Volume 5, Issue 1 (Spring 2022)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2022, 5(1): 33-50 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Malmir H, Amini A A, Puryousefi H. (2022). A Comparative Study of Political Islam with Modernity in the First Pahlavi Era with a Discourse Approach. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 5(1), 33-50. doi:10.61186/ijes.5.1.33
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1127-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1127-en.html
1- PhD student , Department of Sociology, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
3- Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
3- Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, North Tehran Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract: (858 Views)
Purpose: In this study, the sociological model of the conflict between political Islam, jurisprudence and modernity in contemporary Iran (with emphasis on the Pahlavi era) has been studied.
Methodology: The present research method is based on discourse methodology.
Findings: We find that based on the main hypothesis, which seems to be the incomplete understanding of traditional political jurisprudence of the logic of modernity on the one hand and the concern for the rule of modernity values on the other hand has caused a confrontation between the two currents. Findings indicate that due to the passage of time and the need for more tendency of the traditional world to the world of modernity and society is facing modernization and scientific changes; Technical;
Conclusion: The new world requires the adaptation of both traditional and modern tendencies to harmonize and create a new culture, so it is very important to advance the modern or traditional goals of culture and adaptation in society
Methodology: The present research method is based on discourse methodology.
Findings: We find that based on the main hypothesis, which seems to be the incomplete understanding of traditional political jurisprudence of the logic of modernity on the one hand and the concern for the rule of modernity values on the other hand has caused a confrontation between the two currents. Findings indicate that due to the passage of time and the need for more tendency of the traditional world to the world of modernity and society is facing modernization and scientific changes; Technical;
Conclusion: The new world requires the adaptation of both traditional and modern tendencies to harmonize and create a new culture, so it is very important to advance the modern or traditional goals of culture and adaptation in society
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2021/11/30 | Accepted: 2022/05/5 | Published: 2022/06/21
Received: 2021/11/30 | Accepted: 2022/05/5 | Published: 2022/06/21
References
1. Abrahamian, Y. (2010). Iran between the two revolutions, translated by Ahmad Golmohammadi and Mohammad Ibrahim Fattahi, Tehran: Nashr-e Ney.
2. Ahmadi, A. (2002). Postmodernism and Islam. Translated by Farhad Farahmand. Tehran: Third; International Center for the Dialogue of Civilizations. Orientalism. Translator Hojjatullah Judaki. Tehran: Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Printing and Publishing Center.
3. Ahmadi, B. (1994). Modernity and Critical Thought, Tehran: Markaz Publishing.
4. Ajoudani, M. (2008). Iranian Constitution, Hafez August 2008 No. 53
5. Apignasy, R. (2002). Postmodernism (first step). Translated by Fatemeh Jalali Saadat. Tehran: Shirazeh Publishing and Research.
6. Bashirieh, H. (2002). Barriers to Political Development in Iran, Tehran: Gam No Publishing.
7. Descartes, R. (2002). Reflections on the First Philosophy, translated by Ahmad Ahmadi, from Modernism to Postmodernism.
8. Elgar, H. (2003). Book of the Month of History and Geography, June and July 2003, No. 68 and 69
9. Fazeli, N. & Qelich, M. (2013). A New Perspective on Cultural Policy, Tehran: Tisa.
10. Foucault, M. (2018). The Birth of Biopolitics (Lecture by the Collège de France), translated by Reza Najafzadeh, Tehran: Ney Publishing.
11. Gray, C. (2010). Analysing Cultural Policy: Incorrigibly Plural or Ontologically Incompatible? International Journal of Cultural Policy, 16 (2): 215-230. [DOI:10.1080/10286630902935160]
12. Hamid, E. (1986). Modern Islamic Political Thought, The Response of the Shi'i andSunni Muslims to the Tewentieth Century, London.
13. Hefner, R.W., Ed, (2005). Remaking Muslim Politics: Pluralism, Contestation, Democratization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
14. Hurd, Shakman, E, (2007). Political Islam and Foreign Policy in Europe and the United States, Foreign Policy Analysis, Vol. 3. [DOI:10.1111/j.1743-8594.2007.00054.x]
15. Hurd,shakman, E. (2011). Secularism and IR Theory, in: jack, Snyder. Religion and International Relations Theory, Columbia University.
16. Jeong, C. H. & Lee, S. H. (2009). Cultural Policy in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. East Asia, 26 (3): 213-225. [DOI:10.1007/s12140-009-9080-5]
17. Jorgensen, M. & Phillips, L. (2015). Theory and Method in Discourse Analysis, translated by Hadi Jalili, Tehran: Ney Publishing.
18. Kolakowski, L. (1990). Modernity on Endless Tvial, Chicago. [DOI:10.7208/chicago/9780226217406.001.0001] [PMID]
19. Marston, G. & McDonald, C. (Eds.). (2006). Analysing Social Policy: A Governmental Approach. Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
20. Najafi, M. (2003). Political Sociology of Iran, Cultural Universe, February and March 2003, No. 208 and 209
21. Pipes, D. (1994). Fundamentalist Muslim between America and Russia, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 64, No. 5, pp. 939-959. [DOI:10.2307/20042775]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
