Volume 6, Issue 2 (Summer 2023)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023, 6(2): 203-211 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Omrani M, Karimi A, ZandHessami H, Seyed Naghavi M A. (2023). Drawing a Scientific Map of the Field of Ambidextrous Leadership with a Bibliometric Approach. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(2), 203-211. doi:10.61186/ijes.6.2.203
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1283-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1283-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Entrepreneurship, Qazvin Branch, Islamic Azad University, Qazvin, Iran.
2- Faculty Member, Department of Management and Accounting, Farabi College, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author)
3- Faculty Member, Department of Industrial Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Faculty Member, Department of Public Management, Faculty of Management, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Faculty Member, Department of Management and Accounting, Farabi College, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author)
3- Faculty Member, Department of Industrial Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
4- Faculty Member, Department of Public Management, Faculty of Management, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (445 Views)
Purpose: Ambivalence includes the ability to perform exploitative activities (attention to the present time) and exploratory activities (attention to the future time) at the same time. Therefore, the current research was conducted with the aim of drawing a scientific map of the field of ambidextrous leadership with a bibliometric approach.
Methodology: This research in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of execution method was descriptive. The population of this study was conducted researches in the field of ambidextrous leadership in the Scopus database from 2007 to 2023 with a systematic method. For data analysis was used from bibliometric method with the two objectives of functional analysis and citation network analysis and with PRISMA protocol in VOSVIEWR software.
Findings: The results of functional analysis showed that in the field of ambidextrous leadership, Rosing et al had the most citations (583 items) with an article entitled Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. Also, the countries of China, Australia, Germany, England and America respectively had the most research in the field of ambidextrous leadership. In addition, the findings of the citation network analysis showed that there were three clusters for authors and six clusters for countries in the co-citation pattern. Also, the synonymy pattern had 1309 links, 337 keywords and 48 clusters, which most of them were with the keywords of innovation, creativity and leadership.
Conclusion: The findings of this study about the ambidextrous leadership with a bibliometric approach indicate that the results of this study can help to understand the different angles of ambidextrous leadership with the aim of increasing and promoting it.
Methodology: This research in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of execution method was descriptive. The population of this study was conducted researches in the field of ambidextrous leadership in the Scopus database from 2007 to 2023 with a systematic method. For data analysis was used from bibliometric method with the two objectives of functional analysis and citation network analysis and with PRISMA protocol in VOSVIEWR software.
Findings: The results of functional analysis showed that in the field of ambidextrous leadership, Rosing et al had the most citations (583 items) with an article entitled Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. Also, the countries of China, Australia, Germany, England and America respectively had the most research in the field of ambidextrous leadership. In addition, the findings of the citation network analysis showed that there were three clusters for authors and six clusters for countries in the co-citation pattern. Also, the synonymy pattern had 1309 links, 337 keywords and 48 clusters, which most of them were with the keywords of innovation, creativity and leadership.
Conclusion: The findings of this study about the ambidextrous leadership with a bibliometric approach indicate that the results of this study can help to understand the different angles of ambidextrous leadership with the aim of increasing and promoting it.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/04/30 | Accepted: 2023/09/10 | Published: 2023/09/22
Received: 2023/04/30 | Accepted: 2023/09/10 | Published: 2023/09/22
References
1. Alexander L, Van Knippenberg D. (2014). Teams in pursuit of radical innovation: A goal orientation perspective. The Academy of Management Review. 39(4): 423-438. doi: 10.5465/amr.2012.0044 [DOI:10.5465/amr.2012.0044]
2. Alghamdi F. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership, ambidextrous employee, and the interaction between ambidextrous leadership and employee innovative performance. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. 7(1): 1-14. doi: 10.1186/s13731-018-0081-8 [DOI:10.1186/s13731-018-0081-8]
3. Awan U, Kraslawski A, Huiskonen J. (2018). The effects of an ambidextrous leadership on the relationship between governance mechanism and social sustainability. Procedia - Social and Behaviorak Sciences. 238: 398-407. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.017 [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2018.04.017]
4. Bucic T, Robinson L, Ramburuth P. (2010). Effects of leadership style on team learning. Journal of Workplace learning. 22(4): 228-248. doi: 10.1108/13665621011040680 [DOI:10.1108/13665621011040680]
5. Dehghani Soltani M, Soleimani Damaneh R. (2022). The impact of ambidextrous leadership on employee ambidexterity with mediating role of adaptive/flexible behavior. Organizational Behavior Studies Quarterly. 43(3): 31-60. [Persian]
6. Dela Lastra SFP, Martin-Alcazar F, Sanchez-Gardey G. (2022). Developing the ambidextrous organization. The role of intellectual capital in building ambidexterity: An exploratory study in the haute cuisine sector. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management. 51: 321-329. doi: 10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.04.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.04.002]
7. Di Muro P, Lecoeuvre L, Turner R. (2021). Ambidextrous strategy and execution in entrepreneurial project-oriented organizations: The case of Pagani supercars. International Journal of Project Management. 39(1): 45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.09.006 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.09.006]
8. Felicio JA, Caldeirinha V, Dutra A. (2019). Ambidextrous capacity in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Business Research. 101: 607-614. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.061 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.061]
9. Gartner Q, Dorth A, Reinhart G. (2022). Concept for ambidextrous management of incremental and radical innovation in manufacturing. Procedia CIRP. 107: 475-480. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.011 [DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.011]
10. Ghorehjili S, Rahmati MH, Pourkarimi J. (2020). Presentation of the ambidextrous leadership model of universities based on grounded theory (Case study: Tehran state university). Public Organizations Management. 8(2): 143-168. [Persian] doi: 10.30473/IPOM.2020.49929.3901
