1. Adib Manesh, M; Ali Asgari, M; And Mousa Poor, N. (2012).Feasibility of Applying School-Based Curriculum Development in Kermanshah High Schools. Curriculum Researches Journal, N. 2, pp. 81-104.
2. Amin Khandaghi, M; Goodarzi, M .A(2012).Designing Regional Curriculum Development System for Education of the Islamic Republic of Iran. Journal of Curriculum Studies, N. 23, pp. 76-109.
3. Arefi, M. (2007). Analysis of Decentralization Approach in Education System of Iran Based on Human Resources. Journal of Educational Psychology, N. 6, pp. 85-102.
4. Asadi, M (2012). Tendency of Teachers to Participate in Decision Making Related to Curriculum and Distinctive Features Affecting it. MA Thesis of Curriculum Development, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad
5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V.(2006).Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. [
DOI:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa]
6. Cawelti, G. (1974). Urban School Decentralization and Curriculum Development Strategies, In, I.Ezra Stapler, (Ed.), Impact of Decentralization on Curriculums.Washington, D. C.:Associal-Mn for Supervision and Curriculum Development. pp 18-27.
7. Creswell J. W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Education.
8. Curriculum Development Center (2015). A Brief Report on the Works Written by the Provinces. Tehran: Educational Planning and Research Organization.
9. Fathi Vajargah, K (2004). Feasibility of Teacher's Participation in Curriculum Development Process in Education System of Iran. Journal of Educational Innovations, N. 8, pp.5 9-79
10. Fathi Vajargah, K; Gooya, Z; AghaZadeh, M; Abolghasemi, M; Kamkari, K (2002). Designing and Validation of Needs Assessment Scheme of School Based Curriculum (SBCNA). Journal of Educational Innovations, N. 2, pp. 9-34.
11. Gunnarsson, V., Orazem P., Sanchez M., Verdisco A., (2004), Does School Decentralization Raise Student Outcomes? Theory and Evidence on the Roles of School Autonomy and Community Participation. Working Paper 04005, Iowa Stata University Depart of Economics.
12. Hill, P.T. & Bonan, J. (1991). Decentralization and Accountability in Public Education. Santa Monica: RAND. (ED 334665).
13. Izadi, S (2000). Designing Semi-Centralized Scheme for Curriculum Development System of Iran and the Role of Teachers in Curriculum Development Process. PhD Dissertation of Education, Tarbiat Modares University
14. King, J. A. (1991). Evaluative Inquiry: Situational Assessment, In E.C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry, translated by Mehrmohammadi M. et al. (2009), SAMT Publications.
15. Marsh, K. J. (1991). Integrative Inquiry: The Research Synthesis, In E.C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry, translated by Mehrmohammadi M. et al. (2009), SAMT Publications
16. Mehrmohammadi, M (2002). Curriculum: Views, Approaches and Perspectives. Mashhad: Astan Quds Razavi Publications
17. Mehrmohammadi, M (2007). Synchronic Management of Decentralization Stages in the Curriculum Development System. Journal of Curriculum Studies, N. 4, pp. 1-16.
18. Mehrmohammadi, M et al. (2010). Theoretical Scheme of Curriculum and Education Subsystem. Theoretical Studies of National Curriculum Document of Education Organization, Doctrine of Education of Islamic Republic of Iran
19. Morgan, D. L. (1998). The Focus Group Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. [
DOI:10.4135/9781483328164]
20. Nasr Isfahani, A.R., And Golkar Saberi, R (2008). Delegating the Authority of Educational Planning and Curriculum to Teachers Council of the Schools in School Based Management. Journal of Efficient Schools, N. 4, pp. 93-99.
21. Reid, W. (1999). Curriculum as Institution and Practice: Essays in the Deliberative Tradition. Lawrence Elbaum Associate, New Jersey.
22. Schubert, W. H. (1991). Philosophical Research: Theoretical Inquiry, , In E.C. Short (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry, translated by Mehrmohammadi M. et al. (2009), SAMT Publications.
23. Schubert, W. H. (1993). Curriculum Reform. In G. Cawelti (Ed.), Challenges and Achievements of American Education: The 1993 ASCD yearbook (pp. 80-115). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
24. Schwab, J. J. (1969). The practical: A Language for Curriculum. School Review, 78, 1-23. [
DOI:10.1086/442881]
25. Schwab, J. J. (1970). The Practical: A Language for Curriculum (Washington, DC: National.
26. Schwab, J. J. (1983). The Practical: Something for Curriculum Professors to Do. Curriculum Inquiry, 13(3), 239-265.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.1983.11075885 [
DOI:10.2307/1179606]
27. Secretariat of the Curriculum Making (2012).National Curriculum of Islamic Republic of Iran. Fifth Edition; Tehran: Educational Planning and Research Organization
28. Seidman, I. (2012).Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York and London: Teachers College.
29. Short, E. C. (Ed.). (1991). Forms of curriculum inquiry. translated by Mehrmohammadi M. et al. (2009), SAMT Publications.
30. Sturman, A. (1989). Decentralisation and the Curriculum: Effects of the Decentralisation of Curriculum Decision Making in Australia. ACER Research Monograph No. 35. Melbourne: ACER.
31. Utomo, E. (2005). Challenges of Curriculum Reform in the Context of Decentralization: The Response of Teachers to a Competence-Based Curriculum (CBC) and Its Implementation in Schools. This Dissertation was presented. University of Pittsburgh Faculty of Education.
32. Ziba, Simon A., (2011). The Decentralization and Centralization of Curriculum in the Primary Education of Burkina Faso. Master's Theses. Loyola University Chicago. Pub No:1492717.