Volume 7, Issue 2 (8-2024)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2024, 7(2): 98-105 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Asgharinezhad S, Rezghi Shirsavar H, Khanzadi K. (2024). Identifying the Dimensions and Components of Internet of Things (IoT) Development in Schools Based on Futurology. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 7(2), 98-105. doi:10.61838/kman.ijes.7.2.12
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1401-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1401-en.html
1- PhD Student, Department of Educational Management, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.
2- Faculty member, Department of Educational Management, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.
2- Faculty member, Department of Educational Management, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.
Abstract: (887 Views)
Purpose: Futurology plays a significant role in advancing organizational goals and mitigating organizational problems and challenges. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify the dimensions and components of Internet of Things development in schools based on future studies.
Methodology: In a descriptive qualitative study, 19 academic and organizational experts from the educational sector of Tehran were interviewed in the academic year 2020-2021 using a semi-structured method. In this study, the sample size was determined according to the principle of theoretical saturation and was selected through purposive sampling. The research tool was a semi-structured interview, whose validity was confirmed through triangulation and whose reliability was calculated at 0.88 using the agreement coefficient between two coders. The data of this study were analyzed using thematic analysis in MAXQDA software, version 2020.
Findings: The analysis indicated that the development of the Internet of Things in schools based on future studies encompasses 26 components across 7 dimensions. These dimensions include the elimination of time constraints (with 3 components), elimination of spatial constraints (with 4 components), reduction of infrastructure costs (with 4 components), knowledge management (with 3 components), professional competence (with 3 components), information technology (with 3 components), and effectiveness of the educational system (with 6 components). Ultimately, a thematic network for the development of the Internet of Things in schools based on future studies was established.
Conclusion: The model of dimensions and components designed in this study can assist specialists and educational system officials in improving the development of the Internet of Things in schools.
Methodology: In a descriptive qualitative study, 19 academic and organizational experts from the educational sector of Tehran were interviewed in the academic year 2020-2021 using a semi-structured method. In this study, the sample size was determined according to the principle of theoretical saturation and was selected through purposive sampling. The research tool was a semi-structured interview, whose validity was confirmed through triangulation and whose reliability was calculated at 0.88 using the agreement coefficient between two coders. The data of this study were analyzed using thematic analysis in MAXQDA software, version 2020.
Findings: The analysis indicated that the development of the Internet of Things in schools based on future studies encompasses 26 components across 7 dimensions. These dimensions include the elimination of time constraints (with 3 components), elimination of spatial constraints (with 4 components), reduction of infrastructure costs (with 4 components), knowledge management (with 3 components), professional competence (with 3 components), information technology (with 3 components), and effectiveness of the educational system (with 6 components). Ultimately, a thematic network for the development of the Internet of Things in schools based on future studies was established.
Conclusion: The model of dimensions and components designed in this study can assist specialists and educational system officials in improving the development of the Internet of Things in schools.
Keywords: Internet of Things, schools, futures research, knowledge management, information technology, educational system effectiveness
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2024/02/27 | Accepted: 2024/04/21 | Published: 2024/05/12
Received: 2024/02/27 | Accepted: 2024/04/21 | Published: 2024/05/12
References
1. Ahmad, S., Umirzakova, S., Jamil, F., & Whangbo, T. K. (2022). Internet-of-things-enabled serious games: A comprehensive survey. Future Generation Computer Systems, 136, 67-83. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167739X22001972 [DOI:10.1016/j.future.2022.05.026]
2. Askari, Z., Hasanpour, E., Ranjbar, M. H., & Mohebi, S. (2021). Model of Internet TV Development in Iran Using Marketing Approach [Research Article]. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 4(3), 92-104. [DOI:10.52547/ijes.4.3.92]
3. Atlam, H. F., El-Din Hemdan, E., Alenezi, A., Alassafi, M. O., & Wills, G. B. (2020). Internet of Things Forensics: A Review. Internet of Things, 11, 100220. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542660520300536 [DOI:10.1016/j.iot.2020.100220]
4. Cheng, H., Shi, Y., Wu, L., Guo, Y., & Xiong, N. (2021). An intelligent scheme for big data recovery in Internet of Things based on Multi-Attribute assistance and Extremely randomized trees. Information Sciences, 557, 66-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.ins.2020.12.041]
