Iran, State Management Quarterly, 10(1): 1-30
32. Weller, T., & Tierney, J. (2017). Evidence in the Participatory Governance of Regional Decarbonisation: A Critical Appraisal. Journal of Public Administration, 77(2), 1-14. [DOI:10.1111/1467-8500.12244]
33. Yi, H. (2017). Participatory Structure and Governance Performance: What Makes a Difference? Journal of Public Administration Review, 78(2), 1-11. [DOI:10.1111/puar.12886]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
