Volume 6, Issue 1 (Spring 2023)
Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology 2023, 6(1): 151-161 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Solaimanpour A, Nemati N, Bagharpour T. (2023). Presenting the Effective Factors Model on the Establishment of Knowledge Management with the Approach of Interpretive Structural Equations (Case Study: Rowing Federation). Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology. 6(1), 151-161. doi:10.61186/ijes.6.1.151
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1257-en.html
URL: http://iase-idje.ir/article-1-1257-en.html
1- PhD student, Sports Management, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran
2- PhD, Sports Management, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran (corresponding author)
3- PhD, Sports Management, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran.
2- PhD, Sports Management, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran (corresponding author)
3- PhD, Sports Management, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran.
Abstract: (928 Views)
Purpose: Considering the role and importance of establishing knowledge management in various organizations, the purpose of this research was to provide a model of factors affecting the establishment of knowledge management in the sailing federation.
Methodology: This study was of applied method in terms of purpose and quantitative in terms of execution. The study community was the employees of the Iran Rowing Federation in 1401, 20 of whom were selected as a sample using targeted and snowball sampling methods having conditions to enter the study. The samples responded to the researcher-made questionnaire of the factors affecting the establishment of knowledge management in the sailing federation (44 items) and its validity and reliability were evaluated appropriately. Data were analyzed with exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling methods in SPSS and Smart PLS software.
Findings: The findings showed that the factors affecting the establishment of knowledge management in the sailing federation have 14 factors of understanding and insight in employees, expertise of employees, committed managers, participation of employees, motivation of human resources, expertise in knowledge management processes, strategic processes, rules and internal processes, functional processes, innovative processes, technological capabilities, technological infrastructures, technological communication and recognition of knowledge management technologies. Also, the factor load of all factors was higher than 0.50, the convergent validity of all factors with the average variance extracted method was higher than 0.40, and the reliability of all factors with the combined method was higher than 0.70. In addition, the model of factors affecting the establishment of knowledge management in the sailing federation had a good fit, and the effect of all paths was evaluated as appropriate.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, an effective step can be taken to improve the establishment of knowledge management in the sailing federation through the identified factors.
Methodology: This study was of applied method in terms of purpose and quantitative in terms of execution. The study community was the employees of the Iran Rowing Federation in 1401, 20 of whom were selected as a sample using targeted and snowball sampling methods having conditions to enter the study. The samples responded to the researcher-made questionnaire of the factors affecting the establishment of knowledge management in the sailing federation (44 items) and its validity and reliability were evaluated appropriately. Data were analyzed with exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modeling methods in SPSS and Smart PLS software.
Findings: The findings showed that the factors affecting the establishment of knowledge management in the sailing federation have 14 factors of understanding and insight in employees, expertise of employees, committed managers, participation of employees, motivation of human resources, expertise in knowledge management processes, strategic processes, rules and internal processes, functional processes, innovative processes, technological capabilities, technological infrastructures, technological communication and recognition of knowledge management technologies. Also, the factor load of all factors was higher than 0.50, the convergent validity of all factors with the average variance extracted method was higher than 0.40, and the reliability of all factors with the combined method was higher than 0.70. In addition, the model of factors affecting the establishment of knowledge management in the sailing federation had a good fit, and the effect of all paths was evaluated as appropriate.
Conclusion: According to the results of this study, an effective step can be taken to improve the establishment of knowledge management in the sailing federation through the identified factors.
Keywords: Knowledge management, Committed managers, Human Resource Motivation, Expertise in Knowledge Management Processes, Recognition of Knowledge Management Technologies.
Type of Study: Research Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2022/11/14 | Accepted: 2023/03/9 | Published: 2023/05/31
Received: 2022/11/14 | Accepted: 2023/03/9 | Published: 2023/05/31
References
1. Abbas J, Sagsan M. (2019). Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: A structural analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 229: 611-620. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.024]
2. Al-Kurdi OF, El-Haddadeh R, Eldabi T. (2020). The role of organizational climate in managing knowledge sharing among academics in higher education. International Journal of Information Management. 50: 217-227. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.018]
3. Antunes HDJG, Pinheiro PG. (2020). Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 5(2): 140-149. [DOI:10.1016/j.jik.2019.04.002]
4. Baghban N, Aflakifard H, Motamed HR, Hamrahi M. (2022). Design a model for establishing knowledge management in the General Registry Office of Bushehr Province. Journal Iranian Political Sociology. 5(8): 195-213. [Persian]