11. Gratton L, Erickson TJ. (2007). Eight ways to build collaborative teams. Harvard Business Review. 85(11): 100.
12. Hassanzadeh Pasikhani MS, Hassanzadeh Samrein T, Moazen Jamshidi MH, Moazen Jamshidi MH. (2023). The ambidextrous leadership and the job crafting: The mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation and moderating role of organizational social exchange. Transformation Management Journal. 14(2): 150-175. [Persian].
13. doi: 10.22067/tmj.2023.74936.1249
14. Hu W, Luo J, Chen Z, Zhong J. (2020). Ambidextrous leaders helping newcomers get on board: Achieving adjustment and proaction through distinct pathways. Journal of Business Research. 118: 406-414. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.064 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.064]
15. Kassotaki O. (2019). Explaining ambidextrous leadership in the aerospace and defense organizations. European Management Journal. 37(5): 552-563. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2019.04.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2019.04.001]
16. Kemer AS, Hendekci A, Erbil B. (2022). Are nurses innovative or ambidextrous leaders? An evaluation from the perspective of prospective nurses: A structural equation modeling-multiple group analysis. Nurse Education Today. 119: 105574. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105574 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105574] [PMID]
17. Kraus P, Stokes P, Tarba SY, Rodgers P, Dekel-Dachs O, Britzelmaier B, Moore N. (2022). The ambidextrous interaction of RBV-KBV and regional social capital and their impact on SME management. Journal of Business Research. 142: 762-774. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.047 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.047]
18. Luo,B, Zheng S, Ji H, Liang L. (2018). Ambidextrous leadership and TMT-member ambidextrous behavior: the role of TMT behavioral integration and TMT risk propensity. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. 29(2): 338-359. doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2016.1194871 [DOI:10.1080/09585192.2016.1194871]
19. Oluwafemi TB, Mitchelmore S, Nikolopoulos K. (2020). Leading innovation: Empirical evidence for ambidextrous leadership from UK high-tech SMEs. Journal of Business Research. 119: 195-208. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.035 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.035]
20. Omrani M, Karimi A, ZandeHesami H, Seyednaghavi MA. (2022). Ambidextrous leadership model in knowledge-based startups with metasynthesis approach. Jundishapur Education Development Journal. 13(1): 220-233. doi: 10.22118/edc.2022.351527.2122
21. Randhawa K, Wilden R, Gudergan S. (2021). How to innovate toward an ambidextrous business model? The role of dynamic capabilities and market orientation. Journal of Business Research. 130: 618-634. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.046 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.05.046]
22. Rosing K, Frese M, Bausch A. (2011). Explaining the heterogeneity of the leadership-innovation relationship: Ambidextrous leadership. The Leadership Quarterly. 22(5): 956-974. doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014 [DOI:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.07.014]
23. Seepana C, Paulraj A, Huq FA. (2020). The architecture of coopetition: Strategic intent, ambidextrous managers, and knowledge sharing. Industrial Marketing Management. 91: 100-113. doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.08.012 [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.08.012]
24. Simeoni F, Brunetti F, Mion G, Baratta R. (2020). Ambidextrous organizations for sustainable development: The case of fair-trade systems. Journal of Business Research. 112: 549-560. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.020 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.020]
25. Trong Tuan L. (2017). Reform in public organizations: The roles of ambidextrous leadership and moderating mechanisms. Public Management Review. 19(4): 518-541. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2016.1195438 [DOI:10.1080/14719037.2016.1195438]
26. Zacher H, Wilden RG. (2014). A daily diary study on ambidextrous leadership and self‐reported employee innovation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology. 87(4): 813-820. doi: 10.1111/joop.12070 [DOI:10.1111/joop.12070]
27. Zacher H, Robinson AJ, Rosing K. (2016). Ambidextrous leadership and employees' self-reported innovative performance: The role of exploration and exploitation behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 50(1): 24-46. doi: 10.1002/jocb.66 [DOI:10.1002/jocb.66]
28. Zacher H, Rosing K. (2015). Ambidextrous leadership and team innovation. Leadership and Organization Development Journal. 36(1): 54-68. doi: 10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0141 [DOI:10.1108/LODJ-11-2012-0141]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
