Volume 7, Issue 2 (8-2024)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2024, 7(2): 181-189 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Asadi Dezaki B, Dalvi Esfahan M R, Shirvani A. (2024). Design and Elaboration of the Neuro-Coaching Education Model (Neuroscience of Coaching). Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 7(2), 181-189. doi:10.61838/kman.ijes.7.2.22
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1443-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1443-en.html
1- PhD student, Department of Management, Dehaghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Management, Dehaghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Management, Dehaghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dehaghan, Iran.
Abstract: (746 Views)
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to design and elaborate the neuro-coaching model (neuroscience of coaching) at Isfahan Steel Company.
Methodology: This research is an applied study and, in terms of methodology, a mixed-methods (qualitative-quantitative) research. The statistical population of the study consisted of 15 experts from Islamic Azad Universities and managers of the Isfahan Steel Company. In the qualitative section, their opinions were used to identify and code the categories. For modeling purposes, the statistical population included a group of officials from the Isfahan Steel Company. Cochran's formula was used for sampling, resulting in a sample size of 384, and the sampling method was randomly accessible. To identify the factors, interviews were conducted initially, and with the help of open coding, selective coding, and axial coding, categories and concepts were extracted.
Findings: The results of included 41 axial codes and 251 open codes. Subsequently, in the next stage, using confirmatory factor analysis, the axial, causal, contextual, intervening conditions, strategies, and outcomes were examined. Finally, consensus was reached on 209 open codes and 40 selective codes. For modeling, structural equations and partial least squares (PLS) with Smart PLS software were utilized. The results indicated that the neuro-coaching model (neuroscience of coaching) at Isfahan Steel Company is underpinned by 8 causal conditions, 8 contextual conditions, 6 intervening factors, and 7 strategies, leading to 11 major outcomes for Isfahan Steel Company. These outcomes include: improved neural process performance, personal growth and development, empowerment and psychological improvement, enhanced interactions and satisfaction, improved performance and cost reduction, psychology and personal relationships, interaction and communications, personal and psychological growth, individual and professional development, interactions and exercises, and the quality and effectiveness of neural solutions.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the neuro-coaching model holds significant promise for transforming coaching practices and enhancing organizational outcomes. The integration of neuroscience principles provides a robust framework for developing more effective and scientifically grounded coaching interventions.
Methodology: This research is an applied study and, in terms of methodology, a mixed-methods (qualitative-quantitative) research. The statistical population of the study consisted of 15 experts from Islamic Azad Universities and managers of the Isfahan Steel Company. In the qualitative section, their opinions were used to identify and code the categories. For modeling purposes, the statistical population included a group of officials from the Isfahan Steel Company. Cochran's formula was used for sampling, resulting in a sample size of 384, and the sampling method was randomly accessible. To identify the factors, interviews were conducted initially, and with the help of open coding, selective coding, and axial coding, categories and concepts were extracted.
Findings: The results of included 41 axial codes and 251 open codes. Subsequently, in the next stage, using confirmatory factor analysis, the axial, causal, contextual, intervening conditions, strategies, and outcomes were examined. Finally, consensus was reached on 209 open codes and 40 selective codes. For modeling, structural equations and partial least squares (PLS) with Smart PLS software were utilized. The results indicated that the neuro-coaching model (neuroscience of coaching) at Isfahan Steel Company is underpinned by 8 causal conditions, 8 contextual conditions, 6 intervening factors, and 7 strategies, leading to 11 major outcomes for Isfahan Steel Company. These outcomes include: improved neural process performance, personal growth and development, empowerment and psychological improvement, enhanced interactions and satisfaction, improved performance and cost reduction, psychology and personal relationships, interaction and communications, personal and psychological growth, individual and professional development, interactions and exercises, and the quality and effectiveness of neural solutions.