Volume 6, Issue 4 (12-2023)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023, 6(4): 126-138 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Shabazi S, Norian M, Norouzi D. (2023). Identifying the Dimensions and Components of School Evaluation based on the Effective Components of Top Schools: A Qualitative Research. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(4), 126-138. doi:10.61186/ijes.6.4.126
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1379-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1379-en.html
1- PhD student, Department of Educational Management, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran (Corresponding Author).
3- Associate Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, South Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (224 Views)
Purpose: The effectiveness of schools including in the field of evaluation creates a competitive advantage for schools in compared to other schools. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identifying the dimensions and components of school evaluation based on the effective components of top schools.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of execution method was qualitative. The population of study was the faculty members and staff and senior experts of education of Tehran province in 2020 year, which according to the principle of theoretical saturation 14 people were selected as a sample with using the purposive sampling method. The tool of the study was a semi-structured interview, which whose data were analyzed by open, axial and selective coding method in Maxqda software.
Findings: The findings showed that the school evaluation based on the effective components of top schools had 19 components in 6 dimensions including planning (2 components), evaluation (3 components), education and innovation (3 components), management and leadership (6 components), facilities (3 components) and cultural and social (2 components). Finally, the pattern of school evaluation dimensions and components based on the effective components of top schools was drawn.
Conclusion: The identified dimensions and components for evaluating schools based on the effective components of top schools can be used by experts and curriculum planners to improve the state of the educational system.
Methodology: This study in terms of purpose was applied and in terms of execution method was qualitative. The population of study was the faculty members and staff and senior experts of education of Tehran province in 2020 year, which according to the principle of theoretical saturation 14 people were selected as a sample with using the purposive sampling method. The tool of the study was a semi-structured interview, which whose data were analyzed by open, axial and selective coding method in Maxqda software.
Findings: The findings showed that the school evaluation based on the effective components of top schools had 19 components in 6 dimensions including planning (2 components), evaluation (3 components), education and innovation (3 components), management and leadership (6 components), facilities (3 components) and cultural and social (2 components). Finally, the pattern of school evaluation dimensions and components based on the effective components of top schools was drawn.
Conclusion: The identified dimensions and components for evaluating schools based on the effective components of top schools can be used by experts and curriculum planners to improve the state of the educational system.
Keywords: School evaluation, top schools, education and innovation, management and leadership, cultural and social
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2023/11/14 | Accepted: 2024/01/24 | Published: 1901/12/14
Received: 2023/11/14 | Accepted: 2024/01/24 | Published: 1901/12/14
References
1. Abbasi H, Mohammadi Naeeni M, Nateghi F. (2023). Explaining the effectiveness of elementary schools based on the document of the fundamental transformation of education. Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership & Administration. 17(1): 214-247. [Persian]
2. Bell L, Thom B, Chino F. (2023). Value-based health care: Evaluating the education of future radiation oncologists on costs and affordability. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 20(1): 59-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.11.008 [DOI:10.1016/j.jacr.2022.11.008] [PMID] []
3. Beyramipour A, Sharif M, Jafaree SE, Moulavi H. (2011). Identification and ranking of factors affecting the implementation of descriptive evaluation model in Iranian primary schools. Journal of Curriculum Research. 1(2): 1-28. [Persian] doi: 10.22099/jcr.2012.248
4. De Leo AN, Rayckman JM, Fields EC, Jimenez R, Saraf A, Sherer M, et al. (2022). Treatment plan evaluation workshops for residents: Learning the ROPES (radiation oncology plan evaluation school). International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 114(1): 1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.012 [DOI:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.06.012]
5. Dolati AA, Jamshidi L, AminBedokhti AA. (2016). Improving the teaching-learning process of smart schools from the perspective of evaluation. Studies in Learning & Instruction. 7(2): 1-20. [Persian] doi: 10.22099/jsli.2016.3687 [DOI:10.5812/ijvlms.12149]
