Volume 6, Issue 4 (12-2023)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023, 6(4): 53-60 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Nabizadeh A, Ahmadi S M S, Shahi M. (2023). A Comparative Study of E-Learning in the Countries of England and South Korea. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(4), 53-60. doi:10.61186/ijes.6.4.53
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1301-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1301-en.html
1- Department of Faculty of Humanities and Law, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Department of Law, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Department of Law, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
2- Department of Law, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Department of Law, Isfahan (Khorasgan) Branch, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, Iran.
Abstract: (321 Views)
Purpose: The e-learning is one of the new educational methods that can create a competitive advantage for organizations and countries. Therefore, the current research was conducted with the aim of a comparative study of e-learning in the countries of England and South Korea.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was review. The current research population was the e-learning system of countries of England and South Korea, which these two educational systems were examined in terms of similarities and differences. For this purpose, e-learning in the countries of England and South Korea were investigated and the data obtained from e-learning in both countries were compared.
Findings: The findings showed that both countries of England and South Korea in e-learning emphasized on the experience e-learning by creating periodic programs and policies and appropriate to the time, creating two formal and informal education methods, increasing the skills of students and parents about using educational resources, raising media literacy, providing high-quality, free, diverse, attractive and easy-to-use educational content, using the full capabilities of four communication screens of tablets, smart phones, internet TVs and computers for learning, open and collaborative environment for creating creative ideas by the audience, participation in production with curriculum organizations and universities, encouraging and financial support from top creators of educational programs and updating the educational programs and learning practices. On the contrary, in the e-learning of England country emphasized on the creation of content of learning resources suitable to their different nationalities and interests, investing on music videos with appropriate orientation to them, convergence and integration of learning resources and updating and transferring them through the internet, special attention to formal learning programs for under 19 years and using the successes and personal thoughts of users, but in the e-learning of South Korean country emphasis on the financial support from domestic products for the growth of the local content industry in the field of educational documentaries, sharing international educational content by signing a contract with YouTube and holding international conferences and festivals for global interaction with the creators of educational documentaries.
Conclusion: Despite the similarities between e-learning in two countries of England and South Korea, there are differences between e-learning in the two countries. According to the results, the educational planners of Iran country, while paying attention to the cultural context, can provide the basis for better e-learning in the country.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of implementation method was review. The current research population was the e-learning system of countries of England and South Korea, which these two educational systems were examined in terms of similarities and differences. For this purpose, e-learning in the countries of England and South Korea were investigated and the data obtained from e-learning in both countries were compared.
Findings: The findings showed that both countries of England and South Korea in e-learning emphasized on the experience e-learning by creating periodic programs and policies and appropriate to the time, creating two formal and informal education methods, increasing the skills of students and parents about using educational resources, raising media literacy, providing high-quality, free, diverse, attractive and easy-to-use educational content, using the full capabilities of four communication screens of tablets, smart phones, internet TVs and computers for learning, open and collaborative environment for creating creative ideas by the audience, participation in production with curriculum organizations and universities, encouraging and financial support from top creators of educational programs and updating the educational programs and learning practices. On the contrary, in the e-learning of England country emphasized on the creation of content of learning resources suitable to their different nationalities and interests, investing on music videos with appropriate orientation to them, convergence and integration of learning resources and updating and transferring them through the internet, special attention to formal learning programs for under 19 years and using the successes and personal thoughts of users, but in the e-learning of South Korean country emphasis on the financial support from domestic products for the growth of the local content industry in the field of educational documentaries, sharing international educational content by signing a contract with YouTube and holding international conferences and festivals for global interaction with the creators of educational documentaries.
