Volume 6, Issue 1 (Spring 2023)                   Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023, 6(1): 12-30 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khosravi R A, Mehrmohammadi M. Design and Validation of Decentering Schemes for Decision-Making about Curriculum Based on Schwab’s Theory and Features of the Curriculum Development System in Iran. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023; 6 (1) :12-30
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1167-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
2- Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (689 Views)
Purpose: the present study aimed to design and validate decentering schemes for decision making about curriculum based on Schwab’s practical theory and features of the educational system in Iran.
Methodology: in the first step, qualitative methods of "Speculative Essay", "Evaluative Inquiry: Situational Assessment", and "Integrative Inquiry: The Research Synthesis" were employed to explain decentering curriculum according to Schwab's theory, to evaluate and analyze the characteristics of the curriculum system in Iran with regard to the decision-making structure, and to codify the first options of decentering the curriculum, respectively. To evaluate the quality of the primary scheme and codify the final one, the qualitative research approach and interviews were employed.
Findings: the findings of this study show that decentering decision making about the elements of curriculum in Iran’s curriculum development system includes seven schema as follows: (a) uniform (one type); (b) multiform (four types); (c) formless (ten types); (d) a combination of uniform and multiform (four types); (e) a combination of uniform and formless (ten types); (f) a combination of multiform and formless (forty types), and (g) a combination of uniform, multiform, and formless (forty types).
Conclusion: in the designed scheme, several decision-making positions for curriculum are introduced according to various area features of the country to enable all areas to make optimal choices with regard to their capacity.
Full-Text [PDF 707 kb]   (220 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research Article | Subject: Special
Received: 2022/03/4 | Accepted: 2023/01/31 | Published: 2023/05/31

References
1. Adib Manesh, M; Ali Asgari, M; And Mousa Poor, N. (2012).Feasibility of Applying School-Based Curriculum Development in Kermanshah High Schools. Curriculum Researches Journal, N. 2, pp. 81-104.
2. Amin Khandaghi, M; Goodarzi, M .A(2012).Designing Regional Curriculum Development System for Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Curriculum Studies, N. 23, pp. 76-109.
3. Arefi, M. (2007). Analysis of Decentralization Approach in Education System of Iran Based on Human Resources. Journal of Educational Psychology, N. 6, pp. 85-102.
4. Asadi, M (2012). Tendency of Teachers to Participate in Decision Making Related to Curriculum and Distinctive Features Affecting it. MA Thesis of Curriculum Development, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.(2006).Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
6. Cawelti, G. (1974). Urban School Decentralization and Curriculum Development Strategies, In, I.Ezra Stapler, (Ed.), Impact of Decentralization on Curriculums.Washington, D. C.:Associal-Mn for Supervision and Curriculum Development. pp 18-27.
7. Creswell J. W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Education.
8. Curriculum Development Center (2015). A Brief Report on the Works Written by the Provinces. Tehran: Educational Planning and Research Organization.
9. Fathi Vajargah, K (2004). Feasibility of Teacher's Participation in Curriculum Development Process in Education System of Iran. Journal of Educational Innovations, N. 8, pp.5 9-79
10. Fathi Vajargah, K; Gooya, Z; AghaZadeh, M; Abolghasemi, M; Kamkari, K (2002). Designing and Validation of Needs Assessment Scheme of School Based Curriculum (SBCNA). Journal of Educational Innovations, N. 2, pp. 9-34.
11. Gunnarsson, V., Orazem P., Sanchez M., Verdisco A., (2004), Does School Decentralization Raise Student Outcomes? Theory and Evidence on the Roles of School Autonomy and Community Participation. Working Paper 04005, Iowa Stata University Depart of Economics.
12. Hill, P.T. & Bonan, J. (1991). Decentralization and Accountability in Public Education. Santa Monica: RAND. (ED 334665).
13. Izadi, S (2000). Designing Semi-Centralized Scheme for Curriculum Development System of Iran and the Role of Teachers in Curriculum Development Process. PhD Dissertation of Education, Tarbiat Modares University
14. King, J. A. (1991). Evaluative Inquiry: Situational Assessment, In E.C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry, translated by Mehrmohammadi M. et al. (2009), SAMT Publications.
15. Marsh, K. J. (1991). Integrative Inquiry: The Research Synthesis, In E.C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry, translated by Mehrmohammadi M. et al. (2009), SAMT Publications
16. Mehrmohammadi, M (2002). Curriculum: Views, Approaches and Perspectives. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Publications
17. Mehrmohammadi, M (2007). Synchronic Management of Decentralization Stages in the Curriculum Development System. Journal of Curriculum Studies, N. 4, pp. 1-16.
18. Mehrmohammadi, M et al. (2010). Theoretical Scheme of Curriculum and Education Subsystem. Theoretical Studies of National Curriculum Document of Education Organization, Doctrine of Education of Islamic Republic of Iran
19. Morgan, D. L. (1998). The Focus Group Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [DOI:10.4135/9781483328164]
20. Nasr Isfahani, A.R., And Golkar Saberi, R (2008). Delegating the Authority of Educational Planning and Curriculum to Teachers Council of the Schools in School Based Management. Journal of Efficient Schools, N. 4, pp. 93-99.
21. Reid, W. (1999). Curriculum as Institution and Practice: Essays in the Deliberative Tradition. Lawrence Elbaum Associate, New Jersey.
22. Schubert, W. H. (1991). Philosophical Research: Theoretical Inquiry, , In E.C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry, translated by Mehrmohammadi M. et al. (2009), SAMT Publications.
23. Schubert, W. H. (1993). Curriculum Reform. In G. Cawelti (Ed.), Challenges and Achievements of American Education: The 1993 ASCD yearbook (pp. 80-115). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
24. Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A Language for Curriculum. School Review, 78, 1-23. [DOI:10.1086/442881]
25. Schwab, J. J. (1970). The Practical: A Language for Curriculum (Washington, DC: National.
26. Schwab, J. J. (1983). The Practical: Something for Curriculum Professors to Do. Curriculum Inquiry, 13(3), 239-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1983.11075885 [DOI:10.2307/1179606]
27. Secretariat of the Curriculum Making (2012).National Curriculum of Islamic Republic of Iran. Fifth Edition; Tehran: Educational Planning and Research Organization
28. Seidman, I. (2012).Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York and London: Teachers College.
29. Short, E. C. (Ed.). (1991). Forms of curriculum inquiry. translated by Mehrmohammadi M. et al. (2009), SAMT Publications.
30. Sturman, A. (1989). Decentralisation and the Curriculum: Effects of the Decentralisation of Curriculum Decision Making in Australia. ACER Research Monograph No. 35. Melbourne: ACER.
31. Utomo, E. (2005). Challenges of Curriculum Reform in the Context of Decentralization: The Response of Teachers to a Competence-Based Curriculum (CBC) and Its Implementation in Schools. This Dissertation was presented. University of Pittsburgh Faculty of Education.
32. Ziba, Simon A., (2011). The Decentralization and Centralization of Curriculum in the Primary Education of Burkina Faso. Master's Theses. Loyola University Chicago. Pub No:1492717.

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian journal of educational sociology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb