Volume 6, Issue 4 (12-2023)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023, 6(4): 39-52 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Fallah Razavi M, Hashemiannejad F, Kohestani H A. (2023). Designing the Organizational Learning Capacity Development Model with an Entrepreneur University Approach. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(4), 39-52. doi:10.61186/ijes.6.4.39
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1347-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1347-en.html
1- Department of Educational Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran
2- Department of Educational Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran.
2- Department of Educational Sciences, Mashhad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University, Mashhad, Iran.
Abstract: (911 Views)
Purpose: The success of universities depends on their ability to respond and adapt to environmental changes and developments. Therefore, the purpose of this study was designing the organizational learning capacity development model with an entrepreneur university approach.
Methodology: In a qualitative study on 24 experts familiar with the field of research and relevant documents in this field, the organizational learning capacity development model with an entrepreneur university approach was investigated. The experts of the current research were selected by purposeful and snowball sampling methods and were underwent to three rounds of Delphi. The data were collected by taking notes from the documents and checking the level of agreement of the experts and were analyzed by coding methods and the percentage of agreement with the Delphi method.
Findings: The findings of coding indicated that the organizational learning capacity development model with an entrepreneur university approach had 81 components in 21 dimensions. The results showed that in the first round of Delphi 3 components, in the second round of Delphi 4 components and in the third round of Delphi 2 components were removed, and finally, for the organizational learning capacity development model with an entrepreneur university approach were identified 72 components in 21 dimensions with an agreement percentage of higher than 70% for all components.
Conclusion: The results of this study help to better understand the methods of organizational learning capacity development with an entrepreneur university approach. Therefore, universal specialists and planners in order to improve organizational learning capacity can provide the basis for improving the identified dimensions and components in the current research.
Methodology: In a qualitative study on 24 experts familiar with the field of research and relevant documents in this field, the organizational learning capacity development model with an entrepreneur university approach was investigated. The experts of the current research were selected by purposeful and snowball sampling methods and were underwent to three rounds of Delphi. The data were collected by taking notes from the documents and checking the level of agreement of the experts and were analyzed by coding methods and the percentage of agreement with the Delphi method.
Findings: The findings of coding indicated that the organizational learning capacity development model with an entrepreneur university approach had 81 components in 21 dimensions. The results showed that in the first round of Delphi 3 components, in the second round of Delphi 4 components and in the third round of Delphi 2 components were removed, and finally, for the organizational learning capacity development model with an entrepreneur university approach were identified 72 components in 21 dimensions with an agreement percentage of higher than 70% for all components.
Conclusion: The results of this study help to better understand the methods of organizational learning capacity development with an entrepreneur university approach. Therefore, universal specialists and planners in order to improve organizational learning capacity can provide the basis for improving the identified dimensions and components in the current research.
Keywords: Development, Organizational Learning Capacity, Entrepreneur University, Continuous Training, Organizational Environment Development
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/09/30 | Accepted: 2023/12/18 | Published: 2024/02/20
Received: 2023/09/30 | Accepted: 2023/12/18 | Published: 2024/02/20
References
1. Agyabeng-Mensah Y, Tang L, Afum E, Baah C, Dacosta E. (2021). Organisational identity and circular economy: Are inter and intra organisational learning, lean management and zero waste practices worth pursuing? Sustainable Production and Consumption. 28: 648-662. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.018 [DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2021.06.018]
2. Basic M. (2021). Organisational learning antecedents and open innovation: Differences in internationalisation level. International Journal of Innovation Studies. 5(4): 161-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijis.2021.12.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijis.2021.12.001]
3. Behzadi N, Razavi SM, Hosseini SR. (2015). Designing a conceptual model for an entrepreneurial university; Using corporate entrepreneurship approach. Journal of Entrepreneurship Development. 7(4): 697-713. [Persian] doi: 10.22059/jed.2014.53625
4. Bouma D, Canbaloglu G, Treur J, Wiewiora A. (2023). Adaptive network modeling of the influence of leadership and communication on learning within an organization. Cognitive Systems Research. 79: 55-70. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.01.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.01.003]
5. Bukhari E, Dabic M, Shifrer D, Daim T, Meissner D. (2021). Entrepreneurial university: The relationship between smart specialization innovation strategies and university-region collaboration. Technology in Society. 65: 101560. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101560 [DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101560]
6. Calvo N, Rodeiro-Pazos D, Rodriguez-Gulias MJ, Fernandez-Lopez S. (2019). What knowledge management approach do entrepreneurial universities need? Information Systems. 85: 21-29. doi: 10.1016/j.is.2019.06.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.is.2019.06.002]
7. Chavoshi Z, Khashei V. (2022). The effect of organizational learning mechanisms on strategic innovation capacity. Journal of Strategic Management Studies. 13(50): 21-38. [Persian] doi: 10.22034/smsj.2022.135056
8. Cinar F, Eren E. (2015). Organizational learning capacity impact on sustainable innovation: The case of public hospitals. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 181: 251-260. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.886 [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.886]
9. Comlek O, Kitapci H, Celik V, Ozsahin M. (2012). The effects of organizational learning capacity on firm innovative performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 41: 367-374. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.043 [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.043]
10. Dabic M, Gonzalez-Loureiro M, Daim TU. (2015). Unraveling the attitudes on entrepreneurial universities: The case of Croatian and Spanish universities. Technology in Society. 42: 167-178. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.007 [DOI:10.1016/j.techsoc.2015.05.007]
11. Deperi J, Bertrand O, Meschi PX, Nesta L. (2022). An organizational learning approach to digital and non-digital firm acquisition behavior. European Management Journal. 40(6): 873-882. doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.005 [DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2022.09.005]
12. Esmaeilzadeh A, Irannezhad P, Jahanian R, Ghasemzadeh A. (2021). The role of informal learning and organizational learning capacity in learning motivation and professional ethics of faculty members in the Eastern Azerbaijan universities. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 4(1): 196-205.
13. Fuster E, Padilla-Melendez A, Lockett N, Del-Aguila-Obra A. (2019). The emerging role of university spin-off companies in developing regional entrepreneurial university ecosystems: The case of Andalusia. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 141: 219-231. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.020 [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.020]
14. Ghahremanpour P, Zonoozi SJ, Abolfazli SA. (2020). Studying the effects of organizational
15. resilience capacity and organizational learning on marketing performance: With the mediating effect of product innovativeness and moderating role of environmental turbulence. Journal of Business Management. 12(1): 183-197. [Persian] doi: 10.22059/jibm.2019.269367.3319
16. Gilmore A, McAuley A, Miles MP, Pattinson H. (2020). Four questions of entrepreneurial marketing education: Perspectives of university educators. Journal of Business Research. 113: 189-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.016 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.016]
17. Guerrero M, Cunningham JA, Urbano D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities' activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy. 44(3): 748-764. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.008 [DOI:10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.008]
18. Khakrah F, Malekian F, Saeidipour B, Kavyani E. (2019). Designing the pattern of organizational factors affecting the transfer of learning to the workplace based on grounded theory. Journal of Research in Teaching. 6(4): 66-85. [Persian]
19. Laguia A, Moriano JA, Gorgievski MJ. (2019). A psychosocial study of self-perceived creativity and entrepreneurial intentions in a sample of university students. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 31: 44-57. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.tsc.2018.11.004]
20. Lyman B, Cowan LA, Hoyt HC. (2017). Organizational learning in a college of
21. nursing: A learning history. Nurse Education Today. 61: 134-139. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.004] [PMID]
22. Lyman B, Prothero MM, Parchment J. (2023). Building organizational learning capacity: A road map for nurse executives. Nurse Leader. 21(4): 86-90. doi: 10.1016/j.mnl.2022.12.019 [DOI:10.1016/j.mnl.2022.12.019]
23. Moafimadani SK, Kazempour E, Khalkhali A, Rahimaghaee F. (2020). Designing an organizational learning management model for nurses. Journal of Military Caring Sciences. 7(4): 381-393. doi: 10.52547/mcs.7.4.381 [DOI:10.52547/mcs.7.4.381]
24. Mortezaei H, Salehi M, Niazazari K. (2018). Identify factors affecting the internationalization
25. dimension in entrepreneurial university and its role in creating a knowledge-based economy. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 1(7): 129-140.
26. Muscio A, Ramaciotti L. (2019). How does academia influence Ph.D. entrepreneurship? New insights on the entrepreneurial university. Technovation. 82-83: 16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2019.02.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.technovation.2019.02.003]
27. Omranzadeh E, Khoshchehreh M, Monavarian A, Alaei H. (2017). Explaining the organizational learning pattern in the employees of NIPC. Quarterly Journal of Public Organizations Management. 5(3): 97-116. [Persian]
28. Rass L, Treur J, Kucharska W, Wiewiora A. (2023). Adaptive dynamical systems modelling of transformational organizational change with focus on organizational culture and organizational learning. Cognitive Systems Research. 79: 85-108. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.01.004 [DOI:10.1016/j.cogsys.2023.01.004]
29. Salouki M, Ghorbani M, Zabihi MR, Niroumand HA. (2020). Designing a knowledge management deployment model with an organizational learning approach. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 3(4): 19-30. doi: 10.52547/ijes.3.4.19 [DOI:10.52547/ijes.3.4.19]
30. Sanchez-Barrioluengo M, Benneworth P. (2019). Is the entrepreneurial university also regionally engaged? Analysing the influence of university's structural configuration on third mission performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 141: 206-218. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.017 [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.017]
31. Sidrat S, Frikha MA. (2018). Impact of the qualities of the manager and type of university on the development of the entrepreneurial university. The Journal of High Technology Management Research. 29(1): 27-34. doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.003]
32. Starostina A, Bugrov V, Kravchenko V, Gatto G, Kochkina N. (2023). Entrepreneurial university: Exploring its essence, phases of development, and operating mechanism during wartime in Ukraine. International Journal of Educational Development. 103: 102895. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102895 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102895]
33. Wakkee I, Nander Sijde P, Vaupell C, Ghuman K. (2019). The university's role in sustainable development: Activating entrepreneurial scholars as agents of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 141: 195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.013 [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.013]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
