Volume 5, Issue 2 (Summer 2022)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2022, 5(2): 64-75 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ariaparsa M. (2022). Investigating the Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation on Company Performance with Considering the Role of Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation and Its Consequences. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 5(2), 64-75. doi:10.61186/ijes.5.2.64
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1200-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1200-en.html
PhD in Entrepreneurship, Department of Management, Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan Branch, Isfahan Iran (Corresponding Author).
Abstract: (1528 Views)
Purpose: Entrepreneurial orientation as a new phenomenon in the economy is in a wide range and in interaction with entrepreneurship. Therefore, the purpose of this research was investigating the impact of entrepreneurial orientation on company performance with considering the role of sustainable entrepreneurial orientation and its consequences.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was cross-sectional from type of quantitative. The research population was the entrepreneurial managers of companies located in the scientific-research of Isfahan city in 2020 year with number 208 people, which all of them selected by census sampling method, but the questionnaire for 187 people was received. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire with 38 items and seven components of innovation, pioneering, risk-taking, sustainable entrepreneurial orientation, creation and expansion of new markets, organization and effective use of resources and company performance, which whose validity was confirmed by the opinion of experts and their reliability was evaluated as suitable by Cronbach's alpha method. Data were analyzed with exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling methods in SPSS and Smart PLS software.
Findings: The findings showed that the factor load and average variance extracted of all components of innovation, pioneering, risk-taking, sustainable entrepreneurial orientation, creation and expansion of new markets, organization and effective use of resources and company performance was higher than 0.50 and the reliability of all of them with Cronbach's alpha and combination methods was higher than 0.70. In addition, the model of entrepreneurial orientation on company performance with considering the role of sustainable entrepreneurial orientation and its consequences had a good fit. Also, the sustainable entrepreneurial orientation had a direct and significant effect on innovation, pioneering, risk-taking, creation and expansion of new markets, organization and effective use of resources and company performance and company performance had a direct and significant effect on creation and expansion of new markets and organization and effective use of resources (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The findings of this research indicated that entrepreneurial orientation was effective on the company performance with considering the role of sustainable entrepreneurial orientation and its consequences.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was cross-sectional from type of quantitative. The research population was the entrepreneurial managers of companies located in the scientific-research of Isfahan city in 2020 year with number 208 people, which all of them selected by census sampling method, but the questionnaire for 187 people was received. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire with 38 items and seven components of innovation, pioneering, risk-taking, sustainable entrepreneurial orientation, creation and expansion of new markets, organization and effective use of resources and company performance, which whose validity was confirmed by the opinion of experts and their reliability was evaluated as suitable by Cronbach's alpha method. Data were analyzed with exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling methods in SPSS and Smart PLS software.
Findings: The findings showed that the factor load and average variance extracted of all components of innovation, pioneering, risk-taking, sustainable entrepreneurial orientation, creation and expansion of new markets, organization and effective use of resources and company performance was higher than 0.50 and the reliability of all of them with Cronbach's alpha and combination methods was higher than 0.70. In addition, the model of entrepreneurial orientation on company performance with considering the role of sustainable entrepreneurial orientation and its consequences had a good fit. Also, the sustainable entrepreneurial orientation had a direct and significant effect on innovation, pioneering, risk-taking, creation and expansion of new markets, organization and effective use of resources and company performance and company performance had a direct and significant effect on creation and expansion of new markets and organization and effective use of resources (P<0.05).
Conclusion: The findings of this research indicated that entrepreneurial orientation was effective on the company performance with considering the role of sustainable entrepreneurial orientation and its consequences.
Keywords: Entrepreneurial Orientation, Company Performance, Sustainable Entrepreneurial Orientation, Innovation, Pioneering, Risk-Taking
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2022/06/27 | Accepted: 2022/09/22 | Published: 2022/09/22
Received: 2022/06/27 | Accepted: 2022/09/22 | Published: 2022/09/22
References
1. Awang AB, Ahmad ZA, Subari KA. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation among bumiputera small and medium agro-based enterprises (BSMAEs) in West Malaysia: Policy implication in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management. 5(5): 130-143. [DOI:10.5539/ijbm.v5n5p130]
2. Brettel M, Rottenberger JD. (2013). Examining the link between entrepreneurial orientation and learning processes in small and medium-size enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management. 51(4): 471-490. [DOI:10.1111/jsbm.12002]
3. Cesinger B, Vallaster C, Muller JM. (2022). The ebb and flow of identity: How sustainable entrepreneurs deal with their hybridity. European Management Journal. 40(1): 77-89. [DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2021.04.003]
