Volume 5, Issue 3 (Autumn 2022)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2022, 5(3): 260-269 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Dadras M H, Jenaabadi H, Karbalai Harafteh F S. (2022). Comparison the Effectiveness of Bybee's Teaching Method as Face-To-Face and Non-Face-To-Face on the Academic Achievement of Male Students of the First Secondary School in the Conditions of the Covid-19 Pandemic. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 5(3), 260-269. doi:10.61186/ijes.5.3.260
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1325-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1325-en.html
1- PhD student, Department of Educational Psychology, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran.
2- Full Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Zahedan, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran
2- Full Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Zahedan, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Zahedan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zahedan, Iran
Abstract: (1747 Views)
Purpose: The covid-19 pandemic caused many and extensive changes and transformations in educational teaching. Considering the importance of students' academic achievement, the aim of this study was to comparison the effectiveness of Bybee's teaching method as face-to-face and non-face-to-face on the academic achievement of mail students of the first secondary school in the conditions of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Methodology: This study was a semi-experimental with a pretest and posttest design with a control group. The research population was male students of the first secondary school in Zahedan city in the academic years 2019-2020. The sample size was 45 people (15 people for each group) who were selected by cluster sampling method and each of the clusters randomly by lottery replaced in three groups (two experimental groups and one control group). Each of the experimental groups was trained with Bybee's teaching method as face-to-face and non-face-to-face and during this time the control group was trained with the traditional method. The data were collected with Pham and Taylor's academic achievement questionnaire (1999), which whose validity was confirmed by the opinion of experts and its reliability was calculated by Cronbach's alpha method 0.92 and analyzed by methods of univariate analysis of covariance and Bonferroni post hoc test in SPSS software.
Findings: The findings indicated that there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of academic achievement. In the other words, Bybee's teaching method as a both face-to-face and non-face-to-face in compared to the control group caused a significant increase in the academic achievement of mail students of the first secondary school (P<0.001), but between the experimental groups means Bybee's teaching method as face-to-face and non-face-to-face there was no significant difference in increasing academic achievement (P>0.05).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study mean effectiveness of both Bybee's teaching method as face-to-face and non-face-to-face on students' academic achievement and the lack of significant differences between them, to improve academic achievement can be used both Bybee's teaching method as face-to-face and non-face-to-face along with other effective teaching methods.
Methodology: This study was a semi-experimental with a pretest and posttest design with a control group. The research population was male students of the first secondary school in Zahedan city in the academic years 2019-2020. The sample size was 45 people (15 people for each group) who were selected by cluster sampling method and each of the clusters randomly by lottery replaced in three groups (two experimental groups and one control group). Each of the experimental groups was trained with Bybee's teaching method as face-to-face and non-face-to-face and during this time the control group was trained with the traditional method. The data were collected with Pham and Taylor's academic achievement questionnaire (1999), which whose validity was confirmed by the opinion of experts and its reliability was calculated by Cronbach's alpha method 0.92 and analyzed by methods of univariate analysis of covariance and Bonferroni post hoc test in SPSS software.
Findings: The findings indicated that there was a significant difference between the experimental and control groups in terms of academic achievement. In the other words, Bybee's teaching method as a both face-to-face and non-face-to-face in compared to the control group caused a significant increase in the academic achievement of mail students of the first secondary school (P<0.001), but between the experimental groups means Bybee's teaching method as face-to-face and non-face-to-face there was no significant difference in increasing academic achievement (P>0.05).
Conclusion: According to the results of this study mean effectiveness of both Bybee's teaching method as face-to-face and non-face-to-face on students' academic achievement and the lack of significant differences between them, to improve academic achievement can be used both Bybee's teaching method as face-to-face and non-face-to-face along with other effective teaching methods.
Keywords: Bybee's Teaching Method, Face-to-Face Training, Non-Face-to-Face Training, Academic Achievement, Students, Covid-19 Pandemic.
References
1. Abdulmohsen MA. (2017). The effect of Bybee method applying for structural learning on karate sport skills. Journal of Applied Sports Science. 7(1): 19-27. [DOI:10.21608/jass.2017.84598]
2. Al Assaf JAF. (2019). The effectiveness of teaching an educational unit according to the learning cycle-5 Es model"Bybee" in the development of problem-solving skills and academic achievement in geography subject in grade 9 in Jordan. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching. 8(3): 143-159. [DOI:10.5430/jct.v8n3p143]
3. Alipour M, Ghasemi SA, Salar Sadeghi M. (2022). Virtual teaching of mathematics during the Covid-19 pandemic: Narratives of an elementary teacher' experiences. Journal of Research in Elementary Education. 4(8): 52-68. [Persian]
4. Ashraah MM, Mustafa AS. (2021). The effect of teaching according to the Bybee constructive learning model on the acquisition of secondary school students of concepts of Islamic Education in Jordan. Dirasat: Educational Sciences. 48(2): 60-80.
5. Atarod E, Abbasi B. (2022). Comparison the academic performance and mental health of gifted and normal female students. Iranian Journal of Educational Society. 7(2): 154-164. [Persian]
6. Azizi H, Norouzi D, Zarei Zavaraki E. (2015). The effect of Bybee teaching method on learning and educational achievement motivation of students. Biquarterly Journal of Cognitive Strategies in Learning. 3(5): 39-55.[Persian]
7. Cakir NK. (2017). Effect of 5E learning model on academic achievement, attitude and science process skills: Meta-analysis study. Journal of Education and Training Studies. 5(11): 157-170. [DOI:10.11114/jets.v5i11.2649]
8. DeMelo Ghisi GL, Aultman C, Konidis R, Sandison N, Oh P. (2023). Developing a group-based virtual education curriculum for cardiac rehabilitation and the associated toolkit to support implementation in Canada and across the globe. Heart & Lung. 57: 80-94. [DOI:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2022.08.011] [PMID]
9. Eroglu S, Bektas O. (2022). The effect of 5E-based STEM education on academic achievement, scientific creativity, and views on the nature of science. Learning and Individual Differences. 98: 102181. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102181]
10. Faught EL, Qian W, Carson VL, Storey KE, Faulkner G, Veugelers PJ, Leatherdale ST. (2019). The longitudinal impact of diet, physical activity, sleep, and screen time on Canadian adolescents' academic achievement: An analysis from the COMPASS study. Preventive Medicine. 125: 24-31. [DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.05.007] [PMID]
11. Hassevoort KM, Khan NA, Hillman CH, Kramer AF, Cohen NJ. (2018). Relational memory is associated with
12. academic achievement in preadolescent children. Trends in Neuroscience and Education. 13: 8-16.
13. Hu J, Gao C, Liu Y. (2017). Study of the 5E instructional model to improve the instructional design process of novice teachers. Universal Journal of Educational Research. 5(7): 1257-1267. [DOI:10.13189/ujer.2017.050718]
14. Jiang W, Xiao Z, Liu Y, Guo K, Jiang J, Du X. (2019). Reciprocal relations between grit and academic achievement: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences. 71: 13-22. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.02.004]
15. Kabiri M. (2022). Comparison of achievement, output-input (efficiency), and output-process ratios in some provinces based on TIMSS. Research in Curriculum Planning. 19(46): 168-180. [Persian]
16. Karthikeyan S, Densia SP. (2021). The Effect of 5E learning cycle model in teaching physics on students' academic achievement and the permanence of their knowledge. Elementary Education Online. 20(5): 6324-6330.