5. Cranmer, E. E., Papalexi, M., tom Dieck, M. C., & Bamford, D. (2022). Internet of Things: Aspiration, implementation and contribution. Journal of Business Research, 139, 69-80. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.025]
6. Di Zio, S., Tontodimamma, A., del Gobbo, E., & Fontanella, L. (2023). Exploring the research dynamics of futures studies: An analysis of six top journals. Futures, 153, 103232. [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2023.103232]
7. Fergnani, A. (2019). Mapping futures studies scholarship from 1968 to present: A bibliometric review of thematic clusters, research trends, and research gaps. Futures, 105, 104-123. [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2018.09.007]
8. Gharakhani, M., & Pourhashemi, S. O. (2021). Analyzing the Influencing Factors in the Acceptance of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the Iranian Insurance Industry. https://www.sid.ir/fileserver/jf/4003814010104.pdf
9. Goyal, P., Sahoo, A. K., Sharma, T. K., & Singh, P. K. (2021). Internet of Things: Applications, security and privacy: A survey. Materials Today: Proceedings, 34, 752-759. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221478532033385X [DOI:10.1016/j.matpr.2020.04.737]
10. Gul, S., Asif, M., Ahmad, S., Yasir, M., Majid, M., Malik, M. S. A., & Arshad, S. (2017). A survey on role of internet of things in education. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 17(5), 159-165. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Muhammad-Yasir-5/publication/345896193_A_Survey_on_Role_of_Internet_of_Things_in_Education/links/5fb11b8b92851cf24cd29ba7/A-Survey-on-Role-of-Internet-of-Things-in-Education.pdf
11. Khedmatgozar, H. R. (2015). The role of internet of things (IOT) in knowledge management systems (Case study: Performance management of Yazd municipality staff). Journal of Information Technology Management, 7(3), 553-572. https://jitm.ut.ac.ir/article_53318_7227.htmlhttps:/jitm.ut.ac.ir/article_53916.html
12. Kuusi, O., Lauhakangas, O., & Ruttas-Küttim, R. (2016). From metaphoric litany text to scenarios-How to use metaphors in futures studies. Futures, 84, 124-132. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328715300938 [DOI:10.1016/j.futures.2016.03.014]
13. Lashkari, N., Salehi, M., & Zamani, F. (2021). Presenting a futures research model to improve the quality of research activities in Islamic Azad universities of Mazandaran province. Educational Development of Judishapur, 12(1), 119-130. [DOI:10.22118/edc.2020.240043.1454]
14. Li, J., Zhi, J., Hu, W., Wang, L., & Yang, A. (2020). Research on the improvement of vision target tracking algorithm for Internet of things technology and Simple extended application in pellet ore phase. Future Generation Computer Systems, 110, 233-242. [DOI:10.1016/j.future.2020.04.014]
15. Mohammadi, H., & Hematian, H. (2022). Investigating the Effect of Internet of Things on Human Resource Development and Training in the Organization (Case Study: State Airlines). Journal of Managing Education in Organizations, 11(1), 99-118. https://journalieaa.ir/browse.php?a_id=237&sid=1&slc_lang=en
16. Mohammadian, M., Sedighi, M., & Serkani, M. (2022). Selection of Internet of things (IOT) applications in education industry using the Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Method. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ), 16(2), 363-386. https://jte.sru.ac.ir/article_1696_en.html
17. Mousakhani, M., Saghafi, F., Hasanzadeh, M., & Sadeghi, M. E. (2022). Proposing dynamic model of functional interactions of iot technological innovation system by using system dynamics and fuzzy DEMATEL. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.11847. https://arxiv.org/abs/2206.11847
18. Palmaccio, M., Dicuonzo, G., & Belyaeva, Z. S. (2021). The internet of things and corporate business models: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 131, 610-618. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296320306500 [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.09.069]
19. Rao, A. R., & Elias-Medina, A. (2024). Designing an internet of things laboratory to improve student understanding of secure IoT systems. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 4, 154-166. [DOI:10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.10.002]
20. Rezapour, I., Shojaei, A., & Hosseini, S. Z. (2021). Provide a local model of police training and education with a futures research approach The role of the police in ensuring the rights of the accused. https://www.sid.ir/paper/954139/en
21. Terzieva, V., Ilchev, S., & Todorova, K. (2022). The Role of Internet of Things in Smart Education. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(11), 108-113. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405896322011466 [DOI:10.1016/j.ifacol.2022.08.057]
22. Wang, S., Liu, H., Sun, Q., Zhai, Y., & Liu, D. (2022). Cryptogovernance for Security Supervision in the Internet of Things. Procedia Computer Science, 202, 260-268. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2022.04.034]
23. Wicaksono, S., Galang, M., Suryani, E., & Hendrawan, R. A. (2022). Increasing productivity of rice plants based on IoT (Internet Of Things) to realize Smart Agriculture using System Thinking approach. Procedia Computer Science, 197, 607-616. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.179]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