Conclusion: Despite the similarities between e-learning in two countries of England and South Korea, there are differences between e-learning in the two countries. According to the results, the educational planners of Iran country, while paying attention to the cultural context, can provide the basis for better e-learning in the country.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/07/25 | Accepted: 2023/12/19 | Published: 2024/02/20
Received: 2023/07/25 | Accepted: 2023/12/19 | Published: 2024/02/20
References
1. Alatrash R, Priyadarshini R, Ezaldeen H, Alhinnawi A. (2022). Augmented language model with deep learning adaptation on sentiment analysis for e-learning recommendation. Cognitive Systems Research. 75: 53-69. [DOI:10.1016/j.cogsys.2022.07.002]
2. Alqudah NM, Jammal HM, Saleh O, Khader Y, Obeidat N, Alqudah J. (2020). Perception and experience of academic Jordanian ophthalmologists with e-Learning for undergraduate course during the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 59: 44-47. [DOI:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.014] [PMID] []
3. Al-Teete R, Hassan II, Kadir AA, AbuAlRub R. (2023). Nursing lecturers' perception toward e-learning approaches used in nursing colleges: Scoping review. Journal of Professional Nursing. 46: 102-110. [DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2023.03.001] [PMID] []
4. De Ruijter D, Hoving C, Evers S, Hudales R, De Vries H, Smit E. (2019). An economic evaluation of a computer-tailored e-learning program to promote smoking cessation counseling guideline adherence among practice nurses. Patient Education and Counseling. 102(10): 1802-1811. [DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2019.07.015] [PMID]
5. Ghasemi A, Shahriarifard A. (2016). Identifying & ranking of effecting factors on e-learning qualities. Technology of Education Journal. 10(3): 207-218. [Persian]
6. Hamidi Farahani H, Sabouri Khosroshahi H. (2011). The effect of globalization on educational system: A comparative study on UK, Japan and the US. Journal of Strategic Studies of Public Policy. 2(4): 63-94.
7. Hu X, Zhang J, He S, Zhu R, Shen S, Liu B. (2022). E-learning intention of students with anxiety: Evidence from the first wave of COVID-19 pandemic in China. Journal of Affective Disorders. 309: 115-122. [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.121] [PMID] []
8. Hwang S, Kim HK. (2022). Development and validation of the e-learning satisfaction scale (ELSS). Teaching and Learning in Nursing. 17(4): 403-409. [DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2022.02.004]
9. Izadi S, Ghazi S. (2013). A comparative study of curriculum changes in the educational system of Malaysia and South Korea. Birjand University: National conference on changes in the curriculum of education courses, 56-58. [Persian]
10. Karami Baghtifoni Z. (2017). The comparative study of e-training of psychology in the open universities of world. Quarterly Journal of Research in School and Virtual Learning. 5(1): 99-116. [Persian]
11. Lau KH, Lam T, Kam BH, Nkhoma M, Richardson J, Thomas S. (2018). The role of textbook learning resources in e-learning: A taxonomic study. Computers & Education. 118: 10-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.005]
12. Maulana FI, Febriantono MA, Raharja DRB, Herasmara KR. (2023). Twenty years of e-learning in health science: A bibliometric. Procedia Computer Science. 216: 604-612. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.175]
13. McDonald EW, Boulton JL, Davis JL. (2018). E-learning and nursing assessment skills and knowledge - An integrative review. Nurse Education Today. 66: 166-174. [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.011] [PMID]
14. Rashidi H, Movahedian M. (2020). The effective factors model on adoption of e-learning system in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences. Roshd-e-Fanavari. 16(64): 62-70. [Persian] [DOI:10.52547/jstpi.20929.16.64.62]
15. Ren Y, Dai ZX, Zhao XH, Fei MM, Gan WT. (2017). Exploring an on-line course applicability assessment to assist learners in course selection and learning effectiveness improving in e-learning. Learning and Individual Differences. 60: 56-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.09.002]
16. Rujuan W, Lei W. (2022). Research on e-learning behavior evaluation of students based on three-way decisions classification algorithm. Procedia Computer Science. 208: 367-373. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2022.10.052]
17. Vanitha V, Krishnan P, Elakkiya R. (2019). Collaborative optimization algorithm for learning path construction in e-learning. Computers & Electrical Engineering. 77: 325-338. [DOI:10.1016/j.compeleceng.2019.06.016]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