17. Katagiri M, Ito H, Murayama Y, Hamada M, Nakajima S, Takayanagi N, et al. (2021). Fine and gross motor skills predict later psychosocial maladaptation and academic achievement. Brain and Development. 43(5): 605-615. [DOI:10.1016/j.braindev.2021.01.003] [PMID]
18. Komasi M, Aliabadi Kh, Zaraii Zavaraki E. (2018). Comparing the method of teaching through social network and face training and its impact on the level of learning and retention of adult students in the social sciences. Journal of
19. Education Strategies in Medical. 51(11): 25-32. [Persian]
20. Lai HL, Lee YF, Lai KC. (2020). The influence of humanised anatomical pedagogy on psychophysiological responses and academic achievement in nursing students. Journal of Professional Nursing. 36(4): 245-250. [DOI:10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.11.005] [PMID]
21. Li J, Han X, Wang W, Sun G, Cheng Z. (2018). How social support influences university students' academic achievement and emotional exhaustion: The mediating role of self-esteem. Learning and Individual Differences.61: 120-126. [DOI:10.1016/j.lindif.2017.11.016]
22. Lopez-Lopez JA, Kwong ASF, Washbrook L, Tilling K, Fazel MS, Pearson RM. (2021). Depressive symptoms and academic achievement in UK adolescents: a cross-lagged analysis with genetic covariates. Journal of Affective Disorders. 284: 104-113 [DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2021.01.091]
23. Mohtashami Z, Moradi H, Bigdeli H. (2020). Relationships between academic achievement with personality traits and early maladaptive schemas with self-determination mediation in students. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 3(1): 176-188. [DOI:10.52547/ijes.3.1.176]
24. Mousavi F. (2019). Training based teaching model Bybee step (5e) on learning and motivate student achievement. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration. 10(1): 1-14. [Persian]
25. Nazziwa C, Uwamahoro J, Wakumire R. (2022). Impact of inquiry-based learning using the 5E model on teachers' practices and learners' achievement in force and motion in secondary schools of Jinja District, Uganda. East African Journal of Education and Social Sciences. 3(5): 137-148. [DOI:10.46606/eajess2022v03i05.0228]
26. Pandey S, Tiwari S. (2014). Education and prosperity through technology- Case of virtual education limited,Nigeria. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences. 157: 55-62. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.009]
27. Pham LB, Taylor SE. (1999). From thought to action: Effects of process- versus outcome-based mental simulations on performance. Society for Personality and Social Psychology.25(2): 250-260. [DOI:10.1177/0146167299025002010]
28. Pouladi Borj H, Khalegkhah A, Heidari H, Davoodi H. (2021). Presenting the pattern of personality components and psychological factors affecting teachers' teaching during the outbreak of Covid-19. Journal of Research in Behavioral Sciences. 19(3): 519-528. [Persian] [DOI:10.52547/rbs.19.3.519]
29. Rostamnezhad F, Sardari B. (2021). The effectiveness of education based on the Bybee's five-step teaching pattern(5E) on academic competency and academic flow. Journal of Education Studies. 7(27):1-13. [Persian]
30. Sotakova I, Ganajova M. (2023). The effect of the 5E instructional model on students' cognitive processes and their attitudes towards chemistry as a subject. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.19(9): em2317:1-22. [DOI:10.29333/ejmste/13469]
31. Tegegne TA, Kelkay AD. (2023). Comparative study of using 5E learning cycle and the traditional teaching method [DOI:10.1080/2331186X.2023.2199634]
32. in chemistry to improve student understanding of water concept: The case of primary school. Cogent Education. 10(1): 2199634.
33. Ulas AH, Sevim O, Tan E. (2012). The effect of worksheets based upon 5e learning cycle model on student success in teaching of adjectives as grammatical components. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences. 31: 391-398. [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.072]
34. Yasbolaghi Sharahi B, Zare M, Sarikhani R. (2016). Effects of the Bybee (5E) teaching method on learning and retention in the basic concepts of nursing. Journal of Nursing Education. 5(1): 30-37. [Persian]
35. Zaheri A, Es'haghi Z, Kheiri S, Ghaderi H. (2021). Investigating the relationship between emotional intelligence and academic achievement and academic motivation in students of Shahrekord Paramedical School in 1397-1398.Horizon of Medical Education Development. 12(2): 21-32. [Persian]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