5. Bootz JP, Durance P, Monti R. (2019). Foresight and knowledge management. New developments in theory and practice. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 140: 80-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.12.017]
6. Dehghani M, Yaghoubi NM, Mooghali A, Vazife Z. (2019). A comprehensive model of factors affecting establishment of knowledge management. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Administration. 10(1): 109-132. [Persian]
7. Ferreira JJ, Fernandes CI, Guo Y, Rammal HG. (2022). Knowledge worker mobility and knowledge management in MNEs: A bibliometric analysis and research agenda. Journal of Business Research. 142: 464-475. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.056]
8. Gast J, Gundolf K, Harms R, Collado EM. (2019). Knowledge management and coopetition: How do cooperating competitors balance the needs to share and protect their knowledge? Industrial Marketing Management. 77: 65-74. [DOI:10.1016/j.indmarman.2018.12.007]
9. Ghorbani S, Beikzad J, Nejad Iranian F, Behlouli N. (2018). Designing the optimal model of knowledge management deployment and institutionalization (Case study: East Azarbaijan province executive). Journal of Public Administration Perspective. 9(4): 225-248. [Persian]
10. Koloniari M, Fassoulis K. (2017). Knowledge management perceptions in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship. 43(2): 135-142. [DOI:10.1016/j.acalib.2016.11.006]
11. Kunkel F, Weibenberger L, Belousow N, Sokollek T, Dopper F. (2022). Concept on using visual and tactile sensors for knowledge management in manual manufacturing processes. Procedia CIRP. 112: 186-190. [DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2022.09.070]
12. Martins VWB, Rampasso IS, Anholon R, Quelhas OLG, Filho WL. (2019). Knowledge management in the context of sustainability: Literature review and opportunities for future research. Journal of Cleaner Production. 229: 489-500. [DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.354]
13. Mehdizadeh P, Dopeykar N, Ghaed M, Akbari SM, Koohestani S. (2020). Investigating the underlying factors of the establishment of knowledge management in insurance organizations: case study in Social Security Organization. Journal of Military Medicine. 21(4): 353-361. [Persian]
14. Mikovic R, Petrovic D, Mihic M, Obradovic V, Todorovic M. (2020). The integration of social capital and knowledge management - The key challenge for international development and cooperation projects of nonprofit organizations. International Journal of Project Management. 38(8): 515-533. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.07.006]
15. Nakayama M, Hustad E, Sutcliffe N. (2021). Agility and system documentation in large-scale enterprise system projects: a knowledge management perspective. Procedia Computer Science. 181: 386-393. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.181]
16. Ode E, Ayavoo R. (2020). The mediating role of knowledge application in the relationship between knowledge management practices and firm innovation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 5(3): 210-218. [DOI:10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002]
17. Pacheco GV, Castillo AE, Manotas EN, Arevalo O. (2022). Analysis of the knowledge management in industrial exporting SMEs. Procedia Computer Science. 203: 476-480. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2022.07.065]
18. Rabhi FA, Bandara M, Lu K, Dewan S. (2021). Design of an innovative IT platform for analytics knowledge management. Future Generation Computer Systems. 116: 209-219. [DOI:10.1016/j.future.2020.10.022]
19. Rahimian H, Abbaspour A, Zarrin H. (2021). Designing a model for establishing knowledge management in schools. Scientific Journal of Management of Organizational Knowledge. 4(13): 1-29. [Persian]
20. Ramezani A, Madhoshi M, Fallah Lajimi HR, Razeghi N. (2019). A model of knowledge management implementation at the University of Mazandaran. Productivity Management. 13(3): 89-117. [Persian]
21. Raudeliuniene J, Davidaviciene V, Jakubavicius A. (2018). Knowledge management process model. The International Journal Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. 5(3): 542-554. [DOI:10.9770/jesi.2018.5.3(10)]
22. Santoro G, Vrontis D, Thrassou A, Dezi L. (2018). The Internet of Things: Building a knowledge management system for open innovation and knowledge management capacity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 136: 347-354. [DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.02.034]
23. Schaefer C, Makatsaria A. (2021). Framework of data analytics and integrating knowledge management. International Journal of Intelligent Networks. 2: 156-165. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijin.2021.09.004]
24. Shabani MM, Rafati Asl SM, Sohrabi Sh. (2021). Possibility of measuring the establishment of knowledge management in the intelligent technology organization. Journal of Information and Communication Technology in Policing. 2(8): 67-84. [Persian]
25. Thomas N. (2021). Towards agile knowledge management in an online organization. Procedia Computer Science. 192: 4406-4415. [DOI:10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.217]
26. Uzelac Z, Celic D, Petrov V, Draskovic Z, Beric D. (2018). Comparative analysis of knowledge management activities in SMEs: Empirical study from a developing country. Procedia Manufacturing. 17: 523-530. [DOI:10.1016/j.promfg.2018.10.092]
27. Wang M, Zheng M, Tian L, Qiu Z, Li X. (2017). A full life cycle nuclear knowledge management framework based on digital system. Annals of Nuclear Energy. 108: 386-393. [DOI:10.1016/j.anucene.2017.04.047]
28. Wang YM, Wang YC. (2016). Determinants of firms' knowledge management system implementation: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior. 64: 829-842. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2016.07.055]
29. Wu KJ, Gao S, Xia L, Tseng ML, Chiu ASF, Zhang Z. (2019). Enhancing corporate knowledge management and sustainable development: An inter-dependent hierarchical structure under linguistic preferences. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 146: 560-579. [DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.015]
30. Xin Y, Ojanen V, Huiskonen J. (2019). Dealing with knowledge management practices in different product lifecycle phases within product-service systems. Procedia CIRP. 83: 111-117. [DOI:10.1016/j.procir.2019.02.132]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
.jpg)