6. Falsafinejad MR, Delavar A, Zandi F, Farokhi NA, Abaspour A. (2017). Identify resources and effective equipment in the ranking and evaluation of the performance of the elementary schools section in Kurdistan province. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration. 8(29): 71-88. [Persian]
7. Feng R, Zhang J, Wu Y, Wu R, Yao B. (2023). School accessibility evaluation under mixed-load school bus routing problem strategies. Transport Policy. 131: 75-86. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.12.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.12.001]
8. Ghaemi F, Mirkamali SM, Rostami R, Salehi K. (2020). Effective factors in Evaluation of the Performance of School Principals: A Meta-synthesis. Journal of School Administration. 8(4): 50-72. [Persian] doi: 10.34785/J010.2021.925
9. Gregory A, Huang F, Ward-Seidel AR. (2022). Evaluation of the whole school restorative practices project: One-year impact on discipline incidents. Journal of School Psychology. 95: 58-71. doi: /10.1016/j.jsp.2022.09.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2022.09.003] [PMID]
10. HajHassani S, Batmani F, Hosseinpour S. (2020). Presenting an adequacy based model for elementary school principals. Journal of School Administration. 8(4): 160-181. [Persian] doi: 10.34785/J010.2021.482
11. Jalali K, Talebi Z, Hashemi SA. (2021). competency-based model for the evaluation of the fundamental reform document of education in Sama secondary schools: A qualitative study. Jundishapur Education Development Journal. 12(Special Issue): 154-165. [Persian] doi: 10.22118/edc.2021.269741.1689
12. Keivan Bonehkohal MM, Khanzadi K, Rezghi Shirsavar H. (2023). Identifying the dimensions of mentoring for school principals of Tehran province. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(2): 176-190. [Persian] doi: 10.61186/ijes.6.2.176 [DOI:10.61186/ijes.6.2.176]
13. Kouzmina E, Mann S, Chaplin T, Zevin B. (2021). An evaluation of the surgical foundations curriculum: A national study. Journal of Surgical Education. 78(3): 914-926. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.10.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.10.002] [PMID]
14. Leite C, Fernandes P, Mouraz A. (2014). Curriculum contextualization: A comparative analysis of meanings expressed in Portuguese and English school evaluation. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 43: 133-138. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.10.001 [DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2014.10.001]
15. Liu P, Wang X, Teng F, Li Y, Wang F. (2022). Distance education quality evaluation based on multigranularity probabilistic linguistic term sets and disappointment theory. Information Sciences. 605: 159-181. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.034 [DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2022.05.034]
16. Magulod GC. (2017). Factors of school effectiveness and performance of selected public and private elementary schools: Implications on educational planning in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research. 5(1): 73-83.
17. Maier A, Daniel J, Oakes J, Lam L. (2018). Community schools a promising foundation for progress. American Educator. 2018(2): 17-22.
18. Nazari Ardabili SZ, Banisi P, Vatankhah H. (2023). Identification and analysis of effective factors on the maturity management model of educational technology in Iranian schools. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(2): 191-202. doi: 10.61186/ijes.6.2.191 [DOI:10.61186/ijes.6.2.191]
19. Omorou AY, Manneville F, Achit H, Langlois J, Legrand K, Lecomte E, Briancon S. (2023). Economic evaluation of a school-based strategy to prevent overweight and obesity in French adolescents: insights from the PRALIMAP randomised trial. Public Health. 215: 75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2022.11.025 [DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2022.11.025] [PMID]
20. Rodrigues LS, Dos Santos M, Junior CDR. (2022). Application of DEA and group analysis using K-means; compliance in the context of the performance evaluation of school networks. Procedia Computer Science. 199: 687-696. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.085 [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.085]
21. Shahbazi Sh, Nourian M. (2019). Effective components of top schools. The 1st National Conference of the Future School.
22. Smith A. (2023). Evaluating policy consistency in preparticipation physical evaluations for high school athletes. Journal of Pediatric Health Care. 37(3): 315-318. doi: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2022.12.002 [DOI:10.1016/j.pedhc.2022.12.002] [PMID]
23. Taheri A, Taghipour Zahir A, Jafari P. (2018). Presenting a model for evaluating the performance of first secondary schools (case study: Razavi Khorasan province). Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership & Administration. 12(3): 161-179. [Persian]
24. Zhao D, Ma X, Qiao S. (2017). What aspects should be evaluated when evaluating graduate curriculum: Analysis based on student interview. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 54: 50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.11.003 [DOI:10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.11.003]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