4. Criado-Gomis A, Iniesta-Bonillo MA, Cervera-Taulet A. (2018). Sustainable entrepreneurial orientation within an intrapreneurial context: Effects on business performance. International Entrepreneurial and Management Journal. 2(5): 295-308. [DOI:10.1007/s11365-018-0503-x]
5. Cuevas-Vargas H, Parga-Montoya N. (2022). How ICT usage affect frugal innovation in Mexican small firms. The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. Procedia Computer Science. 199: 223-230. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.028]
6. Cunha C, Kastenholz E, Carneiro MJ. (2020). Entrepreneurs in rural tourism: Do lifestyle motivations contribute to management practices that enhance sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems? Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 44: 215-226. [DOI:10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.06.007]
7. Dong B, Xu H, Luo J, Nicol CD, Liu W. (2020). Many roads lead to Rome: How entrepreneurial orientation and trust boost the positive network range and entrepreneurial performance relationship. Industrial Marketing Management. 88: 173-185. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.04.016]
8. Ferreras-Mendez JL, Liopis O, Alegre J. (2022). Speeding up new product development through entrepreneurial orientation in SMEs: The moderating role of ambidexterity. Industrial Marketing Management. 102: 240-251. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2022.01.015]
9. Genc E, Dayan M, Genc OF. (2019). The impact of SME internationalization on innovation: The mediating role of market and entrepreneurial orientation. Industrial Marketing Management. 82: 253-264. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.01.008]
10. Hernandez-Linares R, Kellermanns FW, Lopez-Fernandez MC. (2018). A note on the relationships between learning, market, and entrepreneurial orientations in family and nonfamily firms. Journal of Family Business Strategy. 9(3): 192-204. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfbs.2018.08.001]
11. Hughes M, Morgan RE. (2008). Deconstructing the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and business performance at the embryonic stage of firm growth. Industrial Marketing Management. 36 (5): 651-661. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2006.04.003]
12. Khodadadi MR, Motefakeri H, Soleimani B. (2020). The effect of individual entrepreneurial orientation (IEO) and entrepreneurial intention and self- fulfillment with the mediating role of entrepreneurial skills. Applied Research of Sport Management. 8(3): 37-47. [Persian]
13. Khosrowjerdi M, Sharifzadeh M. (2022). Analyzing the effect of entrepreneurial orientation components on agricultural entrepreneurship intention in rural areas of Marvdasht. Journal of Entrepreneurial Strategies in Agriculture. 8(16): 86-96. [Persian] [DOI:10.52547/jea.8.16.86]
14. Kohtamaki M, Heimonen J, Parida V. (2019). The nonlinear relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and sales growth: The moderating effects of slack resources and absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Research. 100: 100-110. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.03.018]
15. Kollmann T, Stockmann C, Niemand T, Hensellek S, De Cruppe K. (2021). A configurational approach to entrepreneurial orientation and cooperation explaining product/service innovation in digital vs. non-digital startups. Journal of Business Research. 125: 508-519. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.041]
16. Long TB, Blok V, Cononx I. (2019). The diffusion of climate-smart agricultural innovations: Systems level factors that inhibit sustainable entrepreneurial action. Journal of Cleaner Production. 232: 993-1004. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.212]
17. Mandalizadeh Z, Ehsani M, Kozehchian H, Honari H. (2014). Identifying indicators of sustainability entrepreneurship in sport. New Trend in Sport Management. 2(4): 21-35. [Persian]
18. Monferrer D, Moliner MA, Irun B, Estrada M. (2021). Network market and entrepreneurial orientations as facilitators of international performance in born globals. The mediating role of ambidextrous dynamic capabilities. Journal of Business Research. 137: 430-443. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.08.058]
19. Moridsadat P, Roknoddin Eftekhari AR, Pour Taheri M, Shabanali Fami H. (2017). Analysis of the status of sustainable entrepreneurship in macro and sectorial agricultural policies of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Rural Research. 8(1): 82-99. [Persian] [DOI:10.21859/jjr-08016]
20. Paikhaste P, Alambeigi A, Bathaiy SS. (2017). Investigate the competencies required for sustainable entrepreneurship development in agricultural higher education. Journal of Agricultural Education Administration Research. 40: 32-43. [Persian]
21. Pirayesh R, Amiri V, Jafari M, Imani Barandagh M. (2020). The effect of organizational entrepreneurship and entrepreneurship orientation on organizational performance with regard to strategic entrepreneurship in industrial companies in Zanjan province. The Journal of Productivity Management. 14(52): 23-45. [Persian]
22. Santos G, Marques CS, Ferreira JJM. (2020). Passion and perseverance as two new dimensions of an individual entrepreneurial orientation scale. Journal of Business Research. 112: 190-199. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.016]
23. Sepah Panah M, Movahedi R. (2016). Sustainable entrepreneurship a new approach in agriculture. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Agriculture. 2(1): 19-36.
24. Soleymani A, Yaghoubi Farani A, Karimi S. (2021). Designing a model for sustainable entrepreneurship development for rural businesses Hamedan province. Journal of Space Economy & Rural Development. 10(36): 49-78. [Persian]
25. Su Z, Xie E, Li Y. (2011), Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in new ventures and established firms. Journal of Small Business Management. 49(4): 558-577. [DOI:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2011.00336.x]
26. Talari M, Fallah MR, Hoseinkhani M. (2021). Investigating the role of entrepreneurial orientation in the success of new products development of knowledge-based companies with an emphasis on ambidextrous marketing. New Marketing Research Journal. 11(1): 157-178. [Persian]
27. Wales WJ, Kraus S, Filser M, Stockmann C, Covin JG. (2021). The status quo of research on entrepreneurial orientation: Conversational landmarks and theoretical scaffolding. Journal of Business Research. 128: 564-577. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.10.046]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