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the neuro-coaching model holds significant promise for transforming coaching practices and enhancing organizational outcomes. The integration of neuroscience principles provides a robust framework for developing more effective and scientifically grounded coaching interventions.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2024/04/5 | Accepted: 2024/05/29 | Published: 2024/06/2
Received: 2024/04/5 | Accepted: 2024/05/29 | Published: 2024/06/2
References
1. Boyatzis, R. E., Hullinger, A., Ehasz, S. F., Harvey, J., Tassarotti, S., Gallotti, A., & Penafort, F. (2022). The Grand Challenge for Research on the Future of Coaching. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 58(2), 202-222. [DOI:10.1177/00218863221079937]
2. Boyatzis, R. E., & Jack, A. I. (2018). The Neuroscience of Coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal Practice and Research, 70(1), 11-27. [DOI:10.1037/cpb0000095]
3. Camiré, M., Rocchi, M., & Kendellen, K. (2017). A Comparative Analysis of Physical Education and Non-Physical Education Teachers Who Coach High School Sport Teams. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 12(5), 557-564. [DOI:10.1177/1747954117727629]
4. Cushion, C. J., Griffiths, M., & Armour, K. (2017). Professional Coach Educators in-Situ: A Social Analysis of Practice. Sport Education and Society, 24(5), 533-546. [DOI:10.1080/13573322.2017.1411795]
5. Dyess, S., Sherman, R. O., Opalinski, A., & Eggenberger, T. (2017). Structured Coaching Programs to Develop Staff. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 48(8), 373-378. [DOI:10.3928/00220124-20170712-10] [PMID]
6. Erickson, K., Bruner, M. W., MacDonald, D. J., & Côté, J. (2008). Gaining Insight Into Actual and Preferred Sources of Coaching Knowledge. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 3(4), 527-538. [DOI:10.1260/174795408787186468]
7. Fried, R. R. (2019). Coping Through Coaching: Co-Active Life Coaching as a Method for Stress and Anxiety Management. Health Science Inquiry, 5(1). [DOI:10.29173/hsi166]
8. George, J. E. (2023). Neuroscience Leadership. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 55(4), 112-112.
https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000711 [DOI:10.1097/jnn.0000000000000711] [PMID]
9. Gozzoli, C., Frascaroli, D., & Licari, G. (2014). Connecting Personal History and Organizational Context: Suggestions for Developing Educational Programs for Youth Soccer Coaches. World Futures, 70(2), 140-156. [DOI:10.1080/02604027.2014.903115]
10. Grant, A. M. (2015). Coaching the Brain: Neuro-Science or Neuro-Nonsense? The Coaching Psychologist, 11(1), 21-27. [DOI:10.53841/bpstcp.2015.11.1.21]
11. Nowack, K. M., & Radecki, D. (2018). Introduction to the Special Issue: Neuro-Mythconceptions in Consulting Psychology-between a Rock and a Hard Place. Consulting Psychology Journal Practice and Research, 70(1), 1-10. [DOI:10.1037/cpb0000108]
12. Oosten, E. B. V., McBride-Walker, S. M., & Taylor, S. (2019). Investing in What Matters: The Impact of Emotional and Social Competency Development and Executive Coaching on Leader Outcomes. Consulting Psychology Journal Practice and Research, 71(4), 249-269. [DOI:10.1037/cpb0000141]
13. Selimi, E., Lascu, A., Serpiello, F. R., & Woods, C. T. (2023). Exploring Football Coaches' Views on Coach Education, Role, and Practice Design: An Australian Perspective. PLoS One, 18(5), e0285871. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0285871] [PMID] []
14. Sullivan, P., Paquette, K., Holt, N. L., & Bloom, G. A. (2012). The Relation of Coaching Context and Coach Education to Coaching Efficacy and Perceived Leadership Behaviors in Youth Sport. The Sport Psychologist, 26(1), 122-134. [DOI:10.1123/tsp.26.1.122]
15. Townsend, R. C., Cushion, C. J., & Smith, B. (2017). A Social Relational Analysis of an Impairment-Specific Mode of Disability Coach Education. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health, 10(3), 346-361.
https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2017.1407355 [DOI:10.1080/2159676x.2017.1407355]
16. Vangrunderbeek, H., Backer, M. D., McCarthy, L., Buelens, E., & Ponnet, H. (2023). Developing Critical Reflection Skills in a Formal Coach Education Program. International Sport Coaching Journal, 10(1), 54-69. [DOI:10.1123/iscj.2021-0068]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
